• KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00196 -0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10904 0%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28490 0%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00196 -0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10904 0%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28490 0%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00196 -0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10904 0%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28490 0%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00196 -0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10904 0%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28490 0%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00196 -0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10904 0%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28490 0%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00196 -0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10904 0%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28490 0%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00196 -0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10904 0%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28490 0%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00196 -0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10904 0%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28490 0%
08 December 2025

Future Chelsea Player Satpaev Seals Second Consecutive Title for Kairat

Almaty’s Kairat Football Club has secured its second consecutive Kazakhstan Premier League (KPL) championship. The decisive goal in the final match was scored by Kazakhstan national team striker Dastan Satpaev, currently on contract with London’s Chelsea.

Last year, Kairat won the national championship for the fourth time in its history. This summer, the club qualified for the UEFA Champions’ League group stage for the first time, intensifying pressure on the team as it competed simultaneously in both domestic and European tournaments. Entering the final round, Kairat held a narrow two-point lead over its closest challenger, FC Astana. Fittingly, the season concluded with a high-stakes home match against the capital’s team.

The match took place on Sunday, October 26. Despite Kairat’s territorial dominance, Astana struck first, 38-year-old midfielder Marin Tomasov scored in the 15th minute with a well-placed shot from the penalty area. The visitors threatened further, but Kairat goalkeeper Temirlan Anarbekov delivered several crucial saves to keep the deficit at one.

In the second half, Satpaev, who will join Chelsea after he turns 18, scored the equalizer, making it 1-1. The draw was enough to keep Kairat ahead in the standings, two points clear of Astana, and clinch the club’s fifth national title. Tomasov nearly scored a second goal during stoppage time, but his shot struck the crossbar.

With this result, Kairat became only the seventh club in KPL history to successfully defend its title. The league’s record for consecutive championships belongs to Astana, who won six straight from 2014 to 2019. Aktobe followed with a three-peat (2007–2009), while Yelimay (1994-1995), Zhenis (2000-2001), Irtysh (2002-2003), and Shakhtar Karagandy (2011-2012) each managed two. Between 2020 and 2024, no team had retained the championship, until now.

“There were certainly difficulties during the season, primarily the struggle on several fronts,” said Kairat head coach Rafael Urazbakhtin after the match.

He noted that frequent squad rotation, a demanding schedule, and long-distance travel forced the coaching staff to carefully manage the squad’s physical condition.

“Over time, the team adapted to the rhythm of two or three matches a week. Endurance and teamwork became key factors,” he added.

Kairat’s attention now shifts back to the Champions League, where the club sits in last place in its group with one point from three matches. The next fixture is on November 5 in Milan against second-placed Inter.

As previously reported by The Times of Central Asia, Kairat’s Champions League breakthrough was made possible in part by Anarbekov’s standout performance in a penalty shootout victory over Scotland’s Celtic.

“Music Is Born in Pain”: Kazakh Composer Robert Ziganshin on Inspiration, Integrity, and Creative Freedom

Robert Ziganshin is one of Kazakhstan’s most in-demand film composers. A graduate of the Lyon Conservatory in France, where he studied classical guitar and earned master’s degrees in both music for the visual arts and musicology, he returned home to rapidly establish himself in the country’s film and television industry.

Ziganshin’s credits include music for popular TV series and films such as Alisher Utev’s crime drama 5:32 (IMDB), the box office hit Kazakh Business in Brazil, and Malika, a feature film by Russian director Natalya Uvarova about a family of Ingush migrants.

In an interview with The Times of Central Asia, Ziganshin spoke about the influence of the French school, the ethics of film composition, and why writing music “that simply comments on the action” can mean sacrificing artistic integrity.

TCA: Robert, you graduated from KIMEP in Kazakhstan. How did you end up in France?

Ziganshin: I’ve been passionate about music since early childhood. Even when I was playing with building blocks, I was always humming something, as if adding a soundtrack to my own stories. I didn’t get into music school, and it wasn’t until I was fifteen that I started taking private guitar lessons. There were times I practiced six hours a day.

