• KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00216 0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10659 0%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28530 0%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00216 0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10659 0%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28530 0%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00216 0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10659 0%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28530 0%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00216 0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10659 0%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28530 0%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00216 0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10659 0%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28530 0%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00216 0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10659 0%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28530 0%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00216 0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10659 0%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28530 0%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00216 0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10659 0%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28530 0%

Japarov, Tashiyev, and the Kompromat War

Kyrgyzstan has seen three revolutions since 2005. It has been a politically active country since becoming independent in late 1991, when the Soviet Union collapsed. But since the current President Sadyr Japarov came to power after the 2020 revolution, he and his long-time friend and security chief, Kamchybek Tashiyev, have stifled expressions of public discontent.

For the last five years, Kyrgyzstan’s political scene has been uncharacteristically quiet. But events since Japarov sacked Tashiyev on February 10 have raised speculation that a fierce political battle between the two powerful men now looms ahead for the country.

Japarov has already fired the first shots. Accusations of corruption against Tashiyev and his family have led to arrests. But two can play at that game, and the former security likely has compromising information about Japarov and his family.

“You Can’t Cook Two Sheep’s Heads in One Cauldron”

The February 10 announcement of Tashiyev’s firing was arguably Kyrgyzstan’s biggest political shock since the October 2020 revolution that saw Japarov go from a prison cell to simultaneously occupying the posts of prime minister and president within ten days.

The two had been friends for decades, they started their political careers about the same time, and both quickly rose through the ranks of government during the presidency of Kurmanbek Bakiyev, who was ousted in the 2010 revolution. The day after he was confirmed as president, Japarov appointed Tashiyev to be head of the State Committee for National Security (GKNB).

The day before Tashiyev was sacked, a group of 75 prominent figures, who included former government officials, released an open letter to President Japarov and the speaker of parliament calling for an early presidential election. The group pointed to the discrepancy over whether Japarov was serving the six-year presidential term mandated in the 2010 constitution or the five-year term stipulated in the constitution adopted in April 2021, three months after the snap presidential election that Japarov won.

It quickly became apparent that Tashiyev’s dismissal and the letter were connected. The same day Tashiyev was fired, so were several top GKNB officials, with the sacking of officials said to be close to Tashiyev continuing for days. Japarov’s spokesman said it was necessary to “prevent a split in society.”

However, Japarov has avoided any detailed explanation of the reasons for the many changes and repeatedly described Tashiyev as a friend.

Member of Parliament Elvira Surabaldiyeva, in an April 24 interview with a Kazakh journalist, said Tashiyev was dismissed because he was planning a coup and had been preparing it for a long time. “The president is going through a very difficult time right now, because his longtime friend tried to remove him from office,” Surabaldiyeva said, and added, “There’s a saying: ‘You can’t cook two sheep’s heads in one cauldron.’ This seems to be exactly the case.”

Kompromat

Tashiyev was out of Kyrgyzstan when the news broke that he had been fired. He briefly returned on February 13, leaving again on February 17. He returned on March 19 and the same day went to the Interior Ministry as a “witness” to answer questions about Kyrgyzneftegaz, the state oil company.

Kyrgyzstan’s State Tax Service is investigating corruption allegations at Kyrgyzneftegaz that date back more than four years and involve Tashiyev and members of his family. State Tax Service chief Almambet Shykmamatov said on March 17, “Kyrgyzneftegaz was under the complete control of the GKNB,” and that during the time Tashiyev was GKNB chief, it was impossible to check on the company’s activities.

Tashiyev’s nephew, Baigazy Matisakov, who was the head of the Kyrgyzneftegaz refinery, was detained on March 18. Tashiyev’s son, Tay-Muras, who is connected to the private company, Moko Group, that is accused of buying oil and reselling it to Kyrgyzneftegaz, was questioned by the Interior Ministry in March.

