• KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00212 0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10543 -0.09%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28530 0%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00212 0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10543 -0.09%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28530 0%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00212 0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10543 -0.09%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28530 0%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00212 0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10543 -0.09%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28530 0%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00212 0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10543 -0.09%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28530 0%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00212 0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10543 -0.09%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28530 0%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00212 0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10543 -0.09%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28530 0%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00212 0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10543 -0.09%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28530 0%

Why Strong Economic Growth in Central Asia Masks Underlying Risks

Central Asian countries are significantly outperforming the global average in GDP growth, largely due to differing economic models across the region. However, rapid expansion does not remove deep structural vulnerabilities.

As early as March, data showed that the combined economies of Central Asian countries grew by nearly 7% in 2025 compared to the previous year. The World Bank estimates regional growth at 6.2%, while the Eurasian Development Bank (EDB) places it at 6.6%. These calculations include Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, and Tajikistan; Turkmenistan is excluded due to limited statistical transparency.

By comparison, growth rates in advanced economies are much lower. The EDB expects around 1.6% growth in the U.S. and approximately 1.1% in the eurozone in 2026, while China’s economy is projected to expand by about 4.6%. Nevertheless, experts note that the region’s economic outlook remains complicated by high inflation, income inequality, and continued dependence on external factors.

Investment activity and domestic demand have been the key drivers of growth, according to the EDB. Kazakhstan recorded its highest growth in 13 years (6.5%), with industry leading the expansion: mining grew by 9.4% and manufacturing by 6.4%. In 2026, the non-resource sector is expected to play a greater role.

Kyrgyzstan has led the region in GDP growth for the third consecutive year: GDP grew by 11.1% in 2025 and by 9% in January 2026. In Uzbekistan, GDP increased by 7.7% in 2025 (up from 6.7% a year earlier), supported by investment, trade, services, and construction. Tajikistan’s GDP rose by 8.4% in 2025, matching the previous year’s performance. Growth continues to be driven by expanding industrial production and strong domestic demand. Early 2026 data suggest this momentum is holding.

Uzbekistan’s Record

In April, the World Bank highlighted Uzbekistan’s resilience to external challenges and strong growth dynamics. According to its updated report, the country’s 2025 GDP growth was revised upward by 1.5 percentage points to 7.7%. The outlook is 6.4% for 2026 and 6.7% for 2027.

Key drivers include high global gold prices, investment inflows, expanded lending, and ongoing structural reforms. Rising household incomes have also played an important role, supported by remittances, which increased by 37% last year to reach $18.9 billion.

By the end of 2025, Uzbekistan ranked among the fastest-growing economies in developing countries in Europe and Central Asia, alongside Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan. The region as a whole is experiencing its highest growth rates in 14 years.

At the same time, analysts point to persistent structural constraints, including a large public sector and the dominance of state-owned enterprises, which hinder private sector development. External risks, including geopolitical instability and potential disruptions in energy and fertilizer supplies, remain significant.

In 2025, Uzbekistan’s GDP exceeded €133 billion, compared to approximately €56 billion nine years earlier. Over the same period, GDP per capita rose from about €1,750 to around €3,220, nearly doubling average income levels.

Investment in fixed capital increased by more than 15% year-on-year in 2025, while export value grew by over 33%. Persistently high global gold prices played a major role: export revenues from gold sales rose by more than 70%.

According to President Shavkat Mirziyoyev, around five million people gained a stable source of income in 2025, and 1.5 million were lifted out of poverty. Consumer indicators also improved, with annual housing purchases reaching approximately 270,000 units and car sales hitting one million units.

However, the World Bank warns that the next stage of growth may prove more challenging.

“Since 2017, Uzbekistan has been considered one of the global leaders in economic reform. Future growth should be based on a strong private sector, accession to the World Trade Organization, and genuinely level playing conditions. Reducing state involvement where private companies can operate more efficiently will help attract investment and create better-quality jobs,” said World Bank economist Pinar Yasar.

Inflation Holds Kazakhstan Back

Kazakhstan remains the largest economy in Central Asia. The oil sector continues to drive growth, while manufacturing, particularly machinery and metallurgy, is gaining momentum, with new plants opening across the country.

