• KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00196 -0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10904 0%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28490 0%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00196 -0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10904 0%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28490 0%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00196 -0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10904 0%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28490 0%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00196 -0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10904 0%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28490 0%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00196 -0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10904 0%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28490 0%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00196 -0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10904 0%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28490 0%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00196 -0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10904 0%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28490 0%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00196 -0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10904 0%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28490 0%
08 December 2025

Kyrgyz President Visits Tajikistan, Opening New Era of Friendship

Kyrgyzstan’s President Sadyr Japarov just concluded a two-day visit to Tajikistan.

Rarely has the visit of one Central Asian leader to another Central Asian country been as welcome as Japarov’s trip to Tajikistan was. The two countries engaged in brief, but intense and devastating conflicts in late April 2021 and mid-September 2022, the only clashes between the militaries of the two Central Asian countries since the five Central Asian states became independent in late 1991.

Judging by Japarov’s warm reception in the Tajik capital Dushanbe, the worst of times have passed in Kyrgyz-Tajik relations.

A Year of Firsts

Japarov, who has been in power in Kyrgyzstan since late 2020, was making his first state visit to Tajikistan on July 8-9. Japarov traveled to Tajikistan in June 2021, nearly two months after the first outbreak of hostilities along the Kyrgyz-Tajik border, to speak with Tajik President Emomali Rahmon about easing tensions along their common frontier.

That June, a meeting was hastily arranged as an exercise in damage control, not a state visit, and in any case, the talks between the two presidents failed to head off even worse fighting in September of the next year.

This first state visit by Japarov followed President Rahmon’s visit to the Kyrgyz capital in March 2025, the first state visit by Rahmon to Kyrgyzstan in nearly 12 years. During Rahmon’s meeting in March, Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan signed the agreement delimiting the final disputed sections of their border, which both sides hope will end more than a decade of violence and destruction in the border area.

That agreement led to the first-ever summit of the presidents of the three Central Asian countries that share the Ferghana Valley. Uzbek President Shavkat Mirziyoyev joined Japarov and Rahmon on March 31 in the northern Tajik city of Khujand to celebrate the agreement on all three countries’ borders and talk about future cooperation.

Pomp and Ceremony

Rahmon was at the Dushanbe airport to meet Japarov when the latter arrived on July 8. Tajikistan’s Honor Guard played the national anthems of both countries, followed by a 21-gun salute for Japarov, before the two presidents made their way to the Tajik capital to hold talks.

The two leaders also visited a Kyrgyz-Tajik trade exhibit and attended a concert featuring performers from both countries dedicated to “Eternal Friendship.”

Moving Forward

Ahead of the Japarov-Rahmon meeting, The Times of Central Asia reported that trade between the two nations is starting to increase again. The figure for January-May trade between the two countries this year was a modest $6.35 million, but that is 15 times more than the meager $405,100 of bilateral trade during the first five months of 2024.

Less than a decade ago, there were years when Kyrgyz-Tajik bilateral trade topped $50 million.

Following the border agreement in March, two border crossings were reopened along the western sections of the Kyrgyz-Tajik frontier. During the meeting between the two presidents, it was announced that a third crossing had opened, the Tajvaron-Karamyk post connecting Kyrgyzstan’s Chong-Alai and Tajikistan’s Lakhsh (formerly Jirgatal) districts. This area is far from where the fighting in 2021 and 2022 took place, but residents of this region were affected when the border between the two countries was closed.

The Tajvaron-Karamyk crossing is important for the people living in this sparsely inhabited, remote region, as connections to the rest of their countries are tenuous through the mountain roads. The ability of communities to trade in the limited goods of the area helps provide basic sustenance when snow, rain, or rockslides impede deliveries from reaching one or both sides of the border.

Kyrgyz and Tajik representatives signed 14 agreements during Japarov’s visit. Most were cooperation agreements in areas such as agricultural research, television and radio broadcasting, and tourism, or agreements on cooperation between local administrations, and the two countries’ health and labor ministries.

Rahmon and Japarov also discussed the creation of free economic zones along the border, which could greatly benefit communities on both sides financially and encourage positive interactions between Kyrgyz and Tajik villagers.

But perhaps the most important topic in their talks was about mining.

Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan are the two poorest countries in Central Asia, but that could soon change. Both countries have sizeable deposits of critical minerals in their mountains, and both foreign governments and companies are already looking into potential deals.

Japarov suggested coordination and possibly joint work between Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan in developing some of these sites, as well as in ensuring mining operations did not cause environmental damage.

