Rare Earth Elements - The Times Of Central Asia

Viewing results 1 - 6 of 37

Critical Minerals

Uzbekistan’s $4.2 Billion Critical Minerals Plan Aims to Turn Raw Materials Into Industry

Uzbekistan has placed a $4.2 billion critical minerals program at the center of its industrial policy, as Tashkent seeks to turn Soviet-era mining strengths into higher-value production for modern supply chains. The country has long sold metals and minerals, but the program reviewed by President Shavkat Mirziyoyev on June 15 puts more emphasis on refining, laboratory work, skilled workers, and finished industrial goods. The new 2026-2030 program, which sets out 120 projects, aims to lift critical minerals output to $1 billion by 2028 and $2 billion by 2030. The first tranche, planned for this year, covers 12 projects worth $166 million and production of high-purity selenium, tellurium, and rhenium. It also includes 21 import-substituting products, including powder metallurgy auto parts and sulfuric acid. The plan landed as investors gathered in Tashkent for the Fifth Tashkent International Investment Forum. Mirziyoyev used the forum to make a broader reform pitch. “We are always open to investors interested in cooperating with Uzbekistan and ready for an equal and mutually beneficial partnership,” he said in his opening speech. He also announced plans for a Tashkent International Financial Center with zero rates for profit tax, value-added tax, property tax, and customs duties. Critical minerals give that investment pitch a clearer focus. Global buyers are looking for supplies that do not depend on a handful of processing hubs, while resource-rich countries want more of the value to stay at home. Uzbekistan is trying to move into that field with metals it already produces, especially tungsten and molybdenum, and with smaller but valuable materials used in electronics, aerospace, energy equipment, and advanced manufacturing. The Uzbekistan Technological Metals Complex, known as TMK or UzTMK, is the state vehicle for much of this work. The company says its portfolio includes tungsten, molybdenum, rhenium, graphite, selenium, tellurium, lithium, nickel, and cobalt. Its stated model is “mine-metal-market,” meaning a chain from extraction to metal products and buyers. The June 15 package adds practical details. Uzbekistan wants more than concentrates and semi-finished goods. The presidential briefing listed metal powders, alloys, rods, wire, industrial parts, and finished products. For tungsten and molybdenum, that means deeper processing inside Uzbekistan rather than sending value abroad. Chirchik, east of Tashkent, is set to play a larger role. The government plans to expand the Metals of the Future technopark and build up an R&D center there. The site is designed to support start-ups, commercialize applied research, and produce high-purity metals. A planned nano-analysis laboratory would process up to 1,000 samples a day once fully operational. Officials say it could replace $6.5 million in imported analytical services and generate $4 million through service exports. The lab is one of the more practical parts of the program. Mining projects need more than deposits and investment pledges. They need reliable samples, resource estimates that meet international standards, steady power, and proven processing methods. A credible laboratory in Chirchik would not remove all those risks, but it would make it easier to move from geological data to financed projects. Global demand...

Data Sovereignty

Opinion: Data Sovereignty Will Decide Central Asia’s Critical Minerals Moment

The critical minerals conversation across Central Asia still too often begins in the wrong place: with what lies beneath the ground. It should begin with who controls the knowledge of what lies beneath it. For more than a century, the resource bargain usually ran in one direction. Foreign companies arrived with the instruments, surveys, and models. Host governments arrived with the territory. The resulting terms were often shaped by information asymmetry: not only who owned the rock, but who owned the data about the rock. That asymmetry is easier to narrow than it used to be. Airborne geophysical surveys, satellite-based mapping, modern geochemistry, and national geological databases can now give governments a clearer picture of their mineral endowment before the first serious investor meeting. The decisive question is not simply whether data can be generated. It is who owns it, who validates it, and who is allowed to use it when concessions, joint ventures, and infrastructure commitments are being negotiated. Capital is the reason this matters now. Critical minerals are no longer a specialist mining issue; they sit at the center of debates over energy security, electric vehicles, grid infrastructure, semiconductors, and defense supply chains. The IEA's Global Critical Minerals Outlook 2025 tracks how demand and supply are shifting across copper, lithium, nickel, cobalt, graphite, and rare earth elements. The U.S. C5+1 Critical Minerals Dialogue and the EU's strategic partnership with Kazakhstan show that Central Asia is already part of this conversation. But attention is not the same as leverage. Governments that negotiate from outdated maps, fragmented archives, or company-controlled exploration data will struggle to turn geopolitical interest into durable national benefit. They may still attract investors, but they will be negotiating through someone else's lens. A country that arrives at the table with modern, independently verifiable geological intelligence has more options. It can better value concessions, compare competing proposals, set clearer environmental and infrastructure expectations, and decide which resources are strategic enough to develop slowly rather than quickly. Data does not guarantee a good agreement. It does make a bad agreement harder to excuse. This is sovereignty in a practical form. The point is not to close the door to foreign capital or technical expertise. Central Asia will need both. The point is to ensure that the public side of the table has a master copy of the evidence. When the state owns the underlying data, investors can still compete on capital, technology, processing capability, logistics, and market access. What they should not control is the government's basic understanding of its own resource base. There is also a diplomatic dimension. The Minerals Security Partnership Forum is built around responsible, diverse, and resilient value chains, with Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan among its members. For Central Asian governments, that creates an opening to ask not only who will mine, but who will build capacity - and who will leave the country with stronger institutions than before. Geological data, mining cadastres, processing plans, environmental baselines, and contract terms are all part of the...

