• KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00194 0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10879 -0.18%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 -0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28571 0.28%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00194 0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10879 -0.18%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 -0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28571 0.28%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00194 0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10879 -0.18%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 -0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28571 0.28%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00194 0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10879 -0.18%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 -0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28571 0.28%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00194 0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10879 -0.18%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 -0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28571 0.28%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00194 0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10879 -0.18%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 -0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28571 0.28%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00194 0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10879 -0.18%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 -0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28571 0.28%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00194 0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10879 -0.18%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 -0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28571 0.28%
15 December 2025

Uzbekistan and Pakistan Agree to Increase Trade Volume by $2 Billion

Uzbekistan and Pakistan have agreed to expand trade, transport, and cultural cooperation, following talks between Uzbek President Shavkat Mirziyoyev and Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif in Tashkent on February 26.

During the meeting, both leaders expressed satisfaction with the growing bilateral relationship. In 2024, trade volume between the two countries exceeded $400 million, and the number of joint ventures reached 130. Additionally, direct flights between Tashkent and Lahore have been resumed.

The two sides discussed plans to boost trade to $2 billion and simplify customs procedures under a recently adopted roadmap. Key areas of cooperation include pharmaceuticals, agriculture, mining, and textiles.

Transport connectivity was a major focus of the discussions. Freight traffic through the Uzbekistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan corridor has increased fivefold in recent years, and the two countries agreed to establish a joint transport and logistics company. They also pledged to advance the Trans-Afghanistan railway project, which aims to enhance regional trade routes.

The two governments also committed to expanding cultural and educational exchanges. Agreements were reached on mutual cultural weeks, tourism development, and cooperation in science, technology, youth policy, and security.

To strengthen long-term cooperation, Uzbekistan and Pakistan will establish a High Council for Strategic Partnership, with its first meeting scheduled for next year.

EDB to Invest in Kazakhstan’s Energy Projects and Polyethylene Plant Construction

The Eurasian Development Bank (EDB) will continue financing strategic energy, transport, and industrial projects in Kazakhstan, with a focus on digital technologies and innovation, according to Nikolai Podguzov, Chairman of the EDB Management Board. Podguzov made the announcement during a meeting with Kazakhstan’s Prime Minister Olzhas Bektenov on February 26.

The EDB is a multilateral development bank that supports economic and infrastructure projects in its six member states: Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Russia, and Tajikistan.

According to Podguzov, in 2025, the EDB plans to invest in socially significant projects in Kazakhstan, including:

  • Expansion and modernization of combined heat and power plants in the country’s central and eastern regions.
  • Construction of a polyethylene plant.
  • Development of the 545 MW Altyn Dala solar power plant.

In 2024, the EDB allocated nearly $1.4 billion to projects in Kazakhstan, bringing its total investment in the country over the past three years to $3.6 billion. This reflects Kazakhstan’s prominent share in the EDB’s investment portfolio.

Bektenov reaffirmed Kazakhstan’s interest in deepening cooperation with the EDB, particularly in the energy and utilities sectors.

“The Eurasian Development Bank is an important partner for Kazakhstan. Last year, the bank’s investment in our economy grew by nearly 40%, and its loan portfolio in Kazakhstan increased to 63.4% of the bank’s total loan portfolio. We are interested in expanding our cooperation on mutually beneficial terms and unlocking new opportunities in both traditional and emerging areas,” the prime minister stated.

Kyrgyzstan Faces Labor Shortages Amid Growing Return Migration

As of February 1, 2025, Kyrgyzstan had 6,305 job vacancies, with the highest demand for blue-collar workers, according to the Ministry of Labor, Social Security, and Migration.

The official unemployment rate currently stands at 1.8%. A total of 69,300 people have sought assistance from the employment service, with 49,800 officially registered as unemployed. Since the beginning of the year, 12,246 citizens have applied for job placement, and 1,283 have successfully secured employment.

To enhance job seekers’ competitiveness in the labor market, the employment service has introduced training programs for in-demand professions. These include computer operation, sales, cooking, cosmetology, hairdressing, manicuring, massage therapy, makeup artistry, translation, accounting, sewing, driving, electric and gas welding, plumbing, and beekeeping.

Over the past three decades, hundreds of thousands of Kyrgyz citizens have migrated abroad for work, primarily to Russia. However, in recent years, return migration has been rising due to Russia’s economic downturn, stricter regulations, and increasing anti-immigrant sentiment toward Central Asians.

In response to this trend, the Kyrgyz government has prioritized establishing new industrial enterprises to create job opportunities for returning labor migrants.

Proposal to Ban Sex Change Operations in Kazakhstan

Kazakhstan’s Mazhilis (Parliament) Deputy Magerram Magerramov has proposed a ban on sex change operations, arguing that such procedures contradict national culture, traditions, and common sense.

Magerramov stressed the need to preserve traditional family values and questioned Kazakhstan’s legal framework, which currently allows gender reassignment for individuals diagnosed with gender dysphoria.

