• KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00206 0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10760 0%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28571 0%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00206 0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10760 0%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28571 0%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00206 0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10760 0%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28571 0%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00206 0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10760 0%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28571 0%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00206 0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10760 0%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28571 0%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00206 0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10760 0%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28571 0%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00206 0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10760 0%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28571 0%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00206 0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10760 0%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28571 0%

Viewing results 1 - 6 of 92

Why Kazakhstan Is Moving Ahead in GDP Per Capita

The International Monetary Fund has projected Kazakhstan to reach roughly $23,170 in nominal GDP per capita by 2031. On the same current-dollar measure, it is projected to pass China around 2026 and Russia by 2031. The comparison is a milestone, but it requires perspective. It is neither a purchasing-power verdict nor a comprehensive measure of household welfare. It nevertheless marks Kazakhstan’s entry into a higher income band. The question is how a state that began independence amid post-Soviet economic disruption reached this stage. How Kazakhstan Reached This Point Kazakhstan’s present position rests on a three-decade progression of state capacity, resource development, and institutional learning. When the Soviet Union collapsed, the country did not inherit a working growth model. It inherited broken production chains, institutional rupture, and inflation. It therefore faced the task of building a market economy out of an administrative-command system. In current U.S. dollars, GDP per capita stood near $1,400 in 1991, and exceeded $14,000 by 2024; in constant-dollar terms, the gain was smaller but still substantial. Hydrocarbons supplied the base, but political institutions and leadership acumen determined how much of that base could survive volatility. The path since 1991 has not been smooth. The 1990s brought collapse and stabilization. The 2000s brought hydrocarbon acceleration, foreign direct investment, and a rise in nominal GDP per capita climbing from a little more than $1,000 in 2000 to more than $8,000 in 2008. The global financial crisis interrupted the rise without destroying the model. The early 2010s brought recovery. The 2014–2016 oil-price and exchange-rate shock then tested the foundations already built, as the current-dollar figure fell sharply while real output per person proved more stable. COVID imposed another interruption. The post-2020 rebound belongs to that sequence. The Tokayev agenda belongs to this third stage of institutional learning. It did not create the GDP per capita trajectory over three decades, but today the issue has shifted from accumulation to stewardship. The inherited growth model had to be made more competitive, more rules-based, more socially visible, and more sustainable. Since 2022, the government has treated de-monopolization, asset recovery, social investment, and private-sector development as connected elements of the same governing effort. The IMF’s latest assessment shows the pressure inside that effort: growth remains strong, supported by oil output and non-oil activity, while fiscal, inflationary, and quasi-state-sector pressures still require correction. The Reform Program and Its Results Decree No. 542, signed in May 2024, set out measures to liberalize the economy, limit expansion of the quasi-state sector, revise privatization criteria, strengthen competition, and improve conditions for entrepreneurship. Its operative terms are competition, privatization, reduced state participation, and lower business costs. The decree temporarily halts the creation of new quasi-state entities and provides for an audit of state and quasi-state assets, partly to identify candidates for privatization. It also incorporates reforms affecting procurement and business regulation. The decree seeks to bend Kazakhstan’s accumulated macroeconomic trajectory toward commercial governance. The challenge is not to remove state capacity but to prevent it from crowding out private...

Kyrgyzstan’s Industrial Output Rises as Employment Falls

Industrial production in Kyrgyzstan has increased more than six times over the past 15 years, although the sector’s share of the national economy has declined and employment in industry has fallen sharply, according to data from the National Statistical Committee. By the end of 2025, industry accounted for 17.7% of Kyrgyzstan’s GDP, compared to 20.7% in 2010. At the same time, industrial output increased by more than 530% over the same period. In 2010, the value of industrial production was estimated at around $1.4 billion, while by 2025 output had reached approximately $9.1 billion. The figures indicate significant industrial growth, although other sectors of the economy, particularly trade and services, have expanded even faster, analysts say. The sector has also experienced a sharp decline in employment. Around 268,000 people worked in industry in 2010, but by 2025 that number had fallen to 144,000. At the same time, the number of industrial enterprises increased from roughly 2,000 to 2,400, which statisticians say points to structural changes and rising productivity. Manufacturing remains the backbone of Kyrgyzstan’s industrial sector, accounting for nearly 80% of all industrial enterprises. The country’s main industrial segments include food processing, textile production, construction materials, and primary raw-material processing, including metallurgy. High-tech industries such as machinery manufacturing, electronics, and advanced chemical processing remain underdeveloped. Energy accounts for around 10.2% of industrial production, while mining contributes 9.2%. Economists note that much of Kyrgyzstan’s processing industry still produces goods with relatively low added value. The raw materials sector, particularly gold mining, continues to be one of the main drivers of industrial growth despite its comparatively modest share in the overall production structure. At the same time, energy development remains one of the biggest constraints on further industrialization. Despite active construction of solar and wind power plants, small hydropower stations, and implementation of the large Kambar-Ata-1 hydropower project, Kyrgyzstan continues to face electricity shortages during the winter season. The energy deficit limits the launch of energy-intensive industries and continues to restrain investment inflows into the industrial sector.

