• KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00192 -0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10849 0.37%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28571 0.28%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00192 -0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10849 0.37%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28571 0.28%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00192 -0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10849 0.37%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28571 0.28%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00192 -0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10849 0.37%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28571 0.28%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00192 -0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10849 0.37%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28571 0.28%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00192 -0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10849 0.37%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28571 0.28%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00192 -0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10849 0.37%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28571 0.28%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00192 -0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10849 0.37%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28571 0.28%
11 December 2025

OCA Magazine Shines Spotlight on Education in Eurasia

The latest edition of OCA Magazine (UK) focuses on the challenges and opportunities facing education in Central Asia, the CIS, and neighbouring regions. The special issue, OCA Magazine: Education, explores digital transformation, women’s access to higher education, and the drive to modernise universities in a fast-changing global environment.

The special edition includes success stories from Kazakhstan’s Al-Farabi Kazakh National University and Saken Seifullin Kazakh Agrotechnical Research University, where AI, digital campuses, and international double-degree programmes are reshaping learning. The issue also features insights from British tourism expert, Sophie Ibbotson, who predicts that by 2033, tourism in Uzbekistan could generate over 290,000 direct jobs, making hospitality and creative education a national priority.

The Methodica School and Tashkent International School, pioneers of innovative and multicultural learning, are also in the spotlight, as well as Tajikistan’s cultural renaissance, where music education and the work of composer Tolibkhon Shakhidi exemplify the fusion of tradition and modernisation.

The edition, supported by Hertfordshire Press and the Eurasian Creative Guild (London), is distributed to universities, diplomatic missions, and cultural institutions worldwide. A digital version is available at ocamagazine.com.

Uzbek-Born Author Dina Rubina’s Tashkent Event Suspended Amid Outrage Over Gaza Comments

Ticket sales for an upcoming literary event in Tashkent by Israel-based writer Dina Rubina have been suspended following widespread controversy over her remarks about the Gaza conflict.

Rubina, born in Tashkent in 1953, was formerly a member of the Uzbekistan Writers’ Union. She moved to Moscow in 1984 and currently resides in Israel, continuing to write in Russian.

Rubina was scheduled to perform at Turkiston Palace in Tashkent on October 10, with tickets sold through box offices and online via iTicket.uz, according to Anons. However, online sales have since been discontinued, and promotional materials on Afisha.uz have been taken down.

The backlash emerged after excerpts from Rubina’s recent interview with Russian television channel Dozhd were widely circulated and criticized. In the interview, aired on July 20, Rubina discussed the Hamas attacks on Israel on October 7, 2023, and the ensuing violence.

Journalist Mikhail Kozyrev, who conducted the interview, later revealed on his Facebook page that some of Rubina’s more inflammatory statements had been edited out. According to Kozyrev, Rubina had said: “Israel has the right to defend itself. It has the right to dissolve them all in hydrochloric acid, clean Gaza and turn it into a parking lot. There is no civilian population there! One teacher kept an Israeli soldier’s head in a refrigerator, another stored body parts for sale, they are expensive, in a basement. Don’t talk to me about ‘peaceful civilians’.”

Kozyrev explained that the phrases were removed from the broadcast due to their extreme nature, but he later published the full transcript online. This prompted backlash, with some accusing the channel of censorship.

Russian musician Andrei Makarevich criticized Dozhd’s editorial choices, arguing that they “cut out the most important parts.” Kozyrev responded that the remarks were omitted because “such statements should not be made about anyone.”

As the controversy intensified, Rubina posted a statement on July 29 accusing Kozyrev of misrepresenting her words: “Apparently, the interview seemed too mild to the interviewer, so he hastily filled his Facebook page with dirty distortions of my various words and phrases. This is not just falsification; it’s deliberate manipulation of meaning.”

Kozyrev later issued an apology, acknowledging that publishing the unedited transcript was a mistake: “Generalizing about entire nations is destructive. There are no bad nations, only bad people. Even war cannot justify statements like ‘they all must be destroyed’.”

In response, Russian journalist Ilya Azar called for a more humane approach from supporters of Israel. “I saw photos of starving children in Gaza and then read Rubina’s comments,” he wrote on social media. “How can an educated adult, especially Jewish, aware of their history, say or even think this? Yes, the October 7 attack was horrific, but it has already been answered, terrifyingly. People must stop this genocide.”