Japarov also met with other Tajik officials, including Rustam Emomali, the chairman of Tajikistan’s upper house of parliament. Rustam Emomali is the son of the Tajik president and seems to be the heir apparent when his father leaves office, so Japarov had an opportunity to take stock of Tajikistan’s presumptive future leader.

From Bombs and Bullets to Fruit and Fashion

Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan are alike in many ways. They are the two smallest countries in Central Asia in terms of territory, and both countries are more than 90% covered by mountains. Tajikistan’s population is more than 10 million, whilst Kyrgyzstan’s is more than seven million.

During Tajikistan’s 1992-1997 civil war, more than 40,000 Tajik citizens found refuge in Kyrgyzstan, though admittedly, the majority were ethnic Kyrgyz.

Disputed areas of their border poisoned what should have been a natural friendship.

Photos of Rahmon and Japarov touring the trade fair, admiring produce – including the melon pyramids that are mandatory when the Tajik leader meets with important foreign leaders – and textiles are a sign the relationship is headed in a better direction.

Since the first conflict in 2021, the two countries have spent their scarce resources on arms and military equipment, funds which would have been better utilized on social infrastructure and energy security. The sight of the two presidents standing together with businessmen rather than individually with their military generals and security chiefs, therefore, is a welcome development.

How Climate Change Is Damaging Agriculture and Food Security in Tajikistan

Over the past 30 years, cotton production in Tajikistan has dropped by a staggering 56%. Among the many contributing factors are a lack of investment, outdated agricultural technology, and, notably, climate change. While humanity is not yet capable of stopping climate change, there are ways to adapt, prevent or mitigate the consequences of natural disasters, glacier melt, droughts, and to preserve biodiversity.

Agricultural GDP is growing — but slowly

The agricultural sector is among the most vulnerable to climate change, yet it remains the cornerstone of food security in Tajikistan. Moreover, a significant portion of the population depends on agriculture for their livelihood.

According to official statistics, Tajikistan’s population exceeds 10 million, with more than 7 million living in rural areas. Of the total population, 60% are engaged in agricultural activities, while the official unemployment rate stands at 7.9%.

Data from the Agency on Statistics under the President of the Republic of Tajikistan shows that agriculture contributes approximately 25% of the country’s GDP and accounts for a similar share of exports. The sector also generates 35% of national tax revenues. Beyond food production, agriculture supplies raw materials to various industries, meaning that the livelihoods of countless small and medium-sized enterprises depend directly on its productivity.

Despite modest growth in gross agricultural output, the pace remains slow. At the same time, food prices continue to rise on domestic markets, making it increasingly difficult for families to afford a balanced diet. Local farmers and entrepreneurs often attribute price hikes to fluctuations in the U.S. dollar exchange rate, especially given the sector’s reliance on imported fertilizers, machinery, and packaging

Food Security at Risk

When measured in U.S. dollars, agricultural income has remained relatively stagnant—indicating a lack of real progress and underscoring the need for urgent reforms. Compounding the issue is Tajikistan’s annual population growth rate of 2.7%, which places additional strain on the food system. Without strategic investments in irrigation, land expansion, and climate-resilient technologies, the country risks facing a systemic food shortage in the coming decades.

According to the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), 60% of Tajikistan’s population suffers from food insecurity—meaning they lack sufficient access to the calories and nutrients needed for a healthy and active life.

An Idea in Need of Investment

Matlub Rakhmonov, an agricultural specialist, analyzed the impact of climate change on Tajikistan’s agrarian sector, particularly in horticulture.

“For more than ten years now, in several regions of Tajikistan, some small and medium-sized business owners involved in horticulture have not only failed to secure a full harvest, but have also incurred losses,” says Rakhmonov. “The reason for this is increasingly due to unusually warm days at the end of winter, which cause fruit-bearing trees to bloom prematurely. Then, in late April and early May, sharp cold snaps hit, the blossoms fall, and the resulting crops are destroyed.”

Moreover, climate change has led to frequent natural anomalies, causing some traditional tree species to stop responding to seasonal changes. In the past, Tajikistan made widespread efforts to implement intensive orchard farming, but some regions refrained, fearing low yields similar to previous years.

Today, many of those traditional trees have adapted and no longer rely on strict seasonality. As a result, they can now be used to establish intensive orchards at higher elevations—between 2,000 and 2,500 meters above sea level—a practice that was previously considered unfeasible.

Rakhmonov’s idea is quite promising, but likely not yet fully viable for Tajikistan, as such initiatives require significant investment. Innovative orchards are complex systems based on modern technology and include interactive elements.

