• KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00215 0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10680 0%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28530 0%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00215 0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10680 0%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28530 0%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00215 0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10680 0%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28530 0%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00215 0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10680 0%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28530 0%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00215 0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10680 0%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28530 0%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00215 0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10680 0%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28530 0%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00215 0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10680 0%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28530 0%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00215 0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10680 0%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28530 0%

Artist Aigerim Karibayeva on How Kazakhstan Is Searching for Its Visual Identity

Kazakh artist Aigerim Karibayeva is part of a new visual wave that seeks to blend traditional culture and contemporary aesthetics. Her distinctive style – bright, airy, almost spring-like imagery infused with ethnic motifs and scenes from everyday life – has moved beyond social media into major exhibition spaces. Her works are currently on display at the Kasteyev State Museum of Arts, where her solo exhibition My Sky Above Me recently opened.

In an interview with The Times of Central Asia, she discusses how she coined the term “ethno-modernism,” why ethnic aesthetics is surging in popularity, and how Kazakhstan is searching for its own visual identity.

TCA: Aigerim, you describe your work as “ethno-modernism.” How did you arrive at that concept?

Aigerim Karibayeva: I started moving in this direction and sharing my work on Instagram several years ago. I quickly found my audience; there was strong interest from the media and many interviews. To talk about my work, I needed a term that would define it, something verbal. But I didn’t want to call it simply “contemporary art,” because that didn’t reflect the essence of what I do. I thought: why not call it “ethno-modernism”?

I consulted the well-known art historian Olga Baturina, and she approved. The term immediately caught on. I now see it used in the press, on social media, and even in the profiles of young designers. Today, “ethno-modernism” is used to describe an entire wave of artists and designers, the boom we’ve been seeing over the past five years.

TCA: Why do you think ethno-modernism has become so popular now?

Aigerim Karibayeva: I think it’s been building for a long time. I’m trained as a graphic designer, so I have a strong visual awareness. I saw how interest in national style and ethnic elements gradually emerged in the country.

First, businesses began using it in branding, then advertising picked it up, and eventually it spread into mass culture. Now, ethnic elements combined with modern aesthetics have become a visible part of everyday life.

From a personal photo archive

TCA: That was especially noticeable during recent Nauryz celebrations – everyone seemed to be wearing ethnic-inspired clothing.

Aigerim Karibayeva: Exactly. Everyone is searching for a new cultural code right now, artists, musicians, filmmakers, craftspeople. At first, you create something within your own circle, among fellow artists, and then it spreads outward.

You start seeing and hearing it everywhere, for example, in new interpretations of Kazakh music. You recognize that mix, and it becomes a kind of key. You try to translate that same cultural fusion into your own work.

I’ve had people tell me they were inspired by my work. One woman approached me and said that after seeing a traditional headpiece, a taqiya, in my illustration, she was inspired to start making them herself and  launched a successful business. That’s how this wave works, there’s a ripple effect, and everyone picks it up.

TCA: There’s clearly strong demand for ethnic aesthetics right now.

Aigerim Karibayeva: I see it like this: imagine a vast expanse of gray asphalt, and suddenly a bright red flower grows in the middle. Your mind reacts instantly, it’s something striking, something that draws attention. That’s what contemporary ethnic aesthetics are like.

For a long time, there was a kind of vacuum, we didn’t know how to adapt our cultural code to modern realities in a way that felt authentic rather than kitsch. But there was a hunger for that authenticity. That’s why this boom happened.

TCA: Could it also be a response to globalization? Ethnic styles are trending worldwide.

Aigerim Karibayeva: Yes, but there are cultures whose visual identity we all instantly recognize, Japan, India, African countries. You hear the name and immediately picture colors, textures, symbols.

England brings to mind the monarchy, Tower Bridge, guards in bearskin hats. France, the Eiffel Tower and berets. Russia matryoshka dolls, winter. Even a Georgian khinkali dish has become a global symbol.

I realized that I could easily name symbols of other cultures, but struggled to identify recognizable symbols of Kazakhstan that could be just as portable and widely understood.