Kazakh journalist and activist Aigerim Bukeyeva compared Rubina’s remarks to Russian war propaganda: “To the fans of Dina Rubina, who is apparently planning another tour in Kazakhstan, are you eager to see the ‘talented writer’ because of her work or because you share her cannibalistic views? We protest the performances of infamous Russian propagandists, Rubina is no better.”

Tajikistan Launches Export Support Program for Small Producers and Farmers

Tajikistan has launched a wide-reaching initiative aimed at strengthening the country’s export potential, with a particular focus on supporting small producers and farmers. According to Khurshed Zuhurzoda, First Deputy Director of the Export Agency, export support centers and export schools are being established across the regions to provide both infrastructure and education to help local products reach international markets.

Empowering Farmers and Small Businesses

The program, supported by the World Bank, targets small-scale farms of which there are over 200,000 nationwide, that often lack the logistical, financial, and regulatory resources necessary to export their goods.

“This project is especially important for small-scale producers who do not have sufficient resources and knowledge to organize the export of their products,” Zuhurzoda said.

Education, Consulting, and Promotion

The initiative is grounded in the newly approved Concept for the Development of Export Support Centers and Export Schools. These institutions will offer comprehensive support to prospective exporters, including:

  • Training in the fundamentals of international trade;
  • Consulting on certification, customs procedures, and legal compliance;
  • Assistance in identifying foreign partners and market entry strategies;
  • Participation in international exhibitions and forums;
  • Promotion of the Made in Tajikistan brand through digital and traditional media.

The program aims to enhance the global visibility of Tajik products and reinforce the presence of local producers in competitive international markets.

A grant from the World Bank is also funding the construction and outfitting of the first regional export centers, scheduled to open in the Gorno-Badakhshan Autonomous Region and Khatlon region by the end of 2025.

Rising Trade Validates Strategic Direction

Zuhurzoda noted that the program’s rollout coincides with an uptick in foreign trade. In the first half of 2025, Tajikistan’s foreign trade turnover reached $4.7 million, a 7.2% increase compared to the same period in 2024.

Officials view this as confirmation that their strategy of diversifying the economy, strengthening small and medium-sized enterprises, and boosting the international competitiveness of Tajik goods is gaining traction.

Amid intensifying global competition and regional shifts in trade logistics, this initiative may play a pivotal role in building a resilient and export-oriented economy in Tajikistan.

Kazakhstan and Turkey Tighten Ties Amid Shifting Caspian Dynamics

Kazakhstan’s President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev arrived in Turkey on an official visit late on Monday, where he held talks with President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan. The two leaders went on to co-chair the fifth meeting of the Kazakhstan–Turkey High-Level Strategic Cooperation Council. Coming amid heightened tensions in the Caspian region, particularly between Russia and Azerbaijan, the trip appears aimed at recalibrating regional dynamics, though analysts say its full implications remain unclear.

Tokayev’s visit ended on a ceremonial high, as Erdoğan bestowed upon him the Devlet Nişanı, Turkey’s highest state honor. Accepting the award, Tokayev — who noted he had previously declined both domestic and foreign distinctions — thanked the Turkish president and people, highlighting Kazakhstan’s political and economic achievements. Erdoğan, in turn, praised Kazakhstan as the “center of peace and stability in its region.” Yet with Kazakhstan straddling both Central Asia and the Caspian basin — each a strategic priority for Ankara — it remains unclear which “region” Erdoğan had in mind.

Much of the visit, however, played out behind closed doors. The official press release offered only general statements and few specifics. But the images released were polished and plentiful.

Ahead of the summit, Tokayev met with prominent Turkish business leaders already active in Kazakhstan or planning future investments in the country’s economy.

Political analyst Adil Kaukenov, a China specialist, weighed in on Tokayev’s business meetings via his Telegram channel, stating that the main topics were processing and logistics. His colleague Daniyar Ashimbayev, meanwhile, interpreted the visit as evidence that Astana is pursuing the foreign policy course it deems necessary.

“I have already written about the logistical and geopolitical rivalry between Central Asia, the South Caucasus, and Asia Minor,” Ashimbayev observed. “A strange situation even arose when Kazakhstan signed one agreement on the Trans-Afghan Highway with Kabul, and Tashkent signed another. Or the constant discussion between Tashkent and Baku on the development of the Trans-Caspian corridor without the participation of Ashgabat and Astana. Tensions have risen in relations between Baku and Moscow, which could jeopardize Caspian logistics. Against this backdrop, the Kazakh authorities are methodically pushing through their agenda.”

Ashimbayev also recalled Kazakhstan’s recent diplomatic successes, such as securing EU sanctions exemptions for agricultural and coal exports.