There was no higher education in classical guitar in Kazakhstan at the time, so I enrolled at KIMEP. After graduating, I applied to two conservatories in France and was accepted to the one in Lyon.

TCA: Why France?

Ziganshin: I spoke fluent French. My father had sent me to language school, and I took part in competitions. Later, a professor from Lyon gave a master class in Almaty, and I helped translate for him. He assessed my level and encouraged me to apply to his course.

TCA: Was tuition really that affordable?

Ziganshin: For foreign students, it was about €900 per year, including health insurance. Compared to the UK, it was a bargain. I spent four years there and earned a bachelor’s degree.

TCA: How did you shift into composing for film?

Ziganshin: I met students from the program Musique appliquée aux arts visuels, music created for film, theater, performance, and media art. I wanted to try it. The entrance exam was creative: we had to score scenes and compose music for a three-minute video in a week. I got in on my second try, only twelve of us were accepted.

It was a two-year program, starting with orchestration and sound engineering, then moving into practical work on student film projects.

TCA: What was the subject of your master’s thesis?

Ziganshin: When should a composer start work on a film? Personally, I prefer being involved from the script stage. After finishing that degree, I also enrolled in a master’s in musicology.

In 2021, I returned to Kazakhstan. I struggled to find paid work in music and almost joined my father’s printing business. I even started hand-making notebooks, neat and beautiful ones. But soon, small offers started coming in, and I returned to composing full-time, initially working on short films for free. Gradually, I gained access to the industry.

TCA: Your collaboration with Alisher Utev began with 5:32. What was your first impression?

Ziganshin: He arrived late to the script reading and didn’t pay much attention to the team. When they called my name, he didn’t seem to hear it. I thought I’d leave after the session. But during a break, he unexpectedly asked to talk, questioned me about music, and actually listened to my views. We clicked immediately and I stayed.

The fact that he invited a composer to the script reading already showed respect for my work. That’s rare. The more deeply I understand a project, the more precise the musical choices can be.

We still collaborate. I recently finished scoring his new series 1286, a crime drama that took about six months to complete.

TCA: You’ve been critical of the practice of using music to cue audience reactions.

Ziganshin: I call it “Mickey Mouse-ing.” The music becomes a caricature, where every gesture gets a musical comment. It reduces artistic value and turns the film into a puppet show, manipulating emotions.

Music should be a language of its own, not just an illustration. In Kazakh Business in Brazil, I used percussion instead of obvious musical cues to enhance the protagonist’s emotional highs. I even collaborated with a Brazilian artist who recorded Portuguese-language rap, though it wasn’t included in the final cut.

TCA: Tell us about scoring Malika.

Ziganshin: It was a rare case where the filmmakers welcomed experimentation. The music is almost invisible but sets the tone. At first, I questioned whether it was needed at all. Eventually, we chose two instruments, accordion and xylophone, as contrasting layers.

The accordion is significant in Ingush culture, but I didn’t want to use traditional folk motifs. Instead, I sampled and distorted chords to create a sound that blended tradition and modernity. The xylophone represented the heroine’s childhood and innocence. The music appears only in fragments, except during the credits.

TCA: Would you call yourself more disciplined or more inspired?

Ziganshin: I work every day, but the process isn’t easy. I’m always trying to find solutions that surprise and resonate. At first, everything often sounds wrong. I need time to “sleep on” the music and return with fresh ears.

I usually work four to five hours a day, nearly without breaks. I aim for high-quality production. Sometimes I feel embarrassed to release my music on streaming platforms because mixing is so expensive. For instance, 1286 has about thirty tracks, and mixing one track costs around $200.

I hope Kazakhstan will invest more in film music. That would strengthen the whole industry.

Uzbekistan and EU Sign Landmark Enhanced Partnership Agreement in Brussels

President Shavkat Mirziyoyev of Uzbekistan paid an official visit to Brussels on October 23-24 at the invitation of European Council President Antonio Costa and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, where a landmark agreement was signed to deepen Uzbekistan-EU cooperation across multiple sectors.