TCA: So you set out to create those symbols, your illustrations of Kazakh girls in traditional dress, flying on scooters, scattering stars, holding the sun?

Aigerim Karibayeva: Yes, my background as an illustrator played a big role. I only recently began focusing more on painting. I started with illustration, which is easier to consume as it’s more accessible.

Painting is harder to translate into digital formats. You can’t easily capture it on a phone or turn it into social media content. But digital illustration allowed me to create light, modern, visually appealing images. That’s how it all began.

Image courtesy of Aigerim Karibayeva

TCA: Did your early works go viral?

Aigerim Karibayeva: Yes, but it was a combination of circumstances. I had just gone on maternity leave and was exhausted from my work as a designer. It can be very demanding. I still needed income, but I wanted something less intense.

I decided that during my second maternity leave, I wanted to be a “relaxed mom” with a small income and more rest. So I started drawing. I printed my illustrations on everything I could – postcards, mugs, posters. I even arranged with a café to display and sell them. That’s how it all started.

TCA: That was essentially merchandise with Kazakh motifs?

Aigerim Karibayeva: Yes, exactly. At first, it felt unfamiliar, even uncomfortable. There’s a stereotype that a “real” artist should stand at an easel, not sell postcards. But eventually, it became something I truly enjoyed.

I also had Instagram, and I thought it would be great, I could go to cafés with my child, have coffee, create content, invite followers to places where my work was sold and meet them in person.

TCA: Can Kazakh visual culture become as globally recognizable as, say, that of Japan?

Aigerim Karibayeva: Right now, we’re institutionally invisible. Our region isn’t fully integrated into the global art map. I see it not only in museums but also in fashion. Major designers often draw on deep cultural traditions, but I can’t recall Kazakh identity being widely used.

That said, I think it will happen soon. There are early signs, for example, a Louis Vuitton campaign in St. Moritz featured a structure resembling a traditional yurt. The first steps have been taken. The potential is huge.

TCA: Should this process be accelerated, or will it happen naturally?

Aigerim Karibayeva: It will happen naturally, because fashion and culture are always searching for something new and unique. Creative directors are constantly looking for inspiration.

Uzbek patterns and Russian styles have already been explored. Kazakh culture remains something of a mystery, and that’s its strength.

Image courtesy of Aigerim Karibayeva

TCA: So it’s a matter of time?

Aigerim Karibayeva: Yes, time, development, and our own awareness. Within the creative community, a lot is already happening: new fashion, jewelry, painting, applied arts. It’s all becoming more diverse, and that’s key.

Art shouldn’t exist only in museums. It should be everywhere. Graffiti, illustration, animation, installations – there should be space for all forms. When that diversity exists, people begin encountering art everywhere, in the streets, in stores, in everyday life.

TCA: Do you think art works best when it reaches a mass audience?

Aigerim Karibayeva: Yes, and I try to make my work accessible to everyone.

TCA: That explains your many collaborations from chocolate packaging to airline visuals?

Aigerim Karibayeva: Exactly. I came to this intuitively by observing how artists in Europe work. They create prints from their paintings, sign limited editions, and sell them alongside originals.

Some even open their own stores where their entire artistic world is present, on clothing, shoes, objects. I saw that model and wanted to do the same. It attracted brands, and we created memorable collaborations.

TCA: What about museums in Kazakhstan? Are they sufficient to nurture globally competitive artists?

Aigerim Karibayeva: Museums are important, but not always decisive. I sometimes wonder what shaped me: I grew up in Karaganda, surrounded by steppe, mines, and gray apartment blocks. My strongest childhood memory of art is painted walls in a clinic, scenes from a Russian fairy tale. They made a huge impression on me. Even small visual experiences can leave a lasting mark.

TCA: Your career seems to have developed against the odds, you grew up in a harsh environment, yet your art is light and colorful.