“This is primarily due to the stronger-than-expected impact of unlocking investment potential. In addition, industrial production is growing rapidly this year, largely thanks to government measures aimed at economic diversification,” said Aigul Berdigulova, senior analyst at the EDB’s Macroeconomic Analysis Center.

However, inflation stood at around 12.3% last year, eroding purchasing power. Elevated interest rates continue to constrain household consumption.

Kazakhstan’s economy remains heavily dependent on oil and gas, which account for up to 20-25% of GDP, more than 50% of exports, and a significant share of budget revenues. While this structure supports stability during periods of high commodity prices, it leaves the economy vulnerable to external shocks.

According to Qazaq Expert Club analyst Saida Tleuleyeva, diversification potential lies primarily in developing processing industries, particularly petrochemicals. Even partial progress could increase value added by two to three times. Raising manufacturing’s share from 13-14% to 18-20% of GDP could significantly boost output and nearly double non-resource exports from $10-12 billion to over $20 billion.

Transport and logistics are another key area. Development of the Trans-Caspian corridor is already increasing cargo volumes, with capacity nearing 5 million tons and plans to expand to 10 million. With sufficient investment, this route could become a stable source of foreign currency earnings.

Significant potential also remains in the agro-industrial sector, given Kazakhstan’s vast land resources. Mechanical engineering is another underdeveloped area, as much of the equipment used in the extractive sector is still imported.

Kyrgyzstan: Construction Boom and Mortgages

In Kyrgyzstan, construction has been a major growth driver, expanding by 29%. This was fueled by a state mortgage program (“My Home 2021-2026”), which enabled large-scale housing development in Bishkek and other regions. This, in turn, stimulated related industries such as cement, brick, and finishing materials production.

Investment in fixed capital rose by 18.2%, driven largely by domestic investors and public spending on infrastructure, including hydropower, roads, mining, and processing industries. Foreign investment increased by 17.5%.

Amid economic growth, the average monthly nominal wage rose by 19.2%. Even after accounting for inflation, real incomes increased by 12% over six months, supporting strong consumer demand. Inflation remains above 8%.

Analysts note that part of the economic upswing is linked to the reorientation of trade and logistics flows following Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

“For economies with chronic underinvestment, high growth rates often reflect a catch-up phase rather than a structural breakthrough. In such economies, growth of around 6% typically indicates convergence, whereas in developed countries, 1.5-2% is already considered high,” said Kubat Rakhimov, an infrastructure development expert.

He added that GDP growth alone is not sufficient to assess living standards; more meaningful indicators include real disposable income and labor productivity.

Tajikistan: Growth Across Key Sectors

Tajikistan’s GDP grew by 8.4% in 2025, driven in part by high gold prices, its main export commodity. Significant investments were made in infrastructure, particularly the Rogun hydropower plant. Rising remittances from labor migrants have further supported domestic demand.

For the second consecutive year, the economy expanded by 8.4%, reaching nearly $18 billion by the end of 2025.

All three key sectors, accounting for about 70% of the economy, are growing: agriculture (23% of GDP), industry (22%), and trade (14%).

Agricultural output increased by 9.5% year-on-year in 2025, with growth across major segments. Crop production, which generates two-thirds of sector revenue, recorded higher yields for all major crops.

Turkmenistan: Limited Transparency

Turkmenistan remains one of the most closed economies in the world, and available data is largely based on official statements and indirect estimates.

In February, President Serdar Berdimuhamedov reported GDP growth of 6.3% in 2025. According to official figures, industrial output grew by 1.8%, trade by 9.6%, and agriculture by 7%. Investment increased by 6%, and around 7,000 jobs were created.

Earlier, the country’s minister of finance and economy reported that GDP exceeded $68.7 billion in 2024.

Persistent Risks Behind Strong Growth

Despite strong headline growth, World Bank data highlights significant income disparities across the region. GDP per capita in Kazakhstan stands at around $14,154, compared to approximately $3,162 in Uzbekistan and about $2,420 in Kyrgyzstan. In the U.S., that figure exceeds $84,000.

Experts warn that the current levels of Central Asian economic growth remain vulnerable to external shocks, including a slowdown in China, shifts in global demand for hydrocarbons and metals, and geopolitical instability.

Analysts also forecast a cooling period as early as 2027, with GDP growth potentially slowing to 4-5%.