Overall, Tajikistan has around 500 varieties of agricultural crops. The total area suitable for agriculture is 7.2 million hectares, most of which is used as pastureland for livestock. Arable land for crops amounts to just 675,000 hectares, of which only 470,000 hectares are irrigated. About 180,000 hectares of this land are devoted to orchards and vineyards.

Changing Hydrometeorological Conditions: A Growing Challenge for Agriculture

Climate change is already reshaping the structure of agricultural production in Tajikistan. A comparison of land use between 1991 and 2024 reveals significant shifts: cotton production has declined by 56%, while the area under grain cultivation has increased by more than 60%. These changes reflect not only evolving economic priorities but also farmers’ responses to increasingly unpredictable weather patterns.

Professor Qaisar Saddiq of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK) explains: “In Tajikistan, 50–70% of arable land depends on irrigation, making it highly vulnerable to the projected reduction in river flow caused by accelerated glacier melt. This is particularly critical for water-intensive crops like cotton. Under high-emissions climate scenarios, we expect a moderate increase in extreme precipitation events and a significant rise in the number of hot days and tropical nights. These changes will likely lead to more frequent and intense droughts, directly affecting both the quality and quantity of agricultural yields.”

Three Key Vulnerabilities of Tajikistan’s Agricultural Sector

  1. Climate Risks Droughts, floods, soil erosion, and pest outbreaks are reducing crop yields and threatening biodiversity. Adapting to these risks requires the development of climate-resilient crop varieties, efficient water and soil management, and the adoption of modern agricultural technologies.
  2. Lack of Investment Limited access to credit, insurance, and modern markets hinders the sector’s modernization. Without adequate financial support, agriculture in Tajikistan struggles to remain competitive and expand its export potential.
  3. Technological Backwardness The sector still relies heavily on outdated traditional methods. A lack of mechanization and skilled specialists leads to significant losses in productivity, resources, and income.

A Complex Problem Requires a Comprehensive Solution

It is clear that climate change is not the only factor undermining the resilience of Tajikistan’s agricultural sector. A combination of environmental, economic, and institutional challenges continues to erode its competitiveness. In 2024, cotton production remains in decline—down by 56% compared to 1991—while food prices continue to rise. These trends underscore the urgent need for systemic and long-term solutions.

Professor Qaisar Saddiq of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK) offers several key recommendations:

  • Promote sustainable water resource management in agriculture, including the modernization of irrigation systems and the adoption of water-saving technologies;
  • Enhance climate literacy among farmers, agribusinesses, and financial institutions through training, advisory services, and access to climate data;
  • Ensure access to weather and climate information for seasonal and long-term planning by the Ministry of Agriculture, local producers, and agricultural consultants;
  • Support income diversification and risk-sharing strategies to strengthen the resilience of rural households and farming systems.

However, these recommendations must be accompanied by concrete state support. Many countries—both developed and developing—have already implemented such measures. For example, in 2023, the European Union introduced a new basic income support scheme for farmers, replacing previous greening and base payments. The average support was approximately €156 per hectare, while young farmers received up to €116 per hectare on land up to 120 hectares.

All of this points to a clear conclusion: climate adaptation must be approached holistically. Farmers cannot be left to face these challenges alone. Without coordinated financial, technological, and institutional support, Tajikistan risks not only losing its food security but also its historical status as a leading cotton producer in the post-Soviet region.

Torture in Tajikistan: A Systemic Problem Demanding Deep Reform

Despite recent legislative improvements and mounting international scrutiny, torture remains a persistent issue in Tajikistan. Experts warn that without comprehensive reform of law enforcement institutions and the establishment of independent oversight mechanisms, the problem is unlikely to be resolved anytime soon.

Legislative Progress Fails to Translate into Practice

Tajikistan has taken some legal steps in recent years to address the issue. Laws have been strengthened, more cases are being investigated, and several police officers have faced prosecution.

“In the past two to three years, there has been gradual progress both in legislation and in the review of torture cases,” said Khushbakht Isoev, a torture documentation specialist at the human rights NGO Mir Prava and a member of the Coalition Against Torture in Tajikistan.

However, Isoev notes that violent abuse by law enforcement officers, especially during detention, continues to be documented. Most cases never make it to court due to insufficient evidence or pressure on victims to remain silent.

25 Torture Complaints in 18 Months

According to data from the Coalition Against Torture, 25 complaints were filed against law enforcement agencies in 2024 and the first half of 2025. The majority, 17 cases, were directed at the Ministry of Internal Affairs, while others involved the State Committee for National Security, anti-corruption bodies, and drug control agencies. One complaint named employees of the General Prosecutor’s Office.