Aigerim Karibayeva: Yes, much of what’s happening now is “in spite of” circumstances. I had no formal art education when I moved to Almaty in 2005 to apply to the Zhurgenov Kazakh National Academy of Arts. I was 17 and didn’t have the ideal environment, but talent still found a way to grow.

TCA: Is Kazakhstan a supportive environment for creative development today?

Aigerim Karibayeva: Yes, because attitudes have changed. Parents now support their children’s talents more. Before, if a child liked drawing, it could seem unusual. Now, parents encourage it, enroll kids in classes, and help them develop.

There are also more opportunities – UNESCO clubs, for example. I think this new generation will produce strong artists.

Image courtesy of Aigerim Karibayeva

TCA: You are now a UNESCO ambassador. What does that mean to you?

Aigerim Karibayeva: I’ve only just begun to engage with it, but I’m very excited. It’s a large and important initiative focused on development and unlocking potential. What inspires me most is its inclusivity; children from rural areas can participate as well.

I have a colleague, Sayan Baigaliyev, who came through this system and is now an internationally exhibiting artist. It shows what’s possible.

TCA: Are you invited to international projects?

Aigerim Karibayeva: Not often, but it does happen. Earlier this year, I was invited to Japan as the only representative of Kazakh art for a short program, but I couldn’t attend due to prior travel plans.

Next time, I won’t miss such an opportunity. I would be proud to represent my country internationally.

Russia to Build University Campus in Bishkek

The Cabinet of Ministers of Kyrgyzstan has approved the reclassification of land in southern Bishkek for the construction of a new campus for the Kyrgyz-Russian Slavic University, the government said.

The decree, signed on April 24 by Prime Minister Adylbek Kasymaliev, transfers the land from agricultural use to settlement status.

The project is being implemented under an intergovernmental agreement between Kyrgyzstan and Russia following the state visit of Vladimir Putin to Bishkek in November 2025. It involves the construction of a university campus spanning approximately 30 hectares.

Officials say the campus will form part of a long-term strategy to develop educational infrastructure and deepen humanitarian cooperation between the two countries.

The new complex is designed to accommodate up to 15,000 students and will include academic, research, and social facilities in line with international higher education standards.

Construction is expected to be completed by 2030, with funding to be provided jointly by both sides.

It is part of a wider educational push by Russia to bolster the influence of Russian language in the region. Russian cultural organisation Evrasiya, a non-profit organisation linked to the Kremlin, has invested heavily in Kyrgyzstan since 2024.

President Sadyr Japarov has instructed that the campus be equipped with modern facilities, while the Finance Ministry has been tasked with allocating funds for the necessary engineering infrastructure.

Once the decree comes into force, local authorities will be required to terminate third-party rights to the land allocated for the project. Most of the site is currently state-owned, though part remains in private hands.

Authorities also noted the need to comply with environmental, sanitary, and urban planning standards, including measures to improve seismic resilience – a perennial fear for Central Asian cities.

The agreement on the campus construction was previously ratified by the parliaments of both countries, including Russia’s State Duma and the Federation Council.

Meat Prices in Tajikistan Among Highest in Central Asia

Beef prices in Tajikistan remain among the highest in Central Asia, with average retail prices ranging from $10 to $11 per kilogram, higher than in neighboring Kyrgyzstan, Kazakhstan, and Turkmenistan.

By comparison, beef costs around $7.6 per kilogram in Kyrgyzstan, approximately $7-7.5 in Turkmenistan, and about $8.66 in Kazakhstan. Uzbekistan is at a similar level to Tajikistan, with prices averaging $10.85 per kilogram.

Globally, meat prices continue to rise. According to the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), prices increased by about 1% in March compared with February and were up 8% year-on-year.

Analysts say the increase is largely driven by rising pork prices, particularly in Europe, along with reduced meat production in Brazil. At the same time, lamb and poultry prices have edged down slightly. Experts warn that declining production in the United States and Brazil, combined with strong demand in Europe, could push beef prices even higher.