For now, the region faces a critical challenge: converting rapid growth into sustainable productivity gains, rising real incomes, and stronger institutions. Only then can strong GDP figures translate into lasting improvements in living standards.

Rosatom to Neutralize Hazardous Chemical Waste at Plant in Kyrgyzstan

Rosatom is set to begin work to eliminate hazardous chemicals stockpiled at the Kristall plant in Tash-Kumyr, in Kyrgyzstan’s Jalal-Abad region.

The Kristall plant, built in 1989 as a key facility of the Soviet electronics industry to produce polycrystalline silicon, has since become a high-risk environmental site. Hazardous chemical waste accumulated on its premises poses a threat to both the environment and public health. The plant has been bankrupt since 2010.

The site contains 49 tanks holding a total of 155 tons of hazardous chemical residues, including trichlorosilane and silicon tetrachloride.

In October 2024, Rosatom conducted a technical audit of the facility, revealing the deteriorated condition of the storage tanks. Prolonged inactivity has left the aging infrastructure in poor shape, increasing the risk of structural failure and depressurization.

On April 14, in Bishkek, Rosatom and the Kyrgyz Ministry of Emergency Situations discussed technological solutions for neutralizing the chemicals.

According to Rosatom, the first phase of the cleanup is scheduled for completion by the end of 2026. This stage will focus on bringing the chemical storage tanks to a safe condition. It also involves the installation of a dual emergency protection system and the introduction of independent environmental monitoring.

The proposed neutralization methods have been approved by the Kyrgyz Ministry of Natural Resources, Ecology, and Technical Supervision.

By the end of 2026, Rosatom aims to eliminate the risk of leaks and uncontrolled emissions by stabilizing the tanks and ensuring safe conditions for further handling of the hazardous substances.

In 2027, the project will enter its second phase, focusing on the on-site neutralization of the chemicals as the preferred solution.

Kyrgyz Emergency Situations Minister Kanatbek Chynybayev said the situation at the Kristall plant remains environmentally challenging and requires a comprehensive response.

“Our primary objective is to eliminate potential health risks to residents of Tash-Kumyr and lift the state of emergency in the area. Rosatom’s expertise has been engaged to address this issue. As part of this collaboration, a technological strategy has been developed that will allow the threats to be neutralized within the specified timeframe and return the site to a safe condition,” he said.

Kazakhstan Climbs 13 Positions in the World Bank Human Capital Ranking

Kazakhstan has significantly improved its position in the World Bank’s Human Capital Index Plus (HCI+), rising by 13 places to rank 42nd out of 161 countries by the end of 2025. The index evaluates human capital development, including health, education, and workforce skills, all of which directly influence economic growth and investment attractiveness.

Charles McLean, founder of Borderless Consulting Group, shared his assessment of the factors behind this progress in an interview with Inbusiness.kz.

According to McLean, Kazakhstan’s rise reflects not only quantitative improvements but also qualitative changes in the country’s socio-economic landscape.

“Kazakhstan’s rise by 13 positions is a highly positive and significant signal for the country’s socio-economic development, primarily driven by reforms implemented by President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev,” he said.

He noted that improved indicators point to the emergence of a healthier, better-educated, and more skilled workforce, contributing to higher productivity and supporting sustainable long-term growth. Stronger positions in international rankings also enhance investor confidence and reinforce economic resilience.

McLean identified two main drivers of progress: education and healthcare.

In education, investment has increased at all levels from preschool to higher education. Improvements in teacher training, the quality of school education, and the alignment of national testing systems with international standards have contributed to higher skill levels across the population.

Positive changes are also evident in the healthcare system. Enhanced medical infrastructure, expanded preventive programs, and improved access to healthcare services have contributed to rising life expectancy and lower infant mortality.

McLean also highlighted Kazakhstan’s shift toward a more integrated approach to human capital development. This includes the digitalization of educational institutions and the expansion of vocational training programs.

Additional emphasis is being placed on developing professional skills, delivering both short-term employment gains and long-term improvements in labor productivity.

“If the current course is maintained, Kazakhstan can not only strengthen its position but also become one of the leaders among emerging markets in terms of human capital development,” McLean said.

Given current trends, he assessed further improvements in Kazakhstan’s position in the HCI+ ranking to be realistic. Continued investment in human capital is expected to drive productivity growth, improve living standards, and enhance the country’s global competitiveness.