“In this regard, Tokayev’s trip to Ankara was intended to resolve possible contradictions and misunderstandings in bilateral relations,” Ashimbayev concluded.

While official sources emphasized economic and cultural-humanitarian cooperation as the main themes of the visit, Ashimbayev hinted that more sensitive topics may have been discussed privately.

“The Turkish release mentions that the parties discussed defense issues, while the Kazakh release says they talked about IT,” he noted. “But by and large, the meaning of the talks is that both leaders calmly sorted out mutual issues, with no one acting as a supplicant or ‘vassal’ (as is sometimes the case at similar meetings). Kazakhstan methodically focused on the issues of interest to it and correctly discussed the issues raised by the host of the summit.”

A closer analysis of publications on Akorda, the Kazakh presidential website, offers subtle clues about the meeting’s agenda. One statement from the Strategic Cooperation Council notes that the two sides discussed “prospects for increasing exports via the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan oil pipeline.” Tokayev also “invited Turkish companies to participate in projects aimed at reducing the electricity deficit,” and expressed confidence in the partnership between KazMunayGas and Turkiye Petroleum.

The BTC pipeline is often floated as an alternative to Russian export routes, though it tends to re-emerge during times of political tension as a form of leverage. Moscow remains unenthusiastic about Ankara’s growing role as a logistics hub in the region.

During a media briefing, Tokayev said: “Currently, 1.4 million tons of Kazakh oil are transported annually to Turkey via the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline. We discussed increasing supply volumes and welcome Turkiye Petroleum’s intention to work in the Kazakh market. We are also interested in utilizing the investment opportunities of Turkish companies and their experience in diversifying energy sources and building power plants. We are ready to jointly implement large-scale projects.”

But even more significant was Tokayev’s public and official invitation for Turkey to increase its presence in the Caspian region.

“The development of the Trans-Caspian international transport route, known as the Middle Corridor, is of great importance. This initiative is in the interests of both countries. Kazakhstan is modernizing its railways, building highways, and upgrading infrastructure to boost shipping on the Caspian Sea. We invite Turkish investors to actively participate in these projects. Our government is ready to provide special incentives to Turkish entrepreneurs,” Tokayev stated.

The Caspian Sea, once largely dominated by Russia, requires substantial investment to increase its logistical capacity. This includes not only the BTC pipeline, which relies on barge transport from Aktau, but other east-west cargo routes such as Chinese goods en route to Europe. The limited depth of the sea restricts large vessels, reducing the economic appeal of the Middle Corridor. Turkey, with an interest in both the BTC and the broader corridor, is a logical partner.

From a geopolitical perspective, Ankara, as a NATO member, could serve as a counterweight to Russia and Iran in the region.

Viewed through that lens, Tokayev’s outreach to Erdoğan looks like a calculated and strategic move, and Erdoğan appeared to be acknowledging this by presenting Kazakhstan’s president with Turkey’s highest award.

The question now is, how will Moscow respond?

EU–Kazakhstan Relations: Strategic Cooperation Amid Geopolitical Shifts

In a recent podcast discussion, EU Ambassador to Kazakhstan Aleška Simkić and Kazakhstan’s Ambassador to the EU and NATO, Roman Vassilenko, discussed the evolving relationship between the European Union and Kazakhstan and broader Central Asia. Their exchange offered insight into the shared strategic interests driving EU–Kazakhstan cooperation across trade, energy, critical raw materials, connectivity, and mobility.

Trade and Investment: A Stable Foundation
Trade and investment continue to underpin the relationship; the European Union remains Kazakhstan’s largest trading partner and top foreign investor. Bilateral trade reached $49.7 billion in 2024, with the majority comprising energy exports from Kazakhstan, highlighting its role as a key supplier to European markets. The EU collectively accounts for a significant share of Kazakhstan’s FDI, equal to €54.8 billion in 2022, representing approximately 50–55% of Kazakhstan’s total FDI.

The Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (EPCA), in effect since 2020, underpins the EU–Kazakhstan bilateral relationship, providing a legal framework for cooperation across 29 sectors. As noted by both ambassadors, it enables structured dialogue on trade, energy, governance, and sustainability. While political engagement has increased, both sides acknowledge that deeper implementation is needed to fully leverage the EPCA in line with the EU’s broader strategy for Central Asia.

Roman Vassilenko acknowledged the recent momentum: “I think the relationship between Kazakhstan and the EU has strengthened tremendously over the past three and a half years. With a relatively new Commission in place in Brussels, and with the President of Kazakhstan committed to strengthening ties with the European Union as part of our balanced and pragmatic foreign policy, we are at a moment where we can truly advance, deepen, and strengthen our relations in many ways.”