The highest beef prices globally are recorded in Switzerland, where they reach $45.72 per kilogram. Other high-cost markets include Norway ($32.67), Luxembourg ($27.09), South Korea ($25.23), and Singapore ($25.02). The lowest prices are found in Nigeria ($4.56), Pakistan ($4.70), Kenya ($5.17), India ($5.33), and Nepal ($5.40).

Among former Soviet countries, price differences are also significant, with the highest costs in the Baltic states. In Estonia, beef is priced at $20.48 per kilogram; in Latvia, $13.71; and in Lithuania, $12.43. Mid-range prices are seen in Armenia ($11.59), Russia ($10.80), Azerbaijan ($10.64), and Georgia ($9.91). Lower prices are found in Belarus ($9.25), Moldova ($8.59), and Ukraine ($7.22).

Despite high prices, domestic meat production in Tajikistan is increasing. According to official data, output of livestock and poultry (in live weight) reached 54,700 tons in January-March 2026, up 11.5% year-on-year.

However, prices remain elevated due to supply shortages. The country meets only about 58% of domestic demand, while imports account for just 4-6% of the market. Imported meat, particularly from Belarus and Kazakhstan, is cheaper and helps contain prices, but due to consumer preferences it is mainly used in the food service sector and does not replace locally produced meat.

Experts say the high cost of meat in Tajikistan is driven by structural factors, including underdeveloped livestock farming, feed shortages, and limited systemic support for farmers. Imports, they note, provide only temporary relief and do not address the underlying causes of high prices.

From Kazakhstan to International Ballet: Meirambek Nazargozhayev’s Rise

Meirambek Nazargozhayev’s journey is a remarkable story of talent, determination, and transformation. Hailing from the small village of Karaoy in Kazakhstan’s Almaty region, he grew up like many boys in the countryside, playing football and the dombra, with little connection to the world of classical ballet. Today, however, he is a principal soloist at the Royal Danish Theatre, one of Europe’s most prestigious cultural institutions.

Ballet was not part of Nazargozhayev’s childhood dreams. His path changed thanks to his aunt Farida, a choreographic instructor in Almaty, who noticed his potential early on and encouraged him to pursue dance. At the age of ten, he entered professional training, marking the beginning of an unexpected but extraordinary career.

Creativity had always been part of his life. He recalls being drawn to music and performance from an early age, playing instruments, exploring artistic interests, and taking part in local cultural activities. In 2006, he was admitted to a choreographic school in Almaty, where he trained intensively. Watching dancers glide and leap across the stage left a lasting impression, turning his initial curiosity into a deep passion for ballet.

From a personal photo archive

With consistent effort and discipline, Nazargozhayev soon began gaining international recognition and winning awards. His artistic path echoes the words of Rabindranath Tagore, who described art as an expression of the inner self.

While many of his classmates aimed to join local theaters in Astana or Almaty, Nazargozhayev aspired to build a career abroad. He first moved to Moscow, where he spent eight months working at a major theater, performing key roles and refining his skills. Eager to broaden his horizons, he then turned to Europe, known for its rich ballet traditions and high professional standards.

His European career began in Kiel, Germany, where his distinctive style and talent quickly earned him a contract. He flourished there, particularly in contemporary dance, a genre he continues to value deeply.

During his time in Germany, he heard a great deal about the Royal Danish Theatre, which soon became his ultimate goal. An offer from a major theater in Madrid followed, promising strong prospects. Shortly afterward, however, he received an invitation from the Royal Danish Theatre, the very stage he had long dreamed of joining.

From a personal photo archive

“I was in disbelief,” he admits. “I had applied, but I never imagined I would actually be accepted.”

After joining the company, Nazargozhayev made an immediate impact by performing a solo role in Jiří Kylián’s ballet 27’52”, an opportunity rarely given to new members. His performance captivated both audiences and colleagues, establishing him as a standout artist.

Over the past eight years, he has continued to grow professionally, appearing on major stages across Europe, China, North America, and at the Kremlin Palace. In recognition of his excellence and dedication, the Royal Danish Theatre granted him a lifelong soloist contract, an honor reserved for only the most distinguished performers.