“According to the Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan ‘On the Health of the People and the Health Care System’, citizens over 21 years old who do not have mental or behavioral disorders can change their gender identity. However, the very term ‘gender identity disorder’ already implies the presence of a certain deviation,” he said.

The deputy argued that if a person has no physical abnormality but is diagnosed with an identity disorder, it should be classified as a mental or behavioral condition rather than grounds for medical intervention.

“Interfering with a healthy body through hormone therapy and surgical procedures cannot be justified when it comes to mental or behavioral disorders. It is an attempt to bring the body in line with the subjective perception of reality, which, in my opinion, is unacceptable,” he added.

Magerramov also expressed concerns about the impact on social norms, saying that gender transition was influenced by ideas unacceptable to Kazakh culture.

The World Health Organization (WHO), however, removed transgender identity from the list of mental illnesses in its International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) in 2019.

Magerramov’s speech is not the first time he has criticized what he refers to as “Western values.” Earlier, he accused foreign sponsors, particularly USAID, of funding women’s marches and LGBT events in Almaty.

In addition, his colleague from the People’s Party of Kazakhstan, MP Irina Smirnova, has proposed a law on foreign agents, which would require media and NGOs to disclose sources of foreign funding.

Kazakhstan’s Rare Earth Ambitions Hindered by Investment and Control Challenges

Kazakhstan holds significant reserves of rare metals and rare earth elements, sometimes referred to as the “new oil” due to their increasing importance in global industries. However, experts say the country remains far from becoming a major supplier, as geopolitical tensions and a lack of large-scale investment continue to hinder development.

Global Context: Rare Earth Metals in Geopolitics

U.S. President Donald Trump has called for a rare-earth deal with Ukraine, raising international public interest in these minerals. While the specifics of the deal remain unclear, Trump has estimated its potential value at a trillion dollars. Meanwhile, Russia, which holds the world’s fourth-largest rare earth reserves, has expressed interest in cooperating with the U.S. in this sector.

Experts argue that large-scale mining operations in Ukraine are currently unprofitable and impractical. The rare metal sector includes 60 elements, such as lithium, titanium, beryllium, gallium, and tungsten, while rare-earth metals include 17 elements, such as scandium, yttrium, and lanthanides. Their high production costs, complex extraction process, and long payback periods have made large-scale commercial extraction difficult despite growing global demand.

Is Kazakhstan a Promising Market?

China remains the dominant global producer of rare earth metals, followed by Brazil, India, Australia, and Russia. Despite its extensive natural resource base in oil, gas, uranium, and non-ferrous metals, Kazakhstan has yet to prioritize rare-earth extraction.

However, international interest in Kazakhstan’s deposits is growing. France, Germany, and South Korea have already initiated exploration projects in the country. Germany’s HMS Bergbau AG, in collaboration with Qazaq Lithium, is developing lithium deposits in East Kazakhstan Oblast (EKO). Meanwhile, South Korea’s KIGAM has conducted exploration at the Bakennoye lithium deposit, leading to a memorandum of cooperation. The U.S. Embassy in Kazakhstan has also announced upcoming mining and processing projects for critical materials, such as lithium and titanium, involving American companies.

President Tokayev has stated that Kazakhstan’s subsoil contains 50,000 to 100,000 tons of lithium, but substantial investment in exploration and development is required. Kazakhstan already holds an 11% share of the global titanium market, rising to more than 20% in the aerospace industry.

Newly identified rare earth deposits were announced by the government in early 2025, totaling 2.6 million tons, including 400,000 tons of tungsten and 500,000 tons of niobium.

Calls for Stronger State Control

As international interest in Kazakhstan’s resources grows, concerns about foreign control over strategic assets have intensified. Financial analyst Rasul Rysmambetov has warned that major international players, particularly from Russia, may seek to dominate Kazakhstan’s rare-earth sector. “Several large Russian companies already operate in Kazakhstan. It is crucial to ensure that control over these resources remains in the hands of the state,” he said.

Rysmambetov has proposed the creation of a state agency for strategic assets or expanding the jurisdiction of existing institutions, such as the National Security Committee and the Ministry of Finance. He also suggested that sales of strategic resources should require oversight from the Security Council or Parliament.

“We can expect attempts by foreign firms, particularly Russian and Chinese companies, to acquire major Kazakh mining assets. The U.S. is unlikely to compete directly, but its companies may be indirectly involved,” Rysmambetov added.

Experts believe that unused mining waste from Kazakhstan’s industrial sector could also contain significant amounts of rare-earth elements, providing an alternative path to increasing production.

Rare Earth Metals: Economics vs. Politics

Economist and political analyst Peter Svoyk argues that geopolitical uncertainty remains the biggest obstacle to investment in Kazakhstan’s rare-earth sector.

“Mining rare earth metals is labor-intensive, expensive, and requires long-term planning. Just exploration, feasibility studies, and equipment installation can take up to ten years. Investors will only enter the market if they have confidence their projects will remain stable for at least 25-30 years,” Svoyk explained, adding that current geopolitical shifts are delaying new investment across the world.