EU Ambassador to Kazakhstan, Aleška Simkić (left) with Kazakhstan’s Ambassador to the EU and NATO, Roman Vassilenko (right); Image: EU Delegation to Kazakhstan.

Energy and Raw Materials: Strategic Realignment
While energy has long anchored EU–Kazakhstan ties, both ambassadors emphasized a shift toward broader, forward-looking cooperation. Ambassador Vassilenko identified critical raw materials and green hydrogen as emerging areas of strategic importance, offering Kazakhstan opportunities to diversify its economy while supporting the EU’s green transition.

Kazakhstan, with its mineral wealth and renewable energy potential, is well-positioned to contribute to Europe’s supply chain resilience in clean technologies. The country’s abundant reserves of critical minerals—such as rare earths, copper, lithium, and cobalt—align with Europe’s need to diversify sources for its green transition. Coupled with growing investment in renewable energy and deepening cooperation with European partners, Kazakhstan stands out as a strategic supplier for clean-tech industries.

Both envoys stressed the importance of moving from basic resource exports toward long-term industrial partnerships — including local processing, infrastructure development, and regulatory alignment — as a means of ensuring mutual benefit.

Connectivity: The Middle Corridor and Infrastructure Links
Connectivity also features prominently. The Trans-Caspian International Transport Route, or “Middle Corridor,” is increasingly viewed as a viable overland route connecting China to Europe via Kazakhstan. Cargo volumes have risen, and both the EU and regional stakeholders are investing in capacity upgrades. The EU’s Global Gateway strategy includes a €12 billion commitment to infrastructure in Central Asia, covering transport, energy, and digital initiatives.

Connectivity was identified by both ambassadors as a strategic priority, with Vassilenko emphasizing the growing importance of the Middle Corridor and describing it as a key area for advancing regional integration and EU-Kazakhstan cooperation. Indeed, the EU–Kazakhstan collaboration now includes a dedicated Coordination Platform for the corridor’s development, aimed at strengthening transport links and infrastructure across the region.

As the ambassadors stressed, connectivity is not just logistical — it’s geopolitical. The Middle Corridor is becoming a central pillar of Kazakhstan’s role as a bridge between Asia and Europe.

Mobility: Negotiating Easier Access
Mobility remains a point of interest, particularly in light of Kazakhstan’s interest in visa facilitation with the EU. Negotiations are expected to begin in the fall of 2025 though outcomes will depend on alignment with EU visa policies and migration standards. Both ambassadors described greater people-to-people contact as a long-term investment in bilateral relations.

Strategic Context and Outlook
The EU’s broader engagement with Central Asia has gained urgency amid geopolitical tensions and supply chain disruptions. At the inaugural EU–Central Asia Summit in Samarkand in April 2025, leaders adopted the Samarkand Declaration, elevating relations to a strategic partnership and reaffirming respect for sovereignty and territorial integrity. The EU reaffirmed its “commitment to deeper cooperation in an evolving global and regional geopolitical landscape [and] upgrade relations between the European Union and Central Asia to a strategic partnership.”

As EU Ambassador Aleška Simkić noted in the recent dialogue: “We must continue to engage with geopolitics constructively. Both the EU and Kazakhstan share a commitment to the UN Charter and a peace-oriented agenda. I also see potential in regional integration. While the EU has its internal challenges, Central Asia is moving closer together. Kazakhstan plays a key role in that. Continued progress in regional cooperation offers significant opportunities.”

However, challenges remain. EU investment, while increasing, is still competing with a substantial Chinese and Russian economic presence. Additionally, practical barriers — ranging from infrastructure bottlenecks to regulatory fragmentation — could slow progress.

Nonetheless, there is cautious optimism. As the EU seeks to diversify its supply chains and develop more resilient partnerships, Kazakhstan has positioned itself as a relevant player. Whether that translates into durable, balanced cooperation will depend on sustained policy alignment, transparency, and mutual accountability.

Kazakhstan Faces Turbulence as External Pressures Mount

Kazakhstan, Central Asia’s largest economy, is facing a convergence of pressures, from currency depreciation and geopolitical turmoil to volatile oil markets and contentious fiscal reforms, that are testing its economic resilience.

Geopolitical Pressures Escalate

By mid-2025, it had become increasingly apparent that Kazakhstan has limited capacity to influence global geopolitical dynamics. Like many “middle powers,” the country must adapt to the actions of larger states, whose unpredictable decisions continue to exert downward pressure on the tenge and fuel inflation.