He has also performed before the Danish royal family, marking a major achievement in his international career.

From a personal photo archive

Today, Nazargozhayev is a leading figure in ballet and a prominent cultural representative of Kazakhstan. His journey from a remote village to some of the world’s leading stages reflects what can be achieved through hard work, courage, and determination.

Victory, Memory, and Moscow: Central Asia’s Changing May Calendar

May is when Central Asia’s past crowds into the public square. Workers, soldiers, veterans, constitutions, unity campaigns, and the legacy of World War II all compete for space on the calendar. The dates are familiar across the region, but their meanings are no longer the same.

Kazakhstan marks People’s Unity Day on May 1, Defenders’ Day on May 7, and Victory Day on May 9. Kyrgyzstan has a May calendar built around Labor Day, Constitution Day, and Victory Day. Uzbekistan has recast May 9 as the Day of Remembrance and Honor. Turkmenistan lists May 9 as Victory Day of the 1941-1945 Great Patriotic War, but it no longer carries the same public weight as the country’s main state holidays.

Those choices show how each state is handling its Soviet past. May 1 can mean labor, unity, or almost nothing. May 9 can mean victory, mourning, family memory, or careful diplomacy. In Central Asia, the politics of memory rarely move through open rejection. It works through renaming, recalibrating, and changing the optics.

Russia still treats May 9 as a central ritual of state power. Victory Day marks the Soviet defeat of Nazi Germany in what Russia calls the Great Patriotic War. Under Vladimir Putin, it has become a display of military strength, national sacrifice, and confrontation with the West. Since Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, that message has become more direct.

This year, the image projected from Moscow will be weaker. Russia is preparing to hold its May 9 parade on Red Square without the usual display of military hardware. Tanks and missile systems, long central to the spectacle, are being kept away. Russia’s Defense Ministry cited the “current operational situation,” while the Kremlin linked the change to Ukrainian attacks.

For Central Asian governments, that image will be hard to separate from their own handling of Victory Day. Moscow has long used May 9 to gather friendly leaders and place the post-Soviet region inside a shared wartime story. Attendance in Moscow has become a diplomatic signal. Absence has become one too. In recent years, Victory Day diplomacy has shown how Central Asian governments try to respect wartime memory while avoiding full alignment with Russia’s narrative. This year, at least some Central Asian leaders are again expected in Moscow. Kazakhstan’s Kassym-Jomart Tokayev and Kyrgyzstan’s Sadyr Japarov have been reported among those planning to attend, though the Kremlin has not yet published a full list of foreign guests.

Central Asian states cannot simply discard May 9. Millions of people from the region served in the Red Army or worked behind the front during World War II; from Kazakhstan alone, around one million people contributed to the war effort, with nearly 271,000 soldiers still listed as missing. Families still carry those memories. Monuments, veterans’ payments, school events, and wreath-laying ceremonies remain important. For many people, Victory Day is personal before it is geopolitical.

Yet governments have changed the tone. Kazakhstan still marks Victory Day as a public holiday, but large military parades are not at the center of the commemoration. The state tends to favor ceremonies, concerts, veterans’ support, and local memorial events. This leaves space for remembrance without copying Moscow’s militarized script. In Central Asia, Victory Day has often come without much pomp, but with plenty of feeling.

Kazakhstan’s May sequence makes that layering unusually clear. May 1 is People’s Unity Day, tied to the country’s multiethnic identity and the state’s long-running focus on interethnic harmony. May 7 marks Defenders’ Day, linked to the creation of Kazakhstan’s own armed forces after independence. May 9 follows two days later. The order places Soviet victory memory alongside two post-Soviet themes: unity at home and national defense under Kazakhstan’s flag.

Kyrgyzstan keeps May more Soviet-shaped. May 1 remains Labor Day; May 5 is Constitution Day; May 9 is Victory Day. Together, they give the month a strong public rhythm, with work calendars often adjusted around weekends and transferred days off.