“For the next 5-10 years, serious investments in rare earth metals will be limited. Instead, countries will focus on strengthening their existing supply chains and securing resources within their geopolitical blocs,” he said.

Svoyk also downplayed recent geopolitical announcements involving rare earth deals by the U.S. and Russia, arguing that they are more about securing strategic influence than about actual mining projects.

“For Kazakhstan, discussions about increasing rare earth extraction have been ongoing for 15 years, with President Tokayev pushing for progress over the last five years. Yet, large-scale development remains stalled, as the sector requires massive financial and technological investment,” Svoyk concluded.

According to the International Energy Agency (IEA), global demand for lithium has tripled over the past five years, while demand for cobalt has increased by 70% and nickel by 40%. Kazakhstan’s subsoil contains 99 of the 118 elements in the periodic table, meaning that if investment challenges are addressed, the country could become a key supplier of critical and rare-earth metals to global markets.

A Blow to the CPC: Geopolitical Intrigue Surrounding the Pipeline

More than a week has passed since Ukrainian drones attacked the Kropotkinskaya oil refinery, part of the Caspian Pipeline Consortium (CPC) system. However, the incident remains a topic of heated debate in Kazakhstan.

What Happened?

On February 17, the Kropotkinskaya oil pumping station, located in Kavkazsky district, Krasnodar Krai, was targeted by multiple UAVs carrying explosives and metal fragments. While there were no casualties, the facility sustained damage and was taken out of service.

Oil transportation through the Tengiz-Novorossiysk pipeline has since been rerouted via a bypass system, ensuring that shipments from the CPC Marine Terminal continue as normal.

On February 20-21, a Kazakh delegation, including Daniyar Berlibayev, special representative for the CPC project from KazMunayGas, and Yerbolat Mendybayev, Director of Transportation and Logistics at KazMunayGas, visited the Kropotkinskaya station alongside CPC Deputy General Director Hakim Kasymov to assess the damage​.

At a CPC shareholders’ meeting in Abu Dhabi on February 25-26, CEO Nikolay Gorban presented a report on the extent of the damage, equipment dismantling progress, and contractor mobilization status. According to the CPC press service, shareholders pledged full support for repair work, which is expected to take approximately two months​.

Kazakh Debate: Is Ukraine to Blame?

While CPC shareholders, including entities from Kazakhstan, Russia, Europe, and the United States, treated the issue as a technical problem, Kazakh public discourse took a different turn, led by Mazhilis deputies.

Parliamentarian Nikita Shatalov questioned Ukraine’s motivations on his Telegram channel:

“The Ukrainian side could not have been unaware that 90% of the oil transported through the pipeline is Kazakh, extracted from Tengiz, with revenues benefiting Western companies exporting to the EU. The pipeline is international, with KazMunayGas, Chevron, ExxonMobil, and Italy’s Eni as shareholders. This attack was clearly intended to damage Kazakhstan’s economic interests.”

Shatalov emphasized Kazakhstan’s neutral stance in the Ukraine-Russia war, pointing out that diplomatic contacts between Astana and Kyiv have continued at the highest levels, including President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev’s engagement with Volodymyr Zelensky.

“Those responsible for this attack on an international consortium must be punished. Kazakhstan must demand accountability from Ukraine for the damage inflicted and the threat to bilateral relations.”​

His stance was echoed by Mazhilis deputy Marat Bashimov, who called the attack a “direct assault on Kazakhstan’s interests” in a Facebook post:

“The Ukrainian side knew exactly how strategically vital the CPC pipeline is for Kazakh oil exports.”​

Bashimov argued that Kazakhstan has always upheld neutrality, supported diplomatic resolution efforts, and even refused to recognize the self-proclaimed Donetsk and Luhansk republics.

Kazakh Debate: Is Russia to Blame?

Not all deputies agreed. Mazhilisman Yermurat Bapi strongly rejected demands for Ukrainian compensation, arguing that Kazakhstan has no moral or legal grounds to make such a claim:

“For more than three years, Ukraine has been fighting for survival against an aggressor that invaded its territory. As part of this war, Ukraine has the right to choose its defense strategies.”

Bapi went further, blaming Kazakhstan’s overreliance on Russian infrastructure for the crisis:

“The CPC pipeline was a strategic mistake of ‘Old Kazakhstan.’ Betting exclusively on Russia, a country with an aggressive foreign policy, was always a risky decision.”​

Expert Analysis: The Bigger Picture

Political scientist Daniyar Ashimbayev criticized the polarized debate, particularly arguments claiming the attack was “not Kazakhstan’s concern”:

“It’s amusing to watch certain analysts downplay the attack on the CPC as an ‘accident.’ Let’s not forget that the CPC was initiated by Chevron, which saw the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan (BTC) pipeline as too risky and expensive.”​

As tensions rise, the geopolitical intrigue surrounding the attack on the CPC continues to unfold.