During the visit, Mirziyoyev attended the signing ceremony of the Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (EPCA), which replaces the 1996 Partnership and Cooperation Agreement. The new accord significantly broadens the scope of bilateral ties, covering areas such as trade, investment, digital technologies, environmental protection, and climate resilience. Negotiations began in February 2019 and concluded in July 2022.

The EPCA includes nine sections, 356 articles, and 14 annexes, forming a comprehensive legal framework for political dialogue and long-term economic collaboration. It aims to bolster cooperation in trade, innovation, sustainable development, education, and cultural exchange between Uzbekistan and EU member states.

In Brussels, Mirziyoyev also participated in a roundtable with executives from leading European companies and financial institutions, including Vandewiele, Linde, Lasselsberger Group, Meridiam, SUEZ, the European Investment Bank, Commerzbank, and KfW. The parties agreed to pursue new joint projects worth over €10 billion in sectors such as energy, chemicals, critical minerals, logistics, textiles, and pharmaceuticals. These initiatives build on an existing portfolio of EU-led projects in Uzbekistan, currently valued at more than €40 billion.

Over the past seven years, trade between Uzbekistan and the European Union has doubled, while the number of joint ventures with European investment has surpassed one thousand. Mirziyoyev highlighted that the partnership is grounded in mutual trust and shared priorities, particularly in human capital development, renewable energy, digital transformation, and sustainable infrastructure.

The President outlined four priority areas for expanding cooperation: joint production of high-value goods through deeper processing of strategic raw materials; collaboration in the green economy; development of logistics and transport corridors linking Europe and Asia; and partnerships in digital technologies, including artificial intelligence and cybersecurity.

On the sidelines of the visit, Mirziyoyev met with King Philippe of Belgium at Laeken Palace. The two leaders discussed trade, investment, and cultural ties, with the King congratulating Uzbekistan on the signing of the historic EPCA.

Relations between Uzbekistan and Belgium continue to grow, with rising trade volumes and expanding business cooperation. Belgian firms are active in Uzbekistan’s textile, logistics, and service sectors, while cultural ties have also deepened. Notable milestones include the unveiling of a bust of Ibn Sina in Kortrijk and sister-city partnerships such as Tashkent-Kortrijk and Samarkand-Liège.

Mirziyoyev extended an official invitation to King Philippe to visit Uzbekistan, underscoring a shared commitment to strengthening bilateral ties in the years ahead.

Kazakhstan Responds to Claims It Has Abandoned Ethnic Kazakhs in Afghanistan

Recent claims circulating on social media have accused the Kazakh government of abandoning ethnic Kazakhs in Afghanistan, with posts often alleging that thousands of Kazakhs have been left to fend for themselves, painting an emotionally charged but factually questionable picture. The Times of Central Asia set out to verify these claims and found a far more complex reality.

Historical Background

Kazakh migration to Afghanistan dates back over a century. In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, some groups of Kazakhs arrived via Xinjiang, China. Later waves followed during the 1930s, prompted by famine and Stalinist repression in the USSR. Some speculate that early migrants may have included supporters of Kenesary Khan, but this remains the subject of academic debate.

While there are no official Afghan census records, estimates suggest that by the mid-20th century, the number of Kazakhs in Afghanistan may have reached 20,000-24,000. However, the repatriation programs of the 1990s drastically reduced these numbers.

Since Kazakhstan’s independence, approximately 13,000 Kazakhs have returned from Afghanistan, part of a broader national effort that has repatriated over 1.15 million ethnic Kazakhs from abroad.

Even after the Taliban takeover, repatriation efforts continued. In September 2021, for example, 35 ethnic Kazakhs were airlifted to Kazakhstan on a specially arranged flight.

Disputed Numbers

According to Kazakhstan’s Foreign Ministry and as confirmed by its embassy in Kabul, the number of ethnic Kazakhs remaining in Afghanistan is about 200 people, or roughly 15 families.