Kazakhstan Climbs 30 Positions in Clean Energy Investment Ranking

Kazakhstan has significantly improved its position in the international Climatescope ranking of clean energy investment attractiveness, rising by 30 places over the past eight years, according to the Ministry of Energy.

The country moved from 54th place in 2017 to 24th in 2025 among emerging markets, reflecting the expansion of renewable energy and improvements in the investment climate.

The Climatescope ranking assesses countries’ attractiveness for investment in clean energy and decarbonization, analyzing policies, infrastructure, and market potential across more than 100 nations. The study is compiled by BloombergNEF, a research unit of Bloomberg specializing in data and forecasts on the energy transition, new transport technologies, and commodity markets.

According to the ministry, Kazakhstan’s improved standing is driven by increased investment in renewable energy projects and consistent state support for green energy. The country has introduced competitive auctions and guaranteed power purchase mechanisms, which have helped attract international investors.

“Kazakhstan is making significant progress in the development of clean energy. Growing investor interest and improved market conditions indicate that the country is becoming one of the regional leaders in attracting capital for low-carbon technologies,” the ministry said.

Major international companies involved in projects in Kazakhstan include TotalEnergies, China Power, Masdar, and China Energy.

Looking ahead, Kazakhstan plans to commission more than 8 GW of new renewable energy capacity by 2035, which is expected to diversify the energy mix and strengthen the resilience of the national power system.

Among Central Asian countries, Uzbekistan achieved the strongest result in the 2025 ranking, placing 23rd.

As previously reported by The Times of Central Asia, Kazakhstan presented its green energy transition strategy at an international forum in the United Kingdom.

In addition, the government aims to eliminate the electricity deficit and begin exports as early as 2027.

Tokayev Congratulates Péter Magyar on Victory in Hungary’s Parliamentary Elections

Kazakhstan’s President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev has sent a congratulatory telegram to Péter Magyar, leader of the TISZA party, following his victory in Hungary’s parliamentary elections.

According to the presidential press service, Tokayev noted that the election results reflect a high level of public trust in the TISZA party and its program and expressed confidence in Hungary’s continued sustainable development.

Tokayev emphasised that Astana attaches great importance to strengthening its strategic partnership with Budapest, reaffirming readiness to expand bilateral cooperation for the benefit of both countries. He also wished Magyar success in his new role, along with prosperity and well-being for the Hungarian people.

So far, there have been no reports of congratulatory messages from other Central Asian leaders addressed to Hungary’s new leadership.

Hungary’s political transition following the defeat of Viktor Orbán’s party and his resignation has drawn attention not only in the European Union and the U.S., but also in Central Asia, where Budapest has actively developed economic and energy cooperation in recent years.

During Orbán’s tenure, Hungary expanded engagement with Central Asian states, seeking to diversify energy supply sources and reduce dependence on Russian oil and gas. In this context, resource-rich Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, and Turkmenistan emerged as key partners.

One key question now is whether the country’s new leadership will maintain this course, including cooperation in energy, investment, and trade. Experts note that the durability of these ties will depend on the foreign policy priorities of Magyar’s government and its approach to relations with the European Union and partners beyond it.

Beyond the Belt and Road: China’s New Playbook in Central Asia

In the Kyzylorda Region, near the town of Shieli, the silos and conveyor belts of a Chinese-backed plant rise out of the fine brown dust that dominates the landscape. It is the kind of project the Belt and Road was supposed to deliver in Central Asia: heavy industry, fixed capital, and a visible mark on the landscape. But it is also a reminder that China’s role in the region has become narrower, more contested, and less sweeping than the old rhetoric suggested.

In photographs, the Gezhouba Cement Plant looks like a self-contained industrial island on the steppe. For nearby villagers, it became something else: a source of jobs and local prestige for some, but also of years of complaints about dust clouds and whether the state was quicker to defend a flagship Chinese-backed project than the people living beside it.

Projects like the plant in Shieli also help explain why views of China across Central Asia remain mixed. Beijing is seen as a source of trade, investment, and technology, but that promise is tempered in some places by concerns over transparency, environmental costs, and who really benefits when a project arrives.

China has become Central Asia’s dominant trading partner, but investment has not kept pace with the surge in commerce. The gap says a lot about how Beijing now works in the region: with a sharper focus on sectors that matter to its long-term influence.

