• KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00200 0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.09163 -0.11%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28530 -0.14%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00200 0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.09163 -0.11%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28530 -0.14%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00200 0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.09163 -0.11%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28530 -0.14%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00200 0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.09163 -0.11%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28530 -0.14%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00200 0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.09163 -0.11%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28530 -0.14%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00200 0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.09163 -0.11%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28530 -0.14%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00200 0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.09163 -0.11%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28530 -0.14%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00200 0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.09163 -0.11%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28530 -0.14%
19 February 2025

Viewing results 1 - 6 of 43

CNN Report on Ibn Sina Sparks Central Asian Nationality Debate

A recent CNN report referring to the scholar Ibn Sina as an Uzbek scientist has ignited controversy in Central Asia, particularly in Tajikistan. Tajikistan’s Minister of Culture, Matlubakhon Sattoriyon, strongly criticized the report, calling it a “distortion of reality.” Ibn Sina, known as Avicenna in the West, was a polymath who made groundbreaking contributions to medicine, logic, physics, mathematics, and other sciences. Born in 980 in the village of Afshona near Bukhara, an area now part of Uzbekistan, he died in 1037. Over his lifetime, he authored more than 450 works, with about 240 surviving to this day. His most renowned book, The Canon of Medicine (Tib qonunlari), served as a standard medical text in Europe and the Islamic world for centuries. While the Ibn Sina segment was actually created not by CNN itself but by the Center of Islamic Civilization in Uzbekistan, Sattoriyon accused CNN of disregarding historical facts and described the report as another example of what she called the “appropriation” of Tajik's scientific and literary heritage. “This is an insult not only to the Tajik people but also to the history and culture of Persian literature worldwide,” she said. The minister urged Tajik scientists and intellectuals to counter such claims with evidence, though she also dismissed CNN’s report as “just a TV channel’s material with no historical basis,” pointing out that it does not reflect Uzbekistan’s official stance. In Uzbekistan, reactions to the controversy varied. Sherzodkhon Kudratkhuja, Rector of the University of Journalism and Mass Communications, acknowledged the shared history of Uzbekistan and Tajikistan and called for moderation. “At a time when Central Asia is strengthening its unity, we must all approach such issues carefully,” Kudratkhuja said. He emphasized that Ibn Sina is commonly described as a scholar born in Bukhara, a region now within Uzbekistan’s borders, but suggested that he should be seen as a figure representing the entire Central Asian region. Bobur Bekmurodov, Chairman of Uzbekistan’s “Yuksalish” movement, expressed disappointment with Tajikistan’s criticism. “The legacy of figures like Ibn Sina belongs to the entire region and the world,” Bekmurodov said. He urged Central Asian nations to focus on shared challenges such as climate change, economic growth, and security rather than divisive historical disputes. Azamat Ziyo, Director of the Institute of History at Uzbekistan’s Academy of Sciences, echoed calls for regional unity. “There is no written evidence about the nationality of many historical figures in Central Asia, including Ibn Sina. What matters is their contribution to science and humanity, not their nationality,” he stated. Ziyo also appealed to politicians to avoid interfering in historical scholarship. “The science of history is the business of historians. We should rely on objective, source-based research rather than political interpretations,” he said. He emphasized the importance of collaboration among historians from Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Turkmenistan to address shared historical legacies. Drawing on his 40 years of research into the history of Central Asian statehood, Ziyo explained the complexity of national identities in the region. “During the reign of the...