At the start of April, Tashiyev’s brother Shairbek was arrested in connection with the Kyrgyzneftegaz investigation. Shairbek was a parliamentary deputy when his brother was fired. Shairbek at first said he was not concerned with his brother’s dismissal and would remain in parliament. He was questioned at the Interior Ministry on March 13 and handed in a letter resigning from parliament the next day.

After Surabaldiyeva’s interview, Japarov spoke with Kaktus Media, and while not confirming there was evidence of a coup plot, he said any decision about Kamchybek Tashiyev’s role was a matter for investigators and the courts.

It seems the net is tightening around Kamchybek Tashiyev and that it might only be a matter of time before he, too, is detained and facing charges.

Two Can Play at that Game

There could be, and probably are, more allegations of wrongdoing involving Kamchybek Tashiyev, members of his family, or close associates. But the business dealings of Japarov and members of his family might not bear scrutiny either.

In March 2017, Japarov was arrested as he tried to re-enter Kyrgyzstan. He fled the country in late 2013 to avoid facing criminal charges that included making death threats, hostage taking, hooliganism, and use of violence against a government official. He was convicted after returning in 2017, and languished in prison until supporters freed him after the October 2020 revolution.

After Japarov became president, the Supreme Court reviewed and overturned the 2017 verdict against him.

At the time he was detained in 2017, Kyrgyzstan’s independent outlet Kaktus Media recalled that in 2009, under then-President Bakiyev, Japarov was head of the Agency for Prevention of Corruption. “It is unclear how Japarov fought corruption,” Kaktus wrote, noting that “there was so much corruption” that it was impossible to keep track of.

The former owner of Investbank Issyk-Kul, Bolot Baykozhoyev, alleged that Japarov embezzled some $400,000 from the bank in 2004. In 2007, Investbank Issyk-Kul was illegally seized by a group that included Bakiyev’s son Maksim and Japarov’s sister Raykul. Just before she was convicted on money laundering charges in 2014 and sentenced to seven years in prison, Raykul fled Kyrgyzstan. In 2015, she was convicted of illegally taking over Investbank Issyk-Kul and sentenced to an additional ten years in prison.

Days after her brother was elected president, Kyrgyzstan’s Supreme Court overturned the verdict against Raykul.

Japarov’s nephew, Ulan Japarov, was detained for corruption in July 2023 and eventually placed under house arrest in October 2023 while his investigation was being conducted. President Japarov said at the time that his nephew’s arrest should serve as an example to all his relatives that he would not intervene if they were caught breaking the law.

While still being investigated for corruption, Ulan Japarov was arrested again in July 2024 for embezzlement, but by September 2024, a Bishkek court had ordered him released.

Japarov has five brothers and five sisters, and they have offspring, so the chances that some in the Japarov clan have been using Sadyr’s position as president to further their own careers cannot be ruled out.

The Uzbek Card

One of the most interesting cards Tashiyev might have and could play concerns Uzbekistan.

On the day of the announcement that Tashiyev had been sacked, there were reports that Uzbek President Shavkat Mirziyoyev and Japarov “held a phone call.” The reports are careful not to clarify who called whom. But the information that is provided, that the two presidents discussed joint railway and hydropower projects, seems questionable, given that Kyrgyzstan was facing what parliamentary deputy Surabaldiyeva now describes as a coup attempt.

As GKNB chief, Tashiyev worked to eradicate organized crime. Some of the links of Kyrgyzstan’s organized criminal world extended into Uzbekistan. In August 2024, the GKNB put out a warrant for Uzbek crime boss Salim Abduvaliyev for his ties to Kyrgyz mafia kingpin Kamchy Kolbayev, aka Kolya Kyrgyz, who was killed in a GKNB raid on a Bishkek restaurant in October 2023.

Two members of Kyrgyzstan’s parliament were stripped of their mandates over ties to Abduvaliyev. Tashiyev said in January 2025 that there was a time when Abduvaliyev “completely” controlled organized crime in southern Kyrgyzstan.