The geographic distribution of these complaints spans the country: 11 came from Sughd Province, six from Dushanbe, and the remainder from Gorno-Badakhshan Autonomous Oblast (GBAO) and other districts under direct central administration.

Human rights defenders assisted 11 victims in securing legal representation and provided legal consultations to 14 others. They also prepared over 70 procedural documents and issued more than 100 oral legal recommendations.

Yet, as Isoev points out, criminal charges are rarely pursued. “Torture is denied and rarely substantiated with evidence,” he said.

Since January 2024, only six cases involving law enforcement officers have led to criminal proceedings. One of these cases dates back seven years and was only reopened after the accused was located. Some trials have resulted in sentencing, while others remain under investigation. Still, the number of prosecutions remains disproportionately low compared to the volume of complaints.

Structural Barriers to Justice

In 2012, Tajikistan introduced Article 143(1) into its Criminal Code, criminalizing torture as a distinct offense. This allowed lawyers and activists to move beyond vague “abuse of power” charges and pursue more precise legal accountability.

“Introducing a specific article on torture was a critical step, but it has not addressed the systemic nature of the problem,” Isoev emphasized.

One of the key obstacles is the inherent conflict of interest in the investigation process: cases of alleged torture are typically handled by the very agencies whose officers are accused. This creates opportunities for evidence tampering, witness intimidation, and coercion of victims into rejecting legal representation.

Many detainees and their families are pressured not to file complaints or to forego legal counsel. Torture cases are often delayed without justification, and victims remain fearful of retaliation.

“All of this contributes to the continued existence of torture in the country,” said Isoev.

UN Rules Gulnara Karimova’s Arrest Was Unlawful and Arbitrary

The United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention has determined that the 2014 arrest of Gulnara Karimova, daughter of Uzbekistan’s late President Islam Karimov, was both unlawful and arbitrary. The finding was published in a recent report on the website of the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights.

The Working Group reviewed the case under its standard communications procedure following a petition submitted in late 2024. According to the report, Karimova was detained in February 2014 without a warrant and held under varying conditions, including 18 months of house arrest alongside her child. Her first judicial appearance occurred only on August 21, 2015, reportedly in a hearing conducted in her kitchen.

During this period, she was denied a genuine opportunity to contest her detention or understand the charges brought against her. The UN body concluded that Uzbekistan violated several provisions of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, including the rights to prompt judicial review, to be informed of the charges, and to access legal counsel.

International and Domestic Legal Violations

Parallel to domestic proceedings, legal action in a third country led to convictions of several co-defendants for laundering over $600 million through companies connected to Karimova. Although her legal team contested asset forfeitures abroad, Karimova has alleged that Uzbek authorities pressured her lawyers to withdraw their motions.

The Working Group has called on the Uzbek government to provide Karimova with reparations, including financial compensation, and to conduct a “full and independent investigation” into her arbitrary detention. It also urged accountability for those responsible.

The UN panel initially requested the government’s response by February 24, 2025. However, Uzbekistan submitted its response one day late, rendering it procedurally invalid. As a result, the Group issued its opinion based solely on the information available.

Both the Uzbek government and the petitioner have been requested to submit updates within six months. These should address whether compensation has been provided, whether an investigation has been conducted, and whether any legal reforms have been implemented in response to the ruling.

The decision strengthens the UN’s ongoing calls for Uzbekistan to bring its judicial practices in line with international human rights standards, including the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

Asset Recovery Agreement with Switzerland

In a related development, Uzbekistan and Switzerland signed an agreement in February 2025 to return approximately $182 million in assets confiscated from Karimova. The funds had been frozen by Swiss prosecutors in 2012 as part of a wide-ranging corruption investigation.

Under the agreement, the funds will be transferred to Uzbekistan through the UN-administered Uzbekistan Vision 2030 Fund. This follows an earlier accord in August 2022 to return $131 million, bringing the total amount of repatriated assets to $313 million.

The case of Gulnara Karimova continues to draw comparisons to that of Dariga Nazarbayeva, the eldest daughter of former Kazakh President Nursultan Nazarbayev. While Karimova faced prosecution and widespread asset seizures, Nazarbayeva retained her political influence and substantial wealth.

Kyrgyzstan Advances New Cross-Border Transport Corridor with China via Bedel Pass

Kyrgyzstan is advancing plans to develop a new international transport corridor through the Bedel checkpoint on the Chinese border, aiming to boost cross-border trade and reduce reliance on high-altitude routes that are often impassable in winter.

