Shell Signs New Exploration Deal in Kazakhstan Amid Legal Disputes

British energy company Shell has launched a new exploration project in Kazakhstan despite previously announcing that it would pause new investments in the country. On March 5, it was announced that Shell had signed a contract for geological exploration in the Aktobe region. The company has been involved in several legal disputes with Kazakhstan over subsoil use and had stated that it did not plan to invest further in the country’s energy sector. Geological Exploration Contract The Zhanaturmys site, which has attracted Shell’s interest, covers an area of 1,377 square kilometers and is located in one of Kazakhstan’s most actively developed oil and gas basins. The document was signed by Kazakhstan’s Deputy Energy Minister, Yerlan Akbarov, and Shell’s Senior Vice President and Chair in Kazakhstan, Suzanne Coogan. The contract provides for seismic exploration, data collection, and technical assessments. “The signing of today’s contract for geological exploration is further confirmation of Shell’s commitment to long-term cooperation with the Republic of Kazakhstan. Drawing on our global experience and advanced technologies, we intend to continue contributing to geological exploration and the expansion of the country’s resource base,” Coogan said. The agreement will remain in force until 2032. The project will be implemented under the terms of an improved model contract. According to Kazakhstan’s Energy Ministry, the company will allocate at least 100 million tenge (about $200,000) to finance socio-economic development in the region where the site is located. Shell is currently involved in three projects in Kazakhstan: the North Caspian Production Sharing Agreement (NCOC, 16.81% stake); the Karachaganak Production Sharing Agreement (29.25% stake); and the Caspian Pipeline Consortium (7.4% stake). Kazakhstan produces around 1.8–1.9 million barrels per day and hosts some of the world’s largest offshore reserves in the Caspian Sea. Western energy majors, including Shell, Chevron, ExxonMobil, and Eni, have operated in the country for decades through complex production-sharing agreements. Legal Disputes In February, Shell CEO Wael Sawan said the company would suspend new investments in Kazakhstan while legal proceedings with the government were ongoing. Numerous lawsuits filed by Kazakhstan, with claims amounting to billions of dollars, have reduced the company’s willingness to invest in the country, he said. “This affects our desire to continue investing in Kazakhstan. Although we see many opportunities for investment in the future, we will wait until we have a clearer picture of how things will turn out,” Sawan stated. Karachaganak and Kashagan Kazakhstan is currently involved in several legal disputes with Western oil companies, both in national courts and international arbitration. The cases concern two major oil and gas projects. One of them is Karachaganak. In 2023, the Kazakh government filed a lawsuit against the field's developers over cost deductions. The initial claim amounted to $3.5 billion but later increased to $6 billion after additional claims were filed. The project is operated by a consortium led by Eni and Shell, each holding a 29.25% stake. Other partners include Chevron (18%), Lukoil (13.5%, which has agreed to sell its stake), and KazMunayGas (10%). In January, it was...

Shell and Eni Face Up to $4 Billion Payout to Kazakhstan After Arbitration Ruling

Oil and gas majors Shell and Eni, key stakeholders in Kazakhstan’s Karachaganak field, have lost a key stage in an international arbitration case in London and may be required to pay the Kazakh government between $2 billion and $4 billion in compensation. The decision was first reported by Bloomberg. According to the ruling, the arbitration panel upheld Kazakhstan’s argument that the project operators had charged the state under a production sharing agreement (PSA) for unapproved cost overruns and other ineligible expenses. The tribunal found that a significant share of the disputed costs should not have been recovered from the state, siding with Kazakhstan on the central legal question. The arbitration proceedings were conducted behind closed doors, in line with standard practice for PSA disputes. The final compensation amount has yet to be determined, and the ruling remains subject to appeal. However, Bloomberg reported that the tribunal concluded the consortium must return a substantial portion of the contested funds, a decision that could require changes to the PSA’s oil and gas distribution formula. Karachaganak is one of Kazakhstan’s largest oil and gas projects and a cornerstone of the country’s energy sector. The field is operated by the Karachaganak Petroleum Operating consortium, which includes Shell, Eni, Chevron, Kazakhstan’s national oil and gas company KazMunayGas, and Russia’s Lukoil. The Kazakh government initially sought more than $6 billion in compensation, arguing that improper cost recovery had reduced state revenues over several years. The dispute was formally launched in 2023 and followed a broader effort by Kazakhstan to assert stricter oversight over major hydrocarbon projects governed by PSAs. In 2024, international partners reportedly proposed resolving the dispute by constructing a long-delayed gas processing plant at Karachaganak to supply the domestic market, an offer seen as an attempt to reach a negotiated settlement. The plant has long been a point of contention, with Kazakhstan pushing for increased gas processing capacity inside the country rather than exporting raw gas. Kazakhstan’s Ministry of Energy has declined to provide further details on the arbitration, citing confidentiality provisions. In response to an inquiry from BAQ.KZ, the ministry said: “All arbitration materials are subject to the confidentiality of the production sharing agreement and the arbitration agreement between the parties. Until the restrictions are lifted, it is not possible to provide any information.” The ruling marks one of the most significant recent legal setbacks for foreign oil companies operating in Kazakhstan in recent years and could have broader implications for how costs are approved and recovered under PSAs across the country’s energy sector.