Abduvaliyev supported Mirziyoyev to become Uzbekistan’s new president after the country’s first, and until then, only president, Islam Karimov, died in the summer of 2016. Ahead of the December 2016 snap presidential election, Abduvaliyev posted a photo of himself wearing a T-shirt with Mirziyoyev’s photo and the words “My President” written on it.

An Uzbek court sentenced Abduvaliyev to six years in prison in March 2024, after the notorious crime boss was found guilty of illegal firearms, but he was released for health reasons in January 2025.

There is also the case of Habibullah Abdukadyr, a Chinese-born Uyghur businessman who is allegedly tied to organized criminal networks in Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan.

The GKNB’s investigations into organized crime when Tashiyev headed the security service likely uncovered information about the underworld in Uzbekistan and Uzbek officials connected to organized crime. That might explain the February 10 phone call between Mirziyoyev and Tashiyev, and might also explain why Tashiyev still remains free in Kyrgyzstan.

With Kyrgyzstan set to conduct a presidential election in January 2027, it seems the current standoff cannot last for very long, and the big question now is, will Japarov or Tashiyev make the next move?

Singer MEREY on Kazakh-Language Music, Tradition, and a New Sound

Singer, poet, and lyricist MEREY is among a younger group of artists bringing a different sensibility to music in Kazakhstan. Her work is rooted in Kazakh-language expression, but it also pushes beyond familiar expectations of how a female singer should sound and present herself.

In an interview with The Times of Central Asia, MEREY discusses the influence of poetry on her lyrics, the reaction to experimentation, and what she believes is missing from Kazakhstan’s contemporary music scene.

TCA: Tell us a little about yourself. How did you get into music?

MEREY: I came to music at 17, that’s when I wrote my first song in English. Before that, for as long as I can remember, I had been writing poetry; it was my first form of self-expression.

During my school years, I also studied music more formally. I played in a national orchestra, where I both sang and performed dombra parts. That experience strongly shaped my sense of stage presence and musical language.

Today, I position myself as a poet, singer, and lyricist. For me, text and music are inseparable.

TCA: Who or what influenced your artistic development the most?

MEREY: Since school, I have read the works of Mukaghali Makatayev, a classic of Kazakh poetry known for lyrical verses about love, homeland, and the human experience, and Fariza Ongarsynova, a prominent poet who wrote about emotions, time, and women’s lives. They left a deep mark on me as a poet, and echoes of their style can be found in my lyrics.

As a teenager, I listened to Billie Eilish, Lana Del Rey, and The Neighbourhood. Later, Mitski, Zemfira, Valentin Strykalo, and Børns. Now I feel close to what Chappell Roan and Meg Myers are doing. My taste leans toward alternative music with an emphasis on vocals, lyrics, and guitar riffs, with a slightly detached aesthetic. This directly informs my own music.

TCA: Your music is often described as a blend of traditional elements and modern electronics. How did this sound take shape?

MEREY: I wouldn’t fully agree with the phrasing about electronics, but my sound is in many ways inspired by Darkhan Juzz. He was the first artist from Kazakhstan who truly impressed me with his sound.

I come from a Kazakh-speaking background, so my lyrics tend to be more literary rather than conversational, unlike many artists of the new school. That’s thanks to my parents and my education in a Kazakh-language school.

The modern side comes from my musical tastes, especially the Western scene. My sound combines a Western sensibility with precise, expressive Kazakh language. It’s a mix of Western thinking and Kazakh tradition and that is exactly what resonates with listeners.

TCA: How important is it for you to preserve cultural roots in contemporary music?

MEREY: It is fundamentally important. As I grow older, I become more conscious, and even stricter, about the Kazakh language and tradition. I’m glad that today national elements, ornaments, traditional clothing, interest in Tengriism, and the language itself, are once again becoming part of the cultural conversation among young people.