AMM 2026

U.S. Investors Show Growing Interest in Kazakhstan’s Mining Sector

U.S. investors are showing growing interest in Kazakhstan’s critical minerals sector, with attention increasingly focused not only on extraction but also on processing, metallurgy and broader supply-chain development, according to Nicole Rodgers, president of the U.S.-based Alliance for Mineral Security, an industry group representing companies involved in mining, processing and the use of strategic minerals. Rodgers spoke during the panel session “Investment Climate in Mining and Metallurgy” at the Astana Mining & Metallurgy Congress, AMM 2026, where she emphasized that predictability and regulatory consistency are among the most important conditions for attracting global capital. “In our view, Kazakhstan is moving in the right direction, including by harmonizing regulations with international standards, developing early-stage geological exploration, building industrial clusters and moving toward more sophisticated investment structures,” Rodgers said. “At the same time, American investors are interested not only in extraction, but in participating across the entire value chain.” She pointed to an agreement between U.S.-based Cove Capital and Kazakhstan’s national mining company Tau-Ken Samruk on the joint development of the Severny Katpar and Verkhne Kairakty tungsten deposits in the Karaganda region of central Kazakhstan. Under the deal, the investment package includes plans to build two processing plants and a metallurgical facility, with a total projected value of $1.1 billion. Interest from Washington has also been reinforced at the political level. Speaking at the C5+1 Critical Minerals Dialogue in June, U.S. Special Envoy for South and Central Asia Sergio Gor said Washington intended to play an active role in developing Central Asia’s mining sectors. “Interest in Kazakhstan from American investors is high, but for that interest to materialize in practice, infrastructure, energy capacity and skilled personnel are critical,” Rodgers added. While foreign interest is rising, industry representatives said Kazakhstan’s ability to convert that interest into long-term investment will depend on the consistency of its legal and regulatory framework. Nikolai Radostovets, executive director of the Republican Association of Mining and Metallurgical Enterprises, said amendments to Kazakhstan’s Subsoil Code, adopted in 2018, should now be aligned with changes in environmental, water and land legislation introduced in recent years. Ruslan Baimishev, president of the Kazakhstan Mining Chamber, also highlighted the importance of legislative stability, particularly in tax policy, saying investors require consistency in government decisions. World Bank Senior Mining Specialist Remy Pelon said many countries are reforming their mining sectors to meet growing demand for minerals needed for the global energy transition. At the same time, Pelon warned against overcorrection. “Governments must create conditions for the efficient use of mineral resources in the interests of national development, but it is equally important to preserve a balance between industrial policy, openness to new market players and competitiveness,” he said. “That balance is especially important for countries aiming not only to extract raw materials, but also to develop processing, local manufacturing and technological expertise.” Kazakh officials used the forum to underscore recent legal measures designed to improve investor protections. Arman Khassenov, deputy chairman of the Committee for the Protection of Investors’ Rights under the Prosecutor General’s Office,...