Uzbekistan has taken a different path. May 9 is not officially called Victory Day. It is the Day of Remembrance and Honor. The change is subtle, but important. It keeps wartime memory, but moves the focus from military triumph toward mourning and national dignity. In 2026, President Shavkat Mirziyoyev reviewed preparations for the holiday, including military training, support for service members, and events connected to memory and honor. The language lets Uzbekistan remember the dead without placing Moscow at the center of the story.

Tajikistan also retains Labor Day and Victory Day. That continuity reflects close security, migration, and economic ties with Russia. It also reflects Tajikistan’s own wartime losses. But Tajikistan’s calendar also has a separate post-Soviet track. National Unity Day, marked in June, commemorates the end of the country’s civil war. That gives the state two different kinds of remembrance, one Soviet and regional, the other domestic.

Unsurprisingly, Turkmenistan offers a more controlled version. Victory Day remains on the official list of holidays and memorable dates, but it sits inside a calendar dominated by neutrality, independence, the Turkmen horse, carpets, and the poetry of Magtymguly. The Soviet frame survives, but is absorbed into a wider national story.

Across the region, the pattern is not erasure; it is selective preservation. Central Asian states still honor veterans, maintain monuments, and teach World War II as a defining event, but they also rename and soften Soviet holidays. They move the emphasis from Moscow to national capitals, from military victory to remembrance, from class struggle to unity, and from Soviet identity to state sovereignty.

That makes May one of the most revealing months in the regional calendar. The same week can celebrate workers, the constitution, armed forces, unity, sacrifice, and victory. Each country chooses a different mix, and none of those choices is accidental. They say something about relations with Russia, views of Soviet history, and each state’s need to build legitimacy at home.

This year, Russia’s scaled-down parade sharpens the contrast. For years, Victory Day projected strength; in 2026, the absence of tanks and missile systems will project caution. Moscow still presents the Soviet victory as a central part of Russian state identity, but Central Asian governments increasingly frame May 9 through their own national calendars.

The dates are old. Their meanings keep changing.

INMerge Tashkent Showcases Rise of Uzbekistan as Regional Innovation Hub

On April 30, investors, founders and corporate leaders gathered in Uzbekistan’s capital, Tashkent, for the latest incarnation of the INMerge Innovation Summit. The traveling series followed an earlier session in Istanbul and will lead into the main summit scheduled for October 8-9 in Baku.

In Tashkent, discussions centered on a question that continues to define Uzbekistan’s digital trajectory: how to turn rapid growth into a sustainable, interconnected ecosystem capable of competing beyond national borders.

Two core discussions framed the agenda. The first focused on how companies are building digital ecosystems around everyday user needs. The second addressed a more structural issue: whether capital alone is enough to build what some participants called a “Digital Silk Road,” or whether deeper foundations are required.

A Rising Regional Star

The series of summits has been organized by PASHA Holding, an Azerbaijani conglomerate owned by the ruling Aliyev and Pashayev families.

For Tughra Musayeva, Head of Innovations at PASHA Financial Holding and Managing Partner at INMerge Ventures, Uzbekistan stands out as a “rising star of the region”.

“It’s rich in human talent and capital, and increased political support for innovation and tech infrastructure is already showing results,” she told The Times of Central Asia on the sidelines of the event. “In the coming years, we’re going to see many interesting startups and projects emerging from Uzbekistan.”

Musayeva challenged a common assumption about emerging tech markets – that they remain dependent on foreign expertise. In her view, Tashkent already has most of the elements needed to sustain growth internally.

“What we see right now is a very self-sufficient platform. There is infrastructure and the right actors are in place. The next step is about scaling, especially across borders,” she said, pointing to her ambition to increase cross-border collaboration between Central Asia and the Caucasus.

A similar emphasis on connectivity came from her colleague Ulviyya Mehraliyeva, innovation events manager at PASHA Financial Holding and a member of the INMerge team. For her, the Tashkent gathering was part of a broader effort to link ecosystems that often develop in isolation.