My goal is to promote proper, expressive Kazakh in music. I consciously use idioms, proverbs, and older speech structures that are gradually disappearing from everyday language. For me, it’s important that the language of my songs remains pure and precise, even if in everyday life I allow myself more freedom.

TCA: Do you feel that music can help reinterpret tradition?

MEREY: Absolutely. Music is a universal language that works on an emotional level, even if the listener does not understand the words.

My music is not strictly traditional, but it is precisely through such hybrid forms that listeners from other countries become interested in our culture. People often write to me asking for translations of my lyrics into English, Turkish, and other languages, they want to understand what I’m singing about.

Tradition is not a fixed concept. It is constantly evolving. It is entirely possible that in 20 years, the music of my generation will also be perceived as part of tradition. It is thanks to new-wave artists, including me, that young people are discovering Kazakh culture in a new context.

TCA: Which traditional Kazakh instruments or musical motifs inspire you the most?

MEREY: I am an improvisational dombra player, and the dombra was my first instrument. My musical ability was noticed at school, after which I studied in an orchestra for gifted children, where we combined vocals and instrumental performance. I still have my first dombra, which is now more than 12 years old. That’s where everything began.

Although I’ve lost some of my former skill, I still regularly listen to küy and terme, they continue to inspire me. I also feel close to instruments such as the zhetygen, shankobyz, and kobyz. Although I don’t play them, I closely follow how they are used in contemporary music. For example, I really connect with how the kobyz is integrated into modern genres whether pop, R&B, or electronic music.

In the future, I want to carefully incorporate traditional instruments into my work. For now, it is technically difficult. There are almost no high-quality plugins for Kazakh instruments in digital production software, so everything has to be recorded live.

For example, in my song Nege Bilmedim? I had planned to use the kobyz to create an anxious atmosphere, but in the end I replaced it with a violin for that reason. I especially liked how the kobyz was integrated into contemporary electronic music in the song Jiber, featured on OYU. This track is performed by my close friend Mira.

I would also mention songs by Yerbolat Qudaibergenov, Lyazzat Alauy and Men Qazaqpyn, where contemporary sound is subtly intertwined with traditional dombra motifs. More recently, there is the track Aitshy, where M’Dee combines kobyz with R&B, creating an interesting and fresh sound.

TCA: Some people are quite sensitive to experiments with traditional music. Have you encountered that kind of reaction from audiences?

MEREY: Yes, quite often. The Kazakh cultural space is generally sensitive to newness and I love experimenting. My song Carpe Diem, where I touch on female sexuality in the Kazakh language, caused a strong reaction. More recently, a live performance of my song Betperde went viral on TikTok, where I experimented with vocal delivery and that triggered a wave of criticism.

People need time to adjust to new things. At the same time, if you look at the Western scene, experimentation with form and presentation is seen as an essential part of artistic expression. For example, Mitski uses the microphone as an expressive, sometimes provocative stage object; Chappell Roan works with visual imagery, including deliberately exaggerated elements; Lana Del Rey turns the stage into a cinematic space; Fergie adds strong physical expressiveness and elements of performance. Western audiences have largely moved beyond expecting “just beautiful singing.” Today, listeners care not only about how an artist sings, but what they communicate through performance, image, and concept.

There is still a fixed idea of what a Kazakh female singer is “supposed” to look like: long hair, restrained style, long dresses, traditional aesthetics. When an artist presents a different visual language, it can create dissonance. I believe the development of a music scene is impossible without experimentation. Artists must stop being afraid, and listeners must learn to accept the new. Kazakhstan’s music scene still has significant room for growth. That growth begins when artists stop fearing experimentation and audiences become more open to innovation.

TCA: How do you assess the development of Kazakhstan’s contemporary music scene?

MEREY: Honestly, as an artist, I often feel disappointed. There is a lack of new names, fresh sound, and bold decisions. Much of it feels repetitive, almost formulaic. At the same time, I recognize that as a listener I might perceive it differently.