In 2025, trade in goods between China and the five Central Asian states reached $106.3 billion, up 12% year on year. Chinese exports to the region totaled $71.2 billion, while imports from Central Asia reached $35.1 billion. Trade has grown fast enough to reshape the region’s external balance, but long-term investment has been far more selective. Over 2005–2025, the five Central Asian states accounted for about 3% of China’s global overseas investment and construction total.

The picture changes once direct investment is separated from trade and construction contracts. China’s FDI stock in the five Central Asian states stood at about $36 billion by mid-2025. Roughly 90% was concentrated in Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, and Turkmenistan. The structure of that capital has also changed. Extractive industries still accounted for 46% of the portfolio, but manufacturing and energy together made up more than one third, and greenfield projects rose from 43% to 60%. China has not poured money into Central Asia on the scale once implied by early Belt and Road rhetoric. Instead, it has invested in sectors that strengthen its industrial position.

Kazakhstan remains at the center of this relationship. It is China’s biggest commercial partner in Central Asia, and the main destination for Chinese capital in the region. Kazakhstan-China trade reached $43.8 billion in 2024. The country’s portfolio of projects with Chinese participation includes 224 ventures worth about $66.4 billion. Some are still at the planning stage, but the range of projects is telling. Recent developments have included a hydrogen energy technology innovation center in Almaty and a large wind farm with electricity storage. Kazakhstan still sells raw materials to China, but it also wants Chinese capital, technology, and industrial capacity at home.

Uzbekistan, meanwhile, has become the fastest-moving part of the regional story. Over the past decade, Chinese FDI in Uzbekistan grew by $10.4 billion, lifting the country’s share of China’s Central Asian investment portfolio from 1% to 16%. Bilateral trade has also kept rising, with both sides setting a target of $20 billion. As of January 1, 2026, Uzbekistan had 5,044 companies with Chinese capital. That figure had risen to 5,257 by March 16, 2026. Uzbekistan wants more factories, more processing, and more export-oriented production, and Chinese firms have become central to that push.

Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan show a different pattern. Their economies are smaller and their bargaining power is weaker, but Chinese trade and investment are still deeply embedded in key sectors. In Kyrgyzstan, China held the largest share of foreign trade in 2025. Accumulated Chinese FDI in the Kyrgyz economy reached $2.1 billion at the end of 2025. In Tajikistan, the accumulated volume of Chinese investment had reached nearly $4 billion by early 2025, and about 70% of that total was direct capital. In both countries, Chinese money has gone into mining, infrastructure, energy, and border development. That gives Beijing more weight than the headline numbers suggest.

Turkmenistan remains a special case because gas still dominates the relationship. Chinese capital is present, and Turkmenistan is one of the three countries that make up about 90% of China’s Central Asian FDI stock. However, the commercial picture is much more concentrated than in Kazakhstan or Uzbekistan. Trade turnover between China and Turkmenistan reached $10.6 billion in 2024, up 11% from 2023, but this growth is still built chiefly on one commodity. That leaves Turkmenistan more exposed to a single-channel relationship than its neighbors to the east and north.

Trade and investment measure different kinds of power. Trade can rise quickly when Chinese goods are cheap, routes are open, and Central Asian markets need machinery, electronics, and consumer goods. Investment moves more slowly because it depends on politics, regulation, and returns. So even if Central Asia remains a modest part of China’s global capital map, parts of the region can still become deeply tied to Chinese demand, finance, equipment, and project delivery.

This is why the old Belt and Road image of limitless Chinese spending no longer fits. Beijing’s overseas capital has become more disciplined, and the region has become more demanding. Central Asian governments want local jobs, more processing at home, and projects tied to energy security, manufacturing, and transport resilience. China wants secure supplies, export markets, and reliable overland routes across Eurasia. The overlap is strong, but not unlimited. Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan are both deepening links with other partners at the same time, including Europe, the United States, and the Gulf states. They want Chinese capital, but not exclusivity. That multi-vector outlook is now central to the region’s economic policies.

In Central Asia, China’s presence can no longer be measured by the old Belt and Road spectacle. It is better read in the projects themselves: a cement plant on the edge of a village, a dry port at a border, a logistics complex taking shape outside Tashkent. The material footprint is real. It is just more focused, strategic, and more politically negotiated than the slogans once suggested.