Amre Kashaubaev and the Mystery of an Old Photograph

In Kazakhstan, the musical talent of Amre Kashaubaev is well known. Thanks to him, European audiences were introduced to the live melodies of Kazakh music when Kashaubaev performed Kazakh songs at the International Exhibition of Modern Decorative and Industrial Arts of 1925 in Paris. As previously reported by The Times of Central Asia, the first recordings of Kazakh music were made between 1903 and 1909 during the travels of the German explorer Richard Karutz in Turkestan. His book, Among the Kirghiz and Turkmens in Mangyshlak, published in 1911 in Russia, was edited by Vasily Radlov, a renowned ethnographer, archaeologist, and educator of German origin, who was also a pioneer in Turkology. However, it was only in 1925, thanks to Kashaubaev’s talent, that Europeans could hear Kazakh folk songs performed live. The fate of this man is very similar to the destinies of thousands of talented individuals in the early years of the Soviet Union, whose creative works could not fit into the "Procrustean bed" of communist ideology. [caption id="attachment_27972" align="aligncenter" width="1279"] Amre Kashaubaev and his wife Orazke, Kzyl-Orda, 1926.[/caption] Amre Kashaubaev was born in 1888 in the Abraly district of the Semipalatinsk region. His first professional attempt to become a singer was a public performance at a fair near the village of Koyandy, not far from the modern city of Petropavlovsk, at a festival of Kazakh oral art. Through his songs, Kashaubaev’s art became famous throughout Kazakhstan. Anatoly Lunacharsky, then the People’s Commissar for Education, personally invited him to participate in concerts at the International Exhibition in Paris. Kashaubaev also actively participated in the creation of the first Kazakh professional theater. In April 1927, he gave a concert in Moscow, followed by a performance in Frankfurt. He frequently performed on the radio, singing Kazakh folk songs and enchanting listeners with the beauty and depth of his voice. His theatrical performances also garnered great interest. Today, archival institutions and museums in Kazakhstan hold only a few photographs and documents depicting Kashaubaev. This is because many documents were destroyed by his colleagues and relatives due to his political persecution by the Bolsheviks. His trip to Paris proved to be fatal for the singer since it drew the attention of the Soviet state security agencies. During the Paris exhibition, the talented singer met Kazakh political dissident Mustafa Shokay, who in 1917 had been the Chairman of the Kokand Autonomy — a state entity that lasted for six months in the Turkestan region of the Russian Empire. Moreover, Shokay was an active member of the Alash Party, which the Soviets deemed bourgeois and whose members were subjected to repression. Although Kashaubaev was not imprisoned for his ties with political opponents of the Bolsheviks, he faced significant pressure from the authorities. On December 6, 1934, he was found dead on the streets of Alma-Ata. The cause of his death remains unknown. Within the archival fonds of The Central State Archive of Film, Photo Documents, and Sound Recordings of the Republic of Kazakhstan, we believe there...

Kyrgyz MP Urges Parliament to Preserve Lenin Monument in Bishkek

Kyrgyz parliamentary deputy Iskhak Masaliyev has called on his fellow parliamentarians to refrain from debating the removal of the Vladimir Lenin monument in Bishkek’s Old Square. Speaking during a parliamentary session, Masaliyev emphasized that the proposal to dismantle the statue is both untimely and dismissive of Lenin's historical contribution to the formation of Kyrgyz statehood. Masaliyev reminded lawmakers that while the collapse of the Soviet Union granted independence to many nations, Soviet governance played a pivotal role in establishing the foundations of statehood for certain republics, including Kyrgyzstan. He outlined the historical context of the early 20th century, noting that the territory of modern Kyrgyzstan was then divided - part of it belonging to the Russian Empire and the other to the Kokand Khanate. According to the MP, the October Revolution was instrumental in creating the Kara-Kyrgyz Autonomous Oblast, which later evolved into the Kyrgyz Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic and, eventually, an independent Kyrgyz state. “Many nations of the world still do not have their own territory. We, on the other hand, have a state with clearly defined borders, and Vladimir Lenin’s role in this is significant. I say this not as a politician, but as a historian,” Masaliyev declared. The MP expressed concern about modern society’s increasing disregard for history, noting that a substantial portion of the Kyrgyz population - around 30 to 40 percent - lived during the Soviet era and were shaped by its values. Erasing the memory of that period, he argued, is both impractical and disrespectful to the past. Masaliyev also pointed out the proximity of Lenin’s monument to a statue of Turdakun Usubaliyev, a prominent Soviet-era statesman and reformer. He argued that commemorating Usubaliyev and other notable figures from the Soviet period while removing Lenin’s monument would be inconsistent, as all were part of the same ideological framework underpinned by Lenin’s leadership. “We must understand that we cannot simultaneously honor some of them while rejecting the memory of others,” Masaliyev stressed. In closing, Masaliyev urged his colleagues to shelve the debate over the Lenin monument, suggesting that the parliament’s focus should instead be directed toward more pressing national issues. The discussion surrounding the Lenin statue gained momentum after parliament deputy speaker Nurbek Sydygaliyev proposed its removal, arguing that the square is named after Turdakun Usubaliyev and should honor his legacy exclusively.

Uzbekistan Receives Historic Manuscript Copies from Malaysia

Uzbekistan’s cultural heritage will soon be added to with facsimile copies of ancient manuscripts provided by Malaysia. This initiative is part of a collaboration between the Center for Islamic Civilization in Uzbekistan and Malaysia’s International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization. During a recent visit to Malaysia by an Uzbek delegation, the Center’s Director, Firdavs Abdukhalikov, received copies of two invaluable works: Abu Rayhan Beruni's At-Tafhim and Abulkasim Firdavsi's Shahnameh, both transcribed during the Timurid era. Abdukhalikov believes this initiative aligns with broader efforts to promote humanitarian values and preserve Uzbekistan’s historical heritage. “The copies of manuscripts received today will further enrich the exposition of our center,” he stated. Beruni’s At-Tafhim, originally transcribed in 1197, holds immense significance for world science. Meanwhile, the Timurid-era transcription of Firdavsi’s Shahnameh, produced in the 15th century, reflects the traditions of book printing from that period and showcases the distinctive features of Kamoliddin Behzod’s renowned school of miniature painting. These manuscripts will be displayed at the Center for Islamic Civilization, which was established eight years ago to celebrate the contributions of Uzbek scholars to global civilization and to preserve the nation’s rich cultural legacy.