On July 28, U.S. President Donald Trump shortened a previously issued 50-day ultimatum to Russian President Vladimir Putin, giving him just 10-12 days to agree to a peace deal with Ukraine. This development added to the mounting uncertainty already impacting Kazakhstan’s economy.

As previously reported by The Times of Central Asia, analysts warn that Trump’s secondary sanctions, 100% tariffs targeting Russia’s trading partners, could potentially be extended to Kazakhstan and other Central Asian economies. Though Kazakhstan is not among Russia’s largest trading partners, its economic links to Moscow are still substantial. The country relies heavily on imports from Russia, including electricity, gasoline, food, and medicine.

Adding to the pressure, on July 7, Trump announced a 25% tariff on Kazakhstani goods, effective August 1, 2025. While $1.8 billion of Kazakhstan’s $2 billion in exports to the U.S. (mostly oil, metals, and rare earth elements) are exempt, the move has nonetheless rattled Kazakhstan’s already fragile industrial sector and spooked investors.

Oil price instability, largely driven by Western efforts to curtail Russian exports, also poses a major risk. Oil revenues make up the bulk of Kazakhstan’s export income and are a key source of budget financing.

Further complicating matters, new Russian restrictions require foreign tankers to obtain Federal Security Service (FSB) approval before accessing key Black Sea ports. This affects the Caspian Pipeline Consortium (CPC), which handles more than 80% of Kazakhstan’s oil exports and is partly owned by U.S. firms Chevron and ExxonMobil. Reuters estimates the new rules could disrupt over 2% of global oil supply.

Tenge Hits Historic Low

As of July 28, the tenge dropped to a record low of 544.87 per U.S. dollar. The depreciation is driving up the cost of imports, an acute problem in an import-dependent economy, pushing more families to spend over half their income on food.

Companies with debt obligations in U.S. dollars are also seeing their liabilities grow, worsening the investment climate and prompting firms to scale back on planned expansions.

Central Bank Warns Against Intervention

National Bank Chairman Timur Suleimenov cautioned against government intervention in currency markets, stating that past administrative controls led to abrupt and damaging devaluations.

Suleimenov blamed rising fiscal injections and an 18% increase in money supply for the tenge’s vulnerability. He warned that unless GDP and industrial output keep pace with monetary growth, currency pressure will persist. Although Kazakhstan has $52.2 billion in reserves to mitigate speculative shocks, the governor insisted that intervention should be reserved for market distortions, not fundamental shifts.

Structural Trade Imbalances Deepen

Economist Yernar Serik noted via his Telegram channel, Tradereport, that growing imports of foreign equipment, driven by industrial modernization, are compounding exchange rate pressures. In June 2025 alone, domestic firms spent 652 billion KZT ($1.2 billion) on machinery, a 47% increase from May and 35% higher year-on-year.

Serik also highlighted a deteriorating trade surplus: from $9.5 billion in January-May 2024 to just $6 billion in the same period of 2025. While exports fell 9% to $29.8 billion, imports rose to $23.7 billion. “This trade pattern means Kazakhstan now earns less foreign currency while spending more of it,” Serik said. “The weakening of the tenge isn’t a conspiracy; it reflects the laws of supply and demand.”

Fiscal Reforms Spark Backlash

In a bid to stabilize the economy, President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev signed a new Tax Code on July 18, introducing a 16% standard VAT rate and setting reduced rates for medicine and healthcare services from 2026.

The reforms have triggered strong resistance from the business community. Industry associations and entrepreneurs argue that the changes will stifle business activity, increase administrative burdens, and raise the risk of corruption.

“Due to the increased tax burden, businesses will raise prices, rents will climb, and consumer demand will fall,” warned Berik Zairov, chair of the Union of Independent Businesses of Kazakhstan. Experts also forecast a further drop in small business numbers and a negative impact on wages and investment.

Economic Crossroads: Kazakhstan Faces Prolonged Volatility

As Kazakhstan navigates this storm of external shocks and domestic challenges, the coming months will test the government’s ability to balance fiscal discipline with economic support. While officials are betting on cautious monetary policy, structural reforms, and resilient oil exports to prevent a deeper crisis, the country’s dependence on external markets leaves it exposed to forces beyond its control. Without a decisive shift in trade dynamics or geopolitical relief, Central Asia’s largest economy may face a prolonged period of volatility that reshapes its growth trajectory.