At the recent Shanghai Cooperation Organization summit in Tianjin, China inaugurated two new vocational centers in Kazakhstan under the Luban Workshop initiative. The move highlights the growing emphasis on technical education and skills development across the region. Kazakhstan’s first Luban Workshop was launched in 2023 at Serikbayev East Kazakhstan Technical University, creating a platform to advance engineering and technical training.
The program has since expanded with a second workshop at the Gumilyov Eurasian National University in Astana and a third at the Academy of Logistics and Transport in Almaty. This China-led program aims to share China’s educational expertise and technical resources with partner countries, with a particular focus on cultivating a new generation of skilled workers in developing economies.
The workshops are not only a vehicle for workforce training but also a symbol of the Belt and Road Initiative’s people-to-people exchange dimension. By encouraging social and educational connections, China is seeking to complement government-to-government cooperation with deeper societal ties.
The choice of Tianjin for the ceremony is not a coincidence. The Luban Workshop concept originated in this city and has been actively promoted by the Tianjin municipal government. Equally notable is Kazakhstan’s central role in the program’s expansion. The Kazakh government has expressed consistent support for Chinese-led educational partnerships, underlining the importance of vocational training to its national development agenda.
During his visit to a Luban Workshop in Kazakhstan in February 2024, President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev praised the initiative, saying, “I am deeply appreciative of the contributions made by Chinese universities. They have executed exemplary work. I hope to see more workshops like this in Kazakhstan.”
The expansion of China’s Luban Workshop initiative offers distinct benefits for both China and Kazakhstan. For China, the workshops help shift perceptions of its educational initiatives. Unlike the Confucius Institutes, which focus on cultural and language promotion, the Luban Workshops emphasize practical, in-demand skills in fields such as manufacturing and technology. This approach allows China to project a more pragmatic and development-oriented image, fostering goodwill in a way that is less vulnerable to geopolitical criticism.
A second key benefit lies in the realm of soft power. By delivering tangible skills and opportunities, Luban Workshops can positively influence public attitudes toward China in Central Asia. In Kazakhstan, such initiatives not only support technical education but also help frame Chinese investments as beneficial for local communities. Over time, this contributes to strengthening government-to-government ties and broader people-to-people connections, enhancing China’s long-term influence in the region.
For Kazakhstan, the Luban Workshops provide benefits by helping to build a pool of technically skilled human capital. This directly supports the country’s industrial goals and broader economic development agenda. A more qualified workforce also enables local citizens to participate more actively in Chinese-backed projects in Kazakhstan, thereby boosting local employment.
One of the recurring criticisms of China’s overseas investment projects has been the limited transfer of knowledge and skills. In many cases, local workers are confined to low-skilled, manual roles, while Chinese nationals occupy managerial and technical positions. The Luban Workshops aim to bridge this gap by offering specialized vocational training that equips Kazakh workers with the competencies to enter Chinese companies and progress into higher-skilled, potentially managerial roles over time.
The most distinctive advantage of the Luban Workshops is that they do not follow a one-size-fits-all curriculum. Instead, training programs are tailored to align with the host country’s national priorities. For example, Kazakhstan’s first Luban Workshop introduced courses in vehicle maintenance, electric vehicle technology, automotive engines, and advanced driver assistance systems.
These fields align closely with Kazakhstan’s industrial development plan, which prioritizes investment in vehicle manufacturing and the localization of production. In this way, the workshops train skilled technicians while also building a broader pool of human capital that supports Kazakhstan’s long-term development strategies.
Despite the clear benefits, the expansion of the Luban Workshops also presents certain risks for Kazakhstan. The workshops are built around Chinese technologies, equipment, and technical standards. While this enables local trainees to gain hands-on experience with advanced tools, it simultaneously embeds Chinese technological frameworks within Kazakhstan’s educational and industrial systems.
Given the scale of Chinese investment across multiple sectors in Kazakhstan—ranging from renewable energy to critical minerals and waste management—this dynamic could, over time, lock the country into a Chinese-dominated technological ecosystem. Training a workforce to operate, maintain, and innovate specifically on Chinese platforms may further increase demand for Chinese products, spare parts, and critical technologies.
This can create a self-reinforcing cycle that, as more Kazakh industries adopt Chinese systems, reliance on Chinese suppliers and expertise deepens. While this dynamic strengthens China’s position as a key economic partner, it also risks fostering a form of technological dependency that could constrain Kazakhstan’s long-term autonomy in industrial and technological decision-making.
In the short to medium term, the expansion of the Luban Workshops offers Kazakhstan valuable opportunities to strengthen human capital, support economic development, and ease public concerns about Chinese investment by demonstrating tangible local benefits.
The central challenge for Kazakhstan, therefore, is to harness the advantages of skills development and vocational training while carefully managing the strategic risks of overreliance on a single external partner.