TCA: In your view, what can make music from Kazakhstan interesting to a global audience?

MEREY: First of all, language and culture. We have a very rich cultural heritage, and when it is combined with modern genres, it becomes accessible and compelling to the world. When nomadic aesthetics meet contemporary sound, a unique artistic product emerges. That is where our potential for global dialogue lies.

For example, Yenlik, who recently performed on COLORS. By Kazakh standards, she appears quite traditional: long hair, restrained style, Kazakh-language lyrics, and elements of national aesthetics. At the same time, there is a distinctly Western confidence in her delivery, which makes her relatable to international audiences. If she worked exclusively within traditional forms such as throat singing, it would likely remain more local in appeal. But by combining Kazakh elements with rap, she becomes accessible to a broader audience.

TCA: In what direction would you like to develop your sound further?

MEREY: I feel that I’ve outgrown my melancholic indie aesthetic and want to move forward. I’m interested in experimenting with vocals and production, particularly electronic pop, UK drill, techno, and more dance-oriented music. Right now, I’m in a phase of searching for and shaping a new sound.

TCA: What are you working on now, and what can listeners expect soon?

MEREY: I’m preparing for my first tour across Kazakhstan, with concerts in Almaty, Astana, and Shymkent. It will be a large-scale program, almost two and a half hours long, featuring material from my solo album HIGANBANA, as well as guest artists in each city. There will also be merchandise, meet-and-greets, and audience interaction. For me, this is an important and exciting stage.

At the same time, I’m working on my first poetry collection in three languages. Over the years, I’ve accumulated enough material.

TCA: How do you see your art in a few years?

MEREY: For me, creativity is not only music, it also includes poetry, producing, and working with young artists. In the future, I’m also interested in film. More specifically, in three years I see myself as one of Kazakhstan’s leading artists, with a strong audience and the ability to perform on major stages both at home and abroad. It is important for me not only to grow personally, but also to support the next generation of artists. And through all of this, to preserve what matters most: freedom, youth, and a sincere love for what I do.

Middle Corridor Countries Approve 2026 Plan, Focus on Digitalization and Container Growth

On April 24, Astana hosted a meeting of the Board and General Assembly of the international association “Trans-Caspian International Transport Route.”

The Trans-Caspian International Transport Route (TITR), also known as the Middle Corridor, is a multimodal transport corridor linking China and Europe through Central Asia and the South Caucasus, offering an alternative to routes that pass through Russia.

The meetings were attended by representatives of TITR member countries, Kazakhstan, China, Azerbaijan, Georgia, and Turkey, as well as participants from several European countries, including Ukraine, Bulgaria, and Romania, and international partners such as Singapore.

The participating countries approved a detailed work plan for 2026, with a key focus on the digitalization of transport processes. Participants agreed to implement electronic document management using digital signatures and to establish direct data exchange between customs authorities and other stakeholders involved in cargo transportation. According to Kazakhstan’s national rail company, Kazakhstan Temir Zholy (KTZ), these measures are expected to reduce transit times and improve transparency along the route.

The plan also envisages an increase in container traffic, including the transit of 600 container trains from China through Kazakhstan this year. Coordination between ports and terminals on the Caspian Sea will also be strengthened. Overall, the plan is aimed at reinforcing the TITR as a key transit corridor between Asia and Europe.

In the first quarter of 2026, Kazakhstan recorded a significant increase in container train traffic along the TITR, underscoring the country’s growing role in Eurasian logistics. A total of 125 container trains transited through Kazakhstan via the corridor, marking a 34.4% increase compared to the same period in 2025.

As previously reported by The Times of Central Asia, freight volumes transported along the Middle Corridor through Kazakhstan have grown more than fivefold over the past seven years, increasing from 0.8 million tonnes to 4.5 million tonnes annually.