Kazakhstan Updates Rules for Installing Monuments and Memorials

New regulations governing the installation of monumental art structures have come into effect in Kazakhstan, following an order issued by the Ministry of Culture and Information. The updated rules delegate the responsibility for organizing monument installations to local executive bodies in oblasts, cities of republican significance, and the capital. Funding for these projects may come from local budgets or other sources permitted under Kazakh law. Monuments and busts can only be erected in honor of exceptional individuals or to commemorate significant historical events. Such proposals must be approved by a resolution from the Government of Kazakhstan. The regulations also specify that monuments can be erected during a person’s lifetime in exceptional cases. “The monument may be established not earlier than five years after the death of an outstanding personality, except in cases of heroism, contribution to strengthening independence, or other significant events,” the document states. Additionally, each locality may commemorate a historical event or prominent individual with only one monument. Installation sites must be located on state property or public facilities. Monument projects will be selected through a national creative competition among sculptors to minimize corruption risks. These competitions are organized based on annual plans, with regional proposals submitted by December 1 each year. Kazakhstan has only erected lifetime monuments for one individual: former President Nursultan Nazarbayev. However, several of these monuments were dismantled following the events of January 2022. During the unrest, rioters destroyed a four-meter-high sculpture of Nazarbayev in Taldykorgan. In subsequent months, other monuments to Nazarbayev were removed from public spaces. For instance, his monument was taken down at the National Defense University in Astana, his portrait was removed from Almaly station in the Almaty subway, and in February, his sculpture was removed from the National Museum of Kazakhstan in Astana.

Marked by Tragedy: Why Kazakhstan’s Independence Day Is a Day of Reflection

On December 16, Kazakhstan marks Independence Day, commemorating the adoption of the Law on Independence and State Sovereignty of the Republic of Kazakhstan in 1991. Until 2022, the country observed this holiday over two days - December 16 and 17 - but recent legislative changes have reduced the celebration to a single day. The amendments to the Law on Holidays in the Republic of Kazakhstan, adopted in September 2022, redefined the country’s official holidays. Republic Day on October 25 regained its national holiday status, while December 1 - Day of the First President - was removed as a public holiday. Independence Day, while still classified as a state holiday, was given a more somber tone, with official emphasis placed on honoring the sacrifices that paved the way to sovereignty. [caption id="attachment_26631" align="aligncenter" width="1204"] @TCA, Askar KubaizhanovIndependence monument[/caption] From Republic Day to Independence Day The roots of Republic Day lie in Kazakhstan’s Declaration of State Sovereignty, adopted on October 25, 1990, as the Soviet Union was nearing its collapse. The declaration symbolized Kazakhstan’s first step toward independence. However, following the country’s full independence in 1991, December 16 became the primary national holiday. Republic Day lost its significance in 2009 but was reinstated as a national holiday in 2022. President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev, in his proposal to restore Republic Day, emphasized its role as the foundation of Kazakhstan’s independence journey. He suggested that Independence Day, while significant, should serve as a time for mourning and remembrance to honor those who contributed to the country’s sovereignty. [caption id="attachment_26632" align="aligncenter" width="1600"] @TCA, Askar Kubaizhanov[/caption] The Legacy of December 1986: Zheltoksan Protests December 16 carries weighty historical significance for Kazakhstan. On this day in 1986, protests erupted in Alma-Ata (now Almaty) after Moscow appointed Gennady Kolbin - a Soviet official with no prior ties to Kazakhstan - as head of the Kazakh SSR. Young Kazakh protesters demanded the application of the Korenization principle, which advocated for local leadership in Soviet republics. The protests, often viewed as a precursor to Kazakhstan’s independence movement, were violently suppressed by Soviet authorities. The operation reportedly codenamed “Blizzard,” was designed to provoke unrest and then crush it through bloodshed. Controversially, Nursultan Nazarbayev, who would later become Kazakhstan’s first president, was aligned with Soviet power at the time. In his memoir "Without Right and Left, "Nazarbayev claimed he led one of the protest columns during the demonstrations. For many Kazakh citizens, particularly those who participated in or were affected by the events, December 16-17 remain days of mourning. Almaty’s Peace Street was renamed Zheltoksan Street to honor the memory of the victims. December 2011: The Zhanaozen Tragedy The somber tone surrounding Independence Day was reinforced by the events of December 16, 2011, in Zhanaozen. For months prior, oil workers in the Mangystau region had been on strike, demanding better wages. The protests escalated when workers occupied the city’s central square. On Independence Day, clashes broke out between protesters and local officials during holiday celebrations. The situation turned violent when a group of...