In contrast, some self-proclaimed “cultural centers” and online activists claim there are “thousands” of families, with some estimates as high as 3,600 people. These figures are not substantiated by either official data or independent research.

Verifying Ethnic Identity

The Kazakh embassy in Kabul maintains contact with community representatives to track and verify the status of ethnic Kazakhs. Yet, confirming identities is a serious challenge in Afghanistan due to the absence of a comprehensive population registry.

Since 2018, Afghan identity cards (e-Tazkira) have included a “nationality” field, but filling it is optional and based primarily on self-declaration or statements by local elders. This system is vulnerable to manipulation. The embassy reports cases where individuals from other ethnic backgrounds have falsely identified as Kazakh in the hope of qualifying for repatriation programs.

Additional complications include limited access to remote provinces, weak administrative oversight, and security concerns. The embassy thus relies on field visits, trusted local contacts, and cautious verification to produce its population estimates.

Mixed Marriages and Assimilation

One of the biggest challenges in identification is interethnic marriage. Over the decades, many Kazakhs in Afghanistan have assimilated into surrounding Uzbek, Turkmen, or Tajik communities. Many no longer speak Kazakh, and identity is maintained through fragmentary knowledge of family genealogies (shezhire), often insufficient for verification.

The embassy also raised concerns about “disputed applicants”, individuals attempting to exploit Kazakhstan’s earlier, more lenient kandastar (ethnic repatriation) policy. In the absence of rigorous documentation, ethnicity in Afghanistan has often been based on verbal claims, creating openings for abuse and corruption.

Why Not Use DNA?

Some social media users have suggested resolving the issue through DNA testing. However, this method is neither ethical nor practical for determining ethnicity.

The UNHCR uses DNA only as a last resort for confirming biological family relationships, not for verifying nationality. The European Union and the International Organization for Migration (IOM) follow similar standards, emphasizing interviews, documents, language skills, and cultural knowledge over genetic tests. Attempts to use genetics for nationality screening, such as in the UK in 2009, were widely condemned and quickly abandoned.

Kazakhstan’s verification process, in line with international norms, includes interviews based on shezhire, language assessments, biometric data, and cross-checks with relatives in Kazakhstan or neighboring countries such as Pakistan and Iran.

Those Who Remain

The claim that Kazakhstan has “abandoned thousands of Kazakhs” in Afghanistan is not supported by verifiable evidence. Approximately 200 people remain, and many of the broader community have already repatriated. While conditions in Afghanistan are difficult, the Kazakh government continues to engage with the remaining families through diplomatic channels.

While the humanitarian concerns are real, emotionally driven narratives circulating online oversimplify a complex issue. The Kazakh community in Afghanistan today represents a small, residual group, not a full-fledged diaspora. Their welfare matters, but policy must remain grounded in realism and security imperatives, not speculation.

Kazakhstan Highlights Its Literary Heritage at the 2025 Frankfurt Book Fair

From October 15 to 19, Kazakhstan took part in the 2025 Frankfurter Buchmesse in Germany – one of the world’s most prominent and influential international book fairs. At its national stand, the country presented a diverse selection of new publications from leading Kazakh publishers to a global readership. 

Celebrating its 77th edition, this year’s Frankfurt Book Fair featured more than 30 delegates from Kazakhstan, from major publishing houses such as Mektep, Almatykitap, Atamura, ARMAN-PV, Steppe & World Publishing, Evero, Kazformoms, and AmalBooks.

@TCA

The national pavilion became an important hub for expanding international publishing partnerships. Approximately 350 Kazakh titles were showcased, spanning a wide range of genres from literary fiction and scholarly works to educational and children’s books.

 Book Presentations and Highlights

Several notable book launches took place during the fair. Of particular interest was the multilingual edition Abai’s “Words of Wisdom: Legacy for Generations”, translated into seven languages and presented with the participation of German writer Anja Tuckermann. Another major highlight was a creative presentation of Mirzhakyp Dulatov’s timeless novel “Unfortunate Jamal”, regarded as one of the classics of Kazakh literature.