Ukrainian Ambassador to Kazakhstan: From Chornobyl to Zaporizhzhia – Lessons Humanity Risks Forgetting

April 26 marks a date that changed the course of world history. This year marks the 40th anniversary of the Chornobyl nuclear disaster, one of the world’s worst nuclear accidents, the consequences of which are still felt today.

In an interview with The Times of Central Asia, Ukraine’s Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary to Kazakhstan, Victor Mayko, spoke about the scale of the tragedy and emerging threats to nuclear safety.

TCA: Forty years have passed. Why does Chornobyl remain a relevant issue today?

Ambassador Mayko: Because it is not a story that has ended. It is an ongoing process, the consequences of which continue to unfold. Chornobyl is not only the explosion of a reactor; it is the long-term impact on people, nature, and the economy. In terms of scale, it is, without exaggeration, the largest manmade disaster in human history.

TCA: What exactly defines that scale?

Ambassador Mayko: First and foremost, the territory. Around 150,000 square kilometers were contaminated. The most dangerous area is the 10-kilometer zone. Isotopes were recorded there that had not previously been observed; they were formed as a result of processes during the explosion.

According to estimates, this territory will only become suitable for habitation in about 20,000 years, once the decay of radioactive isotopes reaches safe levels.

These were fertile lands, chernozem soils suitable for agriculture. Today, the area is a protected zone, essentially a vast natural reserve where wild animals live. But this is a forced outcome.

TCA: As far as we know, you were personally a liquidator. What did you witness?

Ambassador Mayko: I was sent there through mobilization. I spent almost a month at the plant, in two rotations. I saw people working on the reactor roof, clearing debris and removing radioactive materials. These were difficult, frightening scenes. People went there understanding the risk, but not always fully realizing its scale.

TCA: How many people were affected?

Ambassador Mayko: We still don’t know the exact figures. The Soviet system concealed information. I believe the immediate death toll was at least 10,000. But if we include those who later died from radiation-related illnesses, thyroid cancer, stomach cancer, and others, the number rises into the hundreds of thousands.

In total, around 600,000 people took part in the cleanup. That is an enormous figure.

TCA: Why was information about the accident concealed for so long?

Ambassador Mayko: Because the system was built that way. Until the radioactive cloud moved beyond the borders of the USSR, there was silence. Only when elevated radiation levels were detected in Sweden, Finland, and the United Kingdom did international inquiries begin. Then the Soviet Union was forced to acknowledge the accident.

TCA: How did this affect people in the first days?

Ambassador Mayko: People continued living their normal lives. On May 1, there was a public demonstration. I was there myself with my family, with a small child. No one warned us about the danger. Many felt throat irritation and coughing, but didn’t understand the cause. If people had been informed in time to close windows and stay indoors, it would have been possible to reduce the impact. But that didn’t happen.

TCA: Was there panic?

Ambassador Mayko: It was more fear of the unknown. People didn’t understand what radiation was. Of course, many tried to take their children away. But over time, the situation stabilized. There was no mass panic; rather, anxiety that gradually faded as more information became available.

TCA: How do you assess the role of the liquidators?

Ambassador Mayko: They are heroes, without exaggeration. They saved millions of lives. If not for their actions, the consequences could have been far worse. People worked without fully understanding the level of the threat, but they carried out their task.

TCA: What is happening today at the Chornobyl plant?

Ambassador Mayko: After the accident, a sarcophagus was built, a complex engineering structure designed to isolate the destroyed reactor and prevent radiation leaks. It was an international project that cost billions.

Today, however, its integrity has been compromised. The structure was not designed for military activity. Following a strike by a Russian drone, it sustained serious damage. Now it is no longer simply a question of repair, but of potentially replacing the structure entirely. This presents a serious risk. Any loss of containment is a threat, especially given the structure’s age.

TCA: Much is being said today about the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant. How alarming is the situation there?

Ambassador Mayko: Very alarming. The Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant is the largest nuclear facility in Europe. It is currently under the control of Russian forces and, according to available information, has been mined.