Kazakhstan’s SMEs Face Severe Labor Shortage

Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in Kazakhstan have become one of the country’s main sources of employment, but are facing a severe labor shortage, according to a joint report by Mastercard and KPMG. The report identifies workforce shortages as one of the most pressing challenges for SMEs, with nearly half of businesses reporting acute staffing deficits. The main reasons cited are the limited supply of qualified specialists and their high cost. According to the report, SME executives say, “It is difficult to find qualified employees, especially production managers: candidates do not meet requirements, and staff are not motivated to develop, despite high salaries and good working conditions. Scaling up the business requires increasing the number of skilled employees, which is constrained by limited financial resources and labor shortages.” At the same time, 90% of surveyed business leaders say they face high salary expectations from potential employees, which smaller firms struggle to meet. Around 70% of respondents also acknowledge that SMEs are widely perceived as less prestigious places to work. Labor productivity in micro and small businesses remains more than twice as low as in medium and large enterprises. In 2025, a worker in a small business generated an average of about $10,100, compared with $34,300 in medium-sized firms, and the gap continues to widen. Limited access to financing and the high cost of borrowing also remain major constraints for SMEs. Additional factors hindering SME development include an unstable tax and regulatory environment, as well as broader macroeconomic volatility. Despite these challenges, SMEs are a key source of employment in Kazakhstan. Over the past five years, employment in the sector has grown from 40% to 50% of the workforce. Today, around 4.7 million people out of 9.3 million employed nationwide work in SMEs, meaning roughly one in two workers is employed in this segment. According to the report, SME employment has been growing at an average annual rate of 6%, while employment in other sectors has declined by about 3% per year. “The concentration of employment in SMEs makes the labor market vulnerable to tax and regulatory changes: negative shocks in the sector could directly translate into rising unemployment,” the report notes. As previously reported by The Times of Central Asia, SMEs currently account for about 40% of Kazakhstan’s GDP, a figure that remains below benchmark countries such as Turkey (41%), the United States (44%), and Uzbekistan (52%).

Why Strong Economic Growth in Central Asia Masks Underlying Risks

Central Asian countries are significantly outperforming the global average in GDP growth, largely due to differing economic models across the region. However, rapid expansion does not remove deep structural vulnerabilities. As early as March, data showed that the combined economies of Central Asian countries grew by nearly 7% in 2025 compared to the previous year. The World Bank estimates regional growth at 6.2%, while the Eurasian Development Bank (EDB) places it at 6.6%. These calculations include Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, and Tajikistan; Turkmenistan is excluded due to limited statistical transparency. By comparison, growth rates in advanced economies are much lower. The EDB expects around 1.6% growth in the U.S. and approximately 1.1% in the eurozone in 2026, while China’s economy is projected to expand by about 4.6%. Nevertheless, experts note that the region’s economic outlook remains complicated by high inflation, income inequality, and continued dependence on external factors. Investment activity and domestic demand have been the key drivers of growth, according to the EDB. Kazakhstan recorded its highest growth in 13 years (6.5%), with industry leading the expansion: mining grew by 9.4% and manufacturing by 6.4%. In 2026, the non-resource sector is expected to play a greater role. Kyrgyzstan has led the region in GDP growth for the third consecutive year: GDP grew by 11.1% in 2025 and by 9% in January 2026. In Uzbekistan, GDP increased by 7.7% in 2025 (up from 6.7% a year earlier), supported by investment, trade, services, and construction. Tajikistan’s GDP rose by 8.4% in 2025, matching the previous year’s performance. Growth continues to be driven by expanding industrial production and strong domestic demand. Early 2026 data suggest this momentum is holding. Uzbekistan’s Record In April, the World Bank highlighted Uzbekistan’s resilience to external challenges and strong growth dynamics. According to its updated report, the country’s 2025 GDP growth was revised upward by 1.5 percentage points to 7.7%. The outlook is 6.4% for 2026 and 6.7% for 2027. Key drivers include high global gold prices, investment inflows, expanded lending, and ongoing structural reforms. Rising household incomes have also played an important role, supported by remittances, which increased by 37% last year to reach $18.9 billion. By the end of 2025, Uzbekistan ranked among the fastest-growing economies in developing countries in Europe and Central Asia, alongside Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan. The region as a whole is experiencing its highest growth rates in 14 years. At the same time, analysts point to persistent structural constraints, including a large public sector and the dominance of state-owned enterprises, which hinder private sector development. External risks, including geopolitical instability and potential disruptions in energy and fertilizer supplies, remain significant. In 2025, Uzbekistan’s GDP exceeded €133 billion, compared to approximately €56 billion nine years earlier. Over the same period, GDP per capita rose from about €1,750 to around €3,220, nearly doubling average income levels. Investment in fixed capital increased by more than 15% year-on-year in 2025, while export value grew by over 33%. Persistently high global gold prices played a major role: export...