“What differentiates us is our focus on connecting ideas, people, ecosystems, and talent with opportunities,” she told TCA. “We believe Tashkent has huge potential. There has been significant investment and development in the startup ecosystem.”

To her, the city is already emerging as a regional hub, but she cautioned that Uzbekistan still has a lot to learn from outside.

“It’s both building your own ecosystem while also learning from others. This is a stage of development. Every region goes through it,” she said. “We believe that collaboration between countries like Azerbaijan and Uzbekistan will only strengthen that.”

Image: TCA

The View from the Ground

Practitioners working within Uzbekistan’s tech sector were more circumspect.

Dalerkhon Nodirov, CEO of IT Park Ventures, offered a more measured view of the country’s technological independence, particularly in the field of artificial intelligence.

“We don’t yet have our own AI models,” he said. “At this stage, we still depend on international players.”

Nevertheless, he noted the ongoing efforts to address this by building local capacity, including the development of datasets that could eventually support homegrown systems.

“We are working on it,” he said. “Later, we may develop our own models and systems. But for now, this is part of the process.”

Uzbekistan’s Unicorn Success Story

That tension between global integration and local development also surfaced during a panel discussion on building “everyday ecosystems,” where companies discussed how they are reshaping consumer behavior.

Kevin Khanda, Chief Product and Technology Officer at Uzum, Uzbekistan’s first tech unicorn, described the company’s experience in shifting Uzbek consumers from traditional, offline shopping habits to digital platforms.

“Our main challenge was understanding how to build trust and maintain it,” he explained. “Without trust, there is no e-commerce.”

Before Uzum entered the market, online retail in Uzbekistan faced serious credibility issues. Delivery reliability was inconsistent, and customers often received items that did not match what they had ordered.

“The service level was around 35% to 40%,” Khanda said. “That means there was a very high chance you would not receive what you expected.”

For Uzum, solving that problem required heavy investment in physical infrastructure, including warehouses that allowed it to control inventory directly.

“All the goods you see on the platform are actually in our warehouses,” he said. “We know exactly what is in stock.”

This approach was complemented by a network of delivery points, introducing an offline element into the online shopping experience. Customers can pick up orders, try items, and return them if necessary.

According to Khanda, Uzum now has more than 1,800 delivery points across Uzbekistan, and the network is expected to grow further.

“Four years ago, if a family in Nukus wanted to buy a television, they might have had to travel to Tashkent and spend two days on the trip,” he said. “Now, they can order it and receive it the next day.”

Image: TCA

Trust extends beyond logistics. In fintech, the stakes are even higher, as users must feel confident that their money is secure.

To address this, Uzum introduced incentives designed to encourage digital payments, including discounts for customers using its financial services.

“Last year, we subsidized more than $15 million in discounts,” he said. “This is also part of building trust, giving people a reason to use the system.”

Challenges Beyond Investment

The discussion highlighted how infrastructure, user experience, and financial incentives intersect in shaping digital ecosystems. It also underscored a broader point raised throughout the summit: technology alone is not enough.

That theme was central to the second panel, which examined whether capital alone can drive the creation of a regional digital economy.

“Capital is important, but it is not everything,” said Musayeva during the discussion. “You need the right environment, the right policies, and the right connections between markets.”

The idea of a “Digital Silk Road”, a network of interconnected tech ecosystems stretching across Central Asia and beyond, remains an aspiration. But events like INMerge suggest that the building blocks are beginning to take shape.

New Talent

The Tashkent roadshow concluded with a startup pitch competition, where selected teams presented their ideas to a panel of regional investors.

Fariza Islamova, a manager in the startup ecosystem development department at IT Park, said the competition attracted strong interest from local entrepreneurs.

“We received around 120 applications, and selected 10 startups to participate,” she told The Times of Central Asia.

Of these 10, three were chosen to advance to the final round of the competition in Baku later this year, earning themselves a shot at the top prize of $50,000.

Screenix AI, which took first place, will receive a fully funded participation package. Two other startups, UGC Market Uzbekistan and Redeem, were awarded partial support.