@TCA

The Consul General of Kazakhstan in Frankfurt am Main, Tauboldy Umbetbayev, visited the national pavilion to show support for the Kazakh delegation and to emphasize literature’s vital role in promoting cultural diplomacy.

Throughout the fair, publishers from Canada, China, Turkey, Azerbaijan, Denmark, Germany, Singapore, and several other countries met with Kazakh representatives to discuss potential collaborations.

U.S. Backs Private Bid for Kazakhstan’s Tungsten

The United States is facilitating a private American bid by Cove Kaz Capital Group LLC for Kazakhstan’s Upper Kairakty and North Katpar tungsten deposits, in competition with state-backed Chinese bidders. Tungsten is not a rare earth element, but it is a critical raw material. In particular, it underpins armor-piercing ammunition, penetrators, and high-temperature tooling used across aerospace and industrial manufacturing. Reporting indicates direct engagement by senior U.S. officials and active coordination with Kazakhstan’s sovereign-wealth ecosystem.

The metal’s significance elevates the commercial negotiation into a strategic policy. The policy driver is diversification away from China’s dominance along the mine-to-powder supply chains. China accounts for well over four-fifths of global tungsten production and processing, and tightened export controls in 2025 have upset pricing and availability. The U.S. has established a procurement deadline of 2027 to avoid sourcing from China or Russia for covered defense uses. All this adds urgency to securing non-Chinese volumes. Kazakhstan’s revived tungsten sector includes a newly opened processing plant, with destinations not yet announced for the concentrate to be produced. The country thus offers a practical non-Chinese source of tungsten.

Strategic Stakes and Principal Actors

The American role would be one of facilitation and financing, rather than ownership. The administration has supported talks linking Cove Kaz to Kazakhstan’s Samruk-Kazyna and relevant mining entities. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is mentioned as a key interlocutor. Potential financial tools include the U.S. International Development Finance Corporation (DFC) and the Export-Import Bank. Insurance (EXIM), guarantees, or direct loans from these institutions would offset pricing and risk advantages historically offered by Chinese bidders. The U.S. government’s approach is to enable a private operator to compete without placing federal equity as an asset.

Kazakhstan’s Samruk-Kazyna and its mining arm Tau-Ken Samruk coordinate with the national exploration company Qazgeology. Kazakhstan has pursued a wider critical-minerals investment agenda, signaling its openness to joint ventures and privatization pathways under a special legal regime that provides a familiar legal and compliance framework for Western partners. That structure streamlines licensing and dispute resolution and has already been used for joint ventures in other critical minerals projects.

China remains the current market leader, dominating tungsten mining, ammonium paratungstate (APT) conversion, and downstream powders and carbides. Beijing’s 2025 export controls cover tungsten, tightening an already narrow global market and raising the policy value of non-Chinese options. Reports of Chinese interest in Vietnam’s Nui Phao tungsten complex underscore that non-Chinese sources face active competition, framing Kazakhstan’s appeal to Western buyers.

The Assets and Kazakhstan’s Capacity Rebuild

Kazakhstan suspended tungsten production after the 1990s but has moved over the past several years to re-establish a mine-to-processing base, with corporate and ministerial communications emphasizing the strategic nature of these deposits for long-term development. Upper Kairakty (also rendered as Verkhneye or Upper Kayrakty) and North Katpar sit in the Karaganda Region and feature repeatedly in Samruk-linked materials as the top tungsten prospects. Upper Kairakty is by itself the world’s largest tungsten deposit, and represents over two-thirds of the total tungsten reserves across the ex-Soviet territories.

One report places combined reserves above 40,000 tons of tungsten at North Katpar and Upper Kairakty together, while other public commentary sometimes cites a multi-million-ton national endowment across numerous deposits. Estimates can vary depending on whether sources report ore tonnage or contained tungsten, which among different legitimate reporting standards they use, and what cut-off grade they assume.