AMM 2026

Ambassador Kazykhan Calls for U.S.–Kazakhstan Critical Minerals Projects at AMM Congress

ASTANA — Ambassador Yerzhan Kazykhan, Kazakhstan’s presidential representative for negotiations with the United States, delivered the opening remarks at the U.S.–Kazakhstan Country Roundtable during the Astana Mining & Metallurgy Congress on June 11, calling for expanding bilateral ties to be turned into practical critical minerals projects. The roundtable brought together U.S. officials, American businesses, and Kazakh counterparts to discuss practical measures for advancing projects in the critical minerals sector. His remarks focused on turning the U.S.–Kazakhstan minerals agenda into projects, investment, offtake agreements, processing capacity, and more resilient supply chains. Kazykhan placed the discussion within President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev’s broader effort to deepen the U.S.–Kazakhstan relationship around energy, supply-chain security, investment, and critical minerals. According to the transcript of his remarks, he referred to the November 6 meeting between Tokayev and U.S. President Donald J. Trump, saying the two leaders had met “to unlock the substantial potential” of what the U.S. State Department had called “A New Era” in bilateral relations. “The strategic understanding reached by our leaders was fully aligned with the national interests of both countries,” Kazykhan said. He said that understanding included support for energy security, supply-chain resilience, and a “shared commitment to strengthening cooperation in energy, rare earths, and other critical minerals.” He argued that the agenda had already moved beyond diplomacy. “You can see these priorities are not abstract,” Kazykhan said. “They are being advanced through concrete partnerships that strengthen industrial capacity, accelerate technological development, and support emerging fields such as artificial intelligence.” Kazykhan presented Kazakhstan as a strategic partner for Washington at a time when the United States and its allies are seeking alternatives to concentrated supply chains for minerals used in defense, energy, advanced manufacturing, and emerging technologies. “Kazakhstan is uniquely positioned to serve as a strategic partner for the United States, one that can offer increased resilience and enhanced competitiveness,” Kazykhan said. He described Kazakhstan as “a reliable and substantial supplier” and “a Middle Power with regional influence, a diversified industrial base, and one of the world’s top 50 economies.” He also pointed to Kazakhstan’s mineral base, saying the country holds top-ten reserves of tungsten, molybdenum, tantalum, nickel, cobalt, and lithium, along with deposits of other critical elements. Kazakhstan is also the world’s largest uranium producer, accounting for about 40% of global output and more than 20% of U.S. natural uranium imports, he said. But Kazykhan’s central argument was that Kazakhstan should not be viewed only as a source of raw materials. He said durable supply-chain security requires processing, refining, and integration into higher-value industrial stages. “Mining alone is not enough,” he said. “True supply-chain security requires processing, refining, and downstream integration.” He added that Kazakhstan “is not a greenfield jurisdiction,” citing its industrial workforce, established producers, export record, and institutional capacity for long-duration resource projects. Kazykhan also linked the minerals agenda to transport and logistics. He said Kazakhstan has been strengthening access to the Caspian Sea and expanding connectivity through the Trans-Caspian and broader East-West corridors, giving it routes to deliver materials...