This in itself is unprecedented. There have also been instances when the plant lost external power supply and, therefore, cooling capacity for the reactors. This is a critical risk factor.

TCA: What consequences could this lead to?

Ambassador Mayko: According to some experts, a potential accident at Zaporizhzhia could be several times larger than Chornobyl. Some estimates suggest “up to 100 Chornobyls.” This would put all of Europe and a significant part of Asia at risk.

TCA: Can we say that humanity has learned the lessons of Chornobyl?

Ambassador Mayko: Partially but not fully. We see that even today issues of nuclear safety can be neglected.

The main lesson is that political interests must never be placed above human safety.

The second is transparency: information must be shared immediately, without concealment. And the third is memory. While witnesses are still alive, their stories must be heard and preserved. Only then can we hope to prevent such tragedies in the future.

Astana to Host International AI Film Festival

Astana will host the Astana AI Film Festival (AAIFF 2026) this autumn an international event dedicated to films created using artificial intelligence.

The festival will focus on the growing influence of AI on the creative industries. Its central feature will be an international competition of short films produced using AI technologies, according to the Creative Industries Alliance of Kazakhstan.

Speaking at an awards ceremony for the Alem.ai Battle and AI Governance Cup competitions, President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev said the festival reflects a “fundamental shift” in the development of the creative sector. According to him, AI is transforming the nature of creativity, opening new forms of expression and lowering barriers for creators.

At the same time, Tokayev acknowledged more cautious views suggesting that AI could reshape, or even displace, traditional segments of the creative industries. In this context, he stressed the importance of adapting in a timely manner to emerging technological trends.

The festival is expected to serve as a platform for showcasing innovative approaches to filmmaking and promoting Kazakh creative projects internationally. Applications for participation are set to open in May.

The announcement comes amid broader efforts by Kazakhstan to develop AI. The Times of Central Asia previously reported plans to establish an AI fund backed by the National Bank, aimed at financing key digital projects and educational programs.

Fuel Prices Surge in Tajikistan Amid Middle East Conflict

Fuel prices at gas stations in Dushanbe have risen sharply since early March, increasing on average by 8-9%. The increase has been driven by domestic factors as well as adverse developments in the global energy market.

The most widely used AI-92 gasoline has risen in price from $1.05 to $1.13 per liter. Diesel has followed a similar trend, increasing from $1.14 to $1.24 per liter. Prices for liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) have risen more modestly, by about 6%, to $0.62 per liter. Prices also vary by location, with drivers noting that fuel in central Dushanbe is traditionally more expensive than in outlying areas.

Suppliers attribute the increases to higher prices from producers, but the situation largely depends on external supply chains. Russia remains the primary source of petroleum products for Tajikistan. In 2025, the country imported more than 1.2 million tonnes of fuel and LPG from Russia, accounting for over 70% of total imports. Supplies also come from Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, and Turkmenistan, though their share is significantly smaller.

According to official statistics, Tajikistan imported more than 325,000 metric tons of petroleum products in the first quarter of this year, valued at over $251 million, or approximately $772 per metric ton. Compared with the same period last year, import volumes increased by 11.4%, while their total value rose by 8.6%.

Experts say external factors are the main driver of rising prices. They point to international media reports that the conflict involving the United States, Israel, and Iran has triggered a chain reaction in the fuel market, affecting the supply chain from crude oil to refining and retail prices. A key factor has been disruption in the Strait of Hormuz, through which roughly 20% of global oil supplies pass.

At the same time, price trends have varied significantly across countries. Al Jazeera reported that fuel prices rose by nearly 70% in Cambodia, 50% in Vietnam, 35% in Nigeria, 33% in Laos, and 28% in Canada.

In Central Asia, however, price increases have been more moderate, ranging from 2% to 5% in March and April. In Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan, prices have remained largely stable, which analysts attribute to pricing policies by Russian producers and the availability of domestic fuel supplies.