Kazakhstan’s rebuilding of capacity on the processing side has been significant. In November 2024, the first tungsten processing plant in the Almaty Region was launched, implemented with Chinese partners. Government, trade-press, and regional outlets consistently describe design throughput of about 3.3 million tons of ore per year, producing a 65% concentrate at steady state. That facility creates domestic value-add and export options that were not present during the long post-Soviet hiatus.

Beyond tungsten, other projects are advancing. Signaling extends beyond tungsten. The Luxembourg-based Eurasian Resources Group, 40% owned by the Kazakhstan government with the remainder split evenly among the families of the three Kazakhstani founder-shareholders, plans to begin gallium production in 2026. This would add a non-Chinese source for a semiconductor input that has largely come from China. In practice, additional mineral projects make it easier to fund and run the transport links and services a tungsten mine needs.

Deal Mechanics, the 2027 Clock, and Financing Paths

The 2027 U.S. defense-sourcing deadline creates a practical cut-off for primes and suppliers. Every tungsten-bearing component will face tighter origin checks. As the date approaches, compliant, auditable supply gains value, and contracts tied to Chinese or Russian feedstock become less acceptable. Early, verifiable offtake from Kazakhstan would therefore carry both policy and price advantages in U.S. defense procurement.

Financing is the step that makes production and delivery possible. DFC and EXIM can supply political-risk insurance, direct loans, loan guarantees, and buyer credits that reduce the cost of capital and counter concessional terms from Chinese institutions. A structured package aligned with environmental and social safeguards can support mine development, processing, and dedicated transport, without U.S. public ownership. Properly arranged, such a stack can also accelerate project timelines to intersect with the 2027 window.

The near-term watchlist for project implementation includes definitive agreements with Samruk-Kazyna and Tau-Ken Samruk, pre-feasibility updates, and any non-binding documents outlining the key financial terms (hence technically called “term sheets”) and conditions of a potential loan or other financing arrangement. Term sheets typically set the groundwork for future, legally binding contracts, and indicate that a project has passed initial reviews and is moving toward final approval.

Precedent exists for how U.S. private capital can work with Kazakhstan’s state entities under the legal framework of the Astana International Financial Centre (AIFC), a special legal regime based on the law of England and Wales, including joint ventures in adjacent critical minerals domains. AIFC law includes regulations on company incorporation, corporate governance, intellectual property, and financial services that can shorten the learning curve for a tungsten joint venture and clarify dispute-resolution pathways. In a competitive tender against Chinese state-backed bidders, procedural speed and regulatory clarity can matter as much as headline price.

A Tungsten Pathway

If completed, a Cove Kaz-led development of Upper Kairakty and North Katpar would constitute a credible, scalable non-Chinese tungsten pathway in Central Eurasia. It would align U.S. diversification policy with Kazakhstan’s industrial strategy, connect to an emerging domestic processing base, and begin to shift allied tungsten procurement away from a single dominant source. The policy timing is tight but actionable if financing and governance align.

Risks are real and should be explicit. Resource and grade dispersion require additional work; capital intensity and operating inputs must be benchmarked against international peers; permitting and environmental review must be thorough; and Chinese commercial and diplomatic pushback should be assumed. Even so, the combination of processing capacity, policy alignment, and institutional financing tools gives this bid a foundation that earlier efforts lacked. The next twelve months will show whether this opportunity becomes signed agreements and pilot shipments in time to meet the 2027 constraint.

The lens of “strategic transactionalism” reveals that a Kazakhstan tungsten deal is not about new blocs or security guarantees. Rather, it is a practical bargain between sovereign actors to trade value for market access, finance, and predictability, without asking anyone to subordinate their identity or policies. This approach matches Washington’s current habit of favoring specified, commercial deliverables over open-ended commitments, and it suits Astana’s preference to diversify partners while keeping decisions at home. The U.S. role is that of a facilitator and buyer, not a garrison power.