The arrest of the founder of the popular Telegram messaging app, Pavel Durov, in Paris on August 24 on charges of illegal activities including enabling drug trafficking, crimes against minors, and fraud has caused public discussion and unease in Uzbekistan, where use of the platform is widespread.
Durov’s visit to Uzbekistan in June highlighted the platform’s deep integration into daily life in the country. “Uzbekistan loves Telegram: over 70% of the country’s 37 million people are on Telegram, and their entire economy is run on our platform – every business in the country has a Telegram bot or channel. We are proud of this popularity and love Uzbekistan,” Durov stated during his visit.
Across the nation, people are now worried that Telegram may be switched off, and are talking and writing about the need to choose an alternative messenger to share files and communicate. Comments such as “Free Durov” can be found under an abundance of news and social media posts, whilst another group of users believes that such an extensive network cannot be destroyed so easily.
Political scientist Hamid Sadiq told the Firkat analytical program that Durov’s arrest could be part of a more extensive planned program. Describing Durov as Telegram’s “face” and his brother Nikolai as its “brain,” Sadiq noted that no one has yet been able to crack Telegram’s encryption, and today, the messenger continues to work without bans in Russia, Ukraine, Uzbekistan, and even China.
The political scientist describes Durov as an “anarchist,” unlike Mark Zuckerberg, Elon Musk, and Steve Jobs. Stating that Durov disagrees with Putin’s regime and pointing to the conflict with Vkontakte in Russia in 2014, Sadiq states that he considers the accusations against Durov to be absurd, and that Durov was granted French citizenship in 2021 “for his great political services.”
As the situation develops, the impact of Durov’s arrest on Telegram’s future remains unclear. Yesterday, the Times of Central Asia reported on the reaction to this event in Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan.
Both the Russian and Ukrainian military use Telegram, with Russia’s war machine particularly reliant, and any cracks in its encryption could prove particularly disastrous to Russia’s war effort. However, as Telegram messages are not end-to-end encrypted as they are in Signal and WhatsApp – meaning they can be read by Telegram’s staff – the platform has been left open to requests to cooperate in the dissemination of data to state actors. It seems that what sets Telegram apart, attempting to bridge the gap between being a messenger app and a social media platform, may prove to be its downfall.
As this story develops, it appears the public in Central Asia are right to have cause for concern.
