Uzbekistan has lodged a diplomatic protest with Iran over social media posts describing Samarkand’s architecture as part of Persian civilization. The posts targeted United States Secretary of State Marco Rubio.
On October 23, Uzbekistan’s First Deputy Foreign Minister Bakhromjon Aloyev met with Iranian Ambassador Mohammad Ali Eskandari, who was handed a diplomatic note of protest. Uzbekistan’s Foreign Ministry described posts published by Iranian diplomatic missions on X as a one-sided and politicized interpretation of Samarkand’s history. Tashkent demanded that the posts be removed and that similar incidents be avoided in the future.
The dispute followed Rubio’s visit to Samarkand on October 19, when he recorded a video in Registan Square highlighting the city’s historical role in international trade.
Iran’s embassy in Armenia described the site where Rubio stood as part of Persian civilization. The embassy in Zimbabwe called Registan’s arches a “hallmark of Iranian-Islamic civilization,” accusing Rubio of seeking to destroy that heritage. Iran’s embassy in Bulgaria also criticized Rubio for disparaging Persian civilization while standing in front of monuments bearing its influence.
Earlier, during an October 7 speech in Athens, Rubio recalled the destruction of the Acropolis by the forces of Persian King Xerxes in 480 BCE. He also attacked Iran’s current clerical rulers, accusing them of promoting a “cult of death.”
Uzbekistan’s Foreign Ministry said that the heritage of Samarkand, Bukhara, Khiva, and other historic cities reflects centuries of statehood and cultural development among the Uzbek people. Tashkent objected to the use of the country’s history in political disputes between other states.
Samarkand has deep ties to the Persian-speaking world. Before the Arab conquest, it was one of the centers of Sogdiana, whose inhabitants spoke a language belonging to the Iranian language family. Persian later became widely used in Central Asian cities, including in literature and scholarship.
In the late 14th and early 15th centuries, Samarkand was the capital of Timur’s empire. Craftsmen from various regions, including Iran and the historic region of Khorasan, participated in the construction of its monumental buildings. The Registan architectural ensemble was built between the 15th and 17th centuries, combining local artistic traditions with those of the wider Islamic world.
The concept of Persian civilization encompasses a cultural area much larger than modern Iran. UNESCO describes Samarkand as a crossroads of cultures, reflecting influences from successive civilizations. The Iranian embassies did not make territorial claims against Uzbekistan; their posts concerned cultural and architectural history.
Samarkand’s heritage has also been a subject of debate within Central Asia. During the Soviet redrawing of Central Asia’s internal borders in 1924, Samarkand and Bukhara became part of the Uzbek Soviet Socialist Republic. Both cities historically had substantial Persian-speaking populations, and Tajik continues to be spoken there today. Historians have also documented Soviet-era pressure on Tajik residents to register as Uzbeks, contributing to longstanding disputes over the cities’ ethnic composition.
The dispute occurred amid increased U.S. diplomatic engagement in Central Asia. During his visit, Rubio attended a C5+1 meeting with the foreign ministers of the five Central Asian countries. The talks focused on expanding economic cooperation, including investment and critical minerals.
Uzbekistan is developing economic relations with Washington while maintaining an interest in cooperation with Tehran. Transportation routes through Iran provide access to Persian Gulf ports, an important consideration for landlocked Central Asian countries. In its statement on the protest, Uzbekistan’s Foreign Ministry also stressed the importance of bilateral relations with Iran.