AMM 2026

U.S. Moves from Dialogue to Action on Critical Minerals in Kazakhstan

ASTANA — David L. Fogel, Assistant Secretary of Commerce and Director General of the United States and Foreign Commercial Service, told delegates at the 16th International Astana Mining & Metallurgy (AMM) Congress in Astana on June 11-12 that the United States is moving from discussion to strategic execution in Central Asia’s critical minerals sector. Fogel’s responsibilities at Commerce include leading the International Trade Administration’s Global Markets unit, which focuses on commercial diplomacy, export promotion, advocacy for U.S. companies, and foreign investment. Speaking in Astana, where the AMM Congress gathered top-level mining, metallurgy, technology, finance, and government leaders, Fogel said the United States had brought a historically large delegation to Kazakhstan, including more than 20 U.S. companies and representatives from across the U.S. government. The AMM Congress is one of the region’s major mining and metallurgy platforms. Fogel framed the visit as part of a broader U.S. strategic push to strengthen supply-chain resilience at a time of heightened global competition over minerals essential to energy, infrastructure, advanced manufacturing, and emerging technologies. Critical minerals, he said, are now among the top priorities for the United States, not only in terms of sourcing, but also processing. That emphasis is consistent with the Trump administration’s wider policy focus on processed critical minerals and derivative products as issues tied to economic security, national security, and America’s industrial base. Fogel placed the visit within the Trump administration’s broader effort to give Central Asia greater strategic attention, particularly as critical minerals, connectivity, and supply-chain resilience move higher on Washington’s agenda. He said the current push reflects sustained engagement from senior U.S. officials, including Ambassador Sergio Gor, U.S. Special Envoy for South and Central Asian Affairs, and is being carried forward in country by the U.S. team in Kazakhstan under U.S. Ambassador Julie Stufft. Fogel emphasized execution, saying talks related to the C5+1 Critical Minerals Dialogue the day before focused on turning a shared vision for cooperation into practical outcomes. “How do we take this vision of cooperation and put it into actionable projects?” he asked. According to Fogel, the objective is to turn plans into tangible ventures that can attract capital, technology, and long-term business participation. Fogel’s point was that the United States is looking for projects that strengthen critical minerals supply chains while building strategic relationships, rather than organizing endless rounds of declarations that lead nowhere. He presented the process as a disciplined commercial and strategic effort of identifying the right opportunities, minimizing risk for companies weighing where to direct their resources, applying consistent international standards, and creating conditions in which American companies can compete. [caption id="attachment_50309" align="aligncenter" width="1774"] Image: TCA[/caption] The practical implication of Fogel’s remarks was that enthusiasm for mineral resources alone is not enough to draw major long-term investment. Companies need reliable mapping, credible surveys, and consistent international standards that allow projects to be assessed and financed. In that sense, geological data and standards are not technical details, but the bridge between mineral potential and bankable projects backed up by solid in-country partners....

AMM 2026

Kazakhstan Stakes Claim as Critical Minerals Processing Hub at AMM 2026

ASTANA — Kazakhstan used the opening of the Astana Mining & Metallurgy Congress 2026 to place its mining and metals sector at the center of a new industrial strategy built around critical minerals, processing, technology, and long-term foreign investment. Addressing more than 1,500 participants from 16 countries, Prime Minister Olzhas Bektenov said Kazakhstan’s economy grew by 6.5% in 2025, while gross domestic product exceeded $300 billion for the first time. He tied that performance to President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev’s course toward a modern economy based on technology, investment, industrial development, and human capital. For international investors, the speech presented Kazakhstan as a resource economy entering its next stage, not as a new market waiting to be discovered. Bektenov emphasized that major projects in subsoil use, metallurgy, and downstream processing require large capital commitments, long investment cycles, strong institutions, predictable regulation, and business confidence. “The world is entering a new industrial era in which the development of energy systems, digital economy, AI, electric vehicles, microelectronics, and aerospace industry depends directly on reliable access to metals and mineral resources,” Bektenov said. He described critical minerals as “the defining resources of the new industrial era,” placing Kazakhstan’s mineral base within the wider competition for inputs used in batteries, semiconductors, energy systems, electric vehicles, microelectronics, aerospace, AI, and the digital economy. Bektenov said Kazakhstan possesses substantial mineral resource potential and ranks among global leaders in reserves of a wide range of minerals. Products from the country’s mining and metals sector, he said, are already in demand across major world markets. He argued that Kazakhstan is not starting from scratch. It has resources, operating mines, metallurgical capacity, export experience, and a government policy aimed at moving more of the value chain inside the country. The most commercially significant announcement concerned exploration. Bektenov said Kazakhstan is implementing a large-scale geological exploration program, with detailed geological mapping expected to exceed two million square kilometers. At Tokayev’s instruction, the state alone plans to invest approximately $470 million in geological exploration between 2026 and 2028, an amount Bektenov described as comparable to total public spending on exploration over the previous two decades. That spending is designed to strengthen the project pipeline and reduce early-stage uncertainty for investors. For mining companies, drilling firms, geological service providers, laboratory operators, equipment suppliers, and data companies, the expansion of geological coverage could create new entry points into Kazakhstan’s mineral sector. Bektenov also pointed to digitalization as part of the government’s effort to modernize the sector. Kazakhstan has established a Unified Subsoil Use Platform that provides 22 public services, supports the issuance of licenses, and monitors the obligations of subsoil users. More than 4.6 million units of primary geological data have been digitized, including materials previously stored on paper, magnetic tapes, and photographic records. The next step, he said, is the integration of artificial intelligence into geological exploration, data analysis, and production management. Bektenov framed this as a shift in the operating model of Kazakhstan’s mining industry, rather than a simple increase in extraction volumes....