Bedel Corridor Gains Momentum

The proposed corridor was a central focus during Deputy Chairman of the Cabinet of Ministers Bakyt Torobaev’s July 8 visit to Beijing. Torobaev met with Chinese corporate leaders to discuss the construction of the Barskoon-Uchturfan-Aksu highway, which would link Kyrgyzstan’s Issyk-Kul Region with China’s Aksu Prefecture in Xinjiang via the Bedel Pass.

The Bedel checkpoint, located in a remote mountainous region of southeastern Kyrgyzstan, was first opened under a simplified regime in September 2024. It lies roughly equidistant from Karakol and Aksu and currently operates with temporary infrastructure. According to the Kyrgyz government, the route’s full-scale development, including a modern highway and internationally compliant border facilities, is scheduled for completion by 2027.

Bedel will become Kyrgyzstan’s third automobile crossing point with China, alongside the Irkeshtam (Osh Region) and Torugart (Naryn Region) passes. These older routes are frequently disrupted by severe winter weather. The new corridor is expected to offer a more reliable and time-efficient alternative for cargo moving between Xinjiang and Kyrgyzstan, reducing dependence on the longer Kashgar-Torugart-Naryn-Bishkek route.

In Beijing, Torobaev and Chinese officials agreed to organize reciprocal business visits and establish joint working groups with representatives from both governments to coordinate the project.

The corridor is expected to strengthen Kyrgyzstan’s role as a regional transit hub, facilitating the re-export of Chinese goods to third countries. Bilateral trade between Kyrgyzstan and China reached $23 billion in 2024, an eightfold increase in recent years.

Progress on China-Kyrgyzstan-Uzbekistan Railway

During his Beijing visit, Torobaev also attended the 12th World Congress on High-Speed Rail, where he emphasized the strategic importance of the China-Kyrgyzstan-Uzbekistan (CKU) railway project.

The 523-kilometer line includes 304 kilometers running through Kyrgyz territory. Construction officially began on December 27, 2024, in Jalal-Abad. Once complete, the railway will link China’s Kashgar with the Kyrgyz cities, Torugart, Makmal, and Jalal-Abad, before continuing to Andijan in Uzbekistan. The project is designed to handle up to 15 million tons of cargo annually and carries an estimated investment of $4.7 billion.

Torobaev noted that the Makmal transshipment station will serve as the core logistics hub on the Kyrgyz side, featuring customs infrastructure, storage facilities, and multimodal services to ensure smooth cargo transit between China and Uzbekistan.

“The CKU railway is the shortest route between East and West,” he said. “It will connect China to European and Middle Eastern markets, forming a vital transport artery.”

Torobaev also announced a proposed rail extension between Aksu in China and Balykchy in Kyrgyzstan via the Bedel checkpoint, which would further enhance the regional transport network.

Kyrgyzstan Expands Labor Cooperation with Japan to Promote Safe Migration

Kyrgyzstan is strengthening labor migration ties with Japan as part of a broader strategy to diversify employment opportunities for its citizens abroad. The Ministry of Labor, Social Security and Migration is working to establish safe, legal, and skills-based pathways for Kyrgyz workers to access the Japanese labor market, in line with international labor standards and Japan’s workforce demands.

On July 2, officials from the Ministry’s Center for Employment of Citizens Abroad met in Bishkek with representatives from the Japan Association for Construction Human Resources (JAC), an organization that facilitates the recruitment of specified skilled workers in Japan’s construction sector.

The two sides discussed plans to create a specialized training center in Kyrgyzstan to prepare construction professionals according to Japanese industry standards. They also agreed to develop free Japanese language courses to enhance the employability of Kyrgyz job seekers.

In May, Kyrgyz Minister of Labor Ravshanbek Sabirov held talks with Hitoshi Kanamori, President of IM Japan, the largest Japanese organization overseeing the technical intern training program. The discussions focused on expanding structured employment pathways for Kyrgyz nationals in Japan.

The Kyrgyz side reiterated its commitment to training workers in fields currently in high demand in Japan, including IT, social services, hospitality, and skilled trades such as welding. Both parties stressed the importance of integrating vocational training with Japanese language instruction.

Minister Sabirov also emphasized the need to ensure labor protections for Kyrgyz citizens working abroad.

“It is important that Kyrgyz specialists not only secure employment but also have access to social insurance, legal protection, and consistent communication with Kyrgyz government bodies,” he said.

While Russia remains the primary destination for Kyrgyz labor migrants, recent years have seen growing interest in alternative destinations such as Turkey, South Korea, Japan, and parts of Europe.