IMF Warns of Risks for Rapidly Growing Kyrgyz Economy

Kyrgyzstan continues to record strong economic growth and rising per capita income. At the same time, elevated inflation above the National Bank’s 5%-7% target range, rapid credit expansion, strong wage growth, and high liquidity point to signs of economic overheating, requiring timely macroeconomic policy adjustments. These are the key points of an International Monetary Fund (IMF) statement following consultations with Kyrgyz authorities in Bishkek between March 18 and April 1. The IMF noted that after recording fiscal surpluses between 2023 and 2025, the overall fiscal balance is projected to shift into deficit in 2026, reflecting higher public-sector wages and increased capital spending. The mission also emphasized that monetary policy should remain focused on bringing inflation back within the National Bank’s target range. Strengthening the central bank’s independence and governance remains critical to safeguarding price stability. Repeated transfers of National Bank profits to the state budget, while capital remains below statutory thresholds, risk undermining institutional credibility and the effectiveness of monetary policy. The IMF urged the authorities to uphold the provisions of the constitutional law governing the National Bank and to suspend regular profit transfers until capital is adequately restored. According to the IMF, Kyrgyzstan’s banking sector is stable, well capitalized, and liquid. However, nonperforming loans remain elevated, and rapid credit growth could increase vulnerabilities if macroeconomic conditions deteriorate. The mission stressed that structural reforms remain essential to support sustainable and inclusive growth. These should focus on strengthening governance, reducing the state’s role in the economy, and fostering private-sector-led development. Key priorities include reforming state-owned enterprises, improving the business environment and competition, strengthening the rule of law and anti-corruption efforts, and addressing informality and labor market rigidities. According to the National Statistical Committee, Kyrgyzstan’s gross domestic product (GDP) grew by 11.1% in 2025, while inflation reached 9.4%. The government aims to sustain economic growth under the National Development Program through 2030, targeting average annual GDP growth of 8%, total GDP of at least $30 billion, and GDP per capita of $4,500. The Asian Development Bank (ADB) also forecasts continued strong growth, projecting GDP expansion of 8.9% in 2026 and 8.4% in 2027, following 11.1% growth in 2025. Growth is expected to moderate as construction and trade normalize, although domestic demand will remain the main driver, supported by resilient remittance inflows and sustained investment under the National Development Program. ADB projects inflation to rise to 10.3% in 2026 before easing to 8.5% in 2027, driven by strong domestic demand and planned increases in electricity and heating tariffs. Concerns about overheating are not new. A July 2025 meeting at the Kyrgyz Ministry of Economy and Commerce highlighted structural imbalances, including a widening gap between income growth and labor productivity, rising inflation, labor shortages, increased public spending, and rapid growth in consumer lending. Economist Azamat Akeneev told 24.kg that sustainable growth is not possible without improvements in labor productivity and exports. “If the economy grows through consumption and government spending rather than competitiveness and expansion into foreign markets, sooner or later an adjustment phase...

Kyrgyz Citizens Are Spending More and Saving Less

The financial habits of Kyrgyz citizens has changed significantly in recent years: people are spending more and saving less. This conclusion was reached by the country's National Statistical Committee. According to the agency, the share of household savings has more than halved, from 24.3% of income in 2020 to 10.8% in 2024. Until 2021, however, Kyrgyz citizens had shown a tendency to save. This contributed to the growth of banks’ deposit bases, and the authorities noted increasing confidence in the financial sector. Formally, this confidence remains, but household behavior has changed. In 2024, the country’s gross disposable income amounted to approximately $20.5 billion, of which roughly $18.2 billion was directed towards consumption. A significant share of economic activity is therefore effectively geared towards meeting current domestic demand. This trend coincides with a period of strong economic growth that the authorities have described as a “leopard’s leap.” In recent years, GDP growth has reached about 10% annually. Economists say domestic demand remains the key driver of growth. The construction sector is expanding, mortgage lending is increasing, and infrastructure projects and gold mining continue to develop. Another indicator of changing behavior is the rise in household consumer spending. Its share increased from 75.4% of GDP in 2020 to 86.9% in 2024. At the same time, statistics show so-called negative savings, meaning that the population is spending more than it officially earns. In practice, this reflects the active use of loans and other external sources of financing. The banking sector and the State Mortgage Company (SMC) play a key role in this process, supporting consumption and thereby stimulating economic growth. Despite continued economic expansion, according to official data, GDP increased by 8% in January-February 2026, analysts warn of potential risks. The decline in savings means households have fewer resources to build a financial “safety cushion.” With incomes largely directed towards current consumption, their resilience to economic shocks is weakening.