• KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00193 -0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10866 0.55%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28490 0%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00193 -0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10866 0.55%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28490 0%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00193 -0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10866 0.55%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28490 0%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00193 -0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10866 0.55%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28490 0%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00193 -0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10866 0.55%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28490 0%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00193 -0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10866 0.55%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28490 0%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00193 -0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10866 0.55%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28490 0%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00193 -0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10866 0.55%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28490 0%
11 December 2025

The Twilight of Starlink in Kazakhstan?

For every country in the world, the appearance of the internet has presented vast possibilities but also formidable challenges.

This was especially true in Central Asia where the governments are obsessed with controlling information that can be accessed by the public.

Kazakhstan is unique among the Central Asian states in that the Kazakh government has expended significant energy and resources to make Kazakhstan a modern country with a tech savvy population.

Control over the internet remains an issue and has sparked a debate in Kazakhstan about the use of foreign telecommunications satellites.

Countrywide Connections

In late 2024, Kazakhstan’s Ministry of Digital Development stirred controversy by proposing new regulations on imports of telecommunications equipment. One proposal would ban the use of equipment from foreign companies that do not have control centers inside Kazakhstan.

In December 2024, the Digital Development Ministry specifically named Inmarsat, Thuraya, Iridium, and Starlink as targets for a usage ban. Kazakhstan actually has a national security law that “prohibits the establishment and operation of communication networks within Kazakhstan if their control centers are based outside the country.”

However, Kazakhstan is a large country with most of its population living in roughly the eastern third of its territory. Cities, towns, and villages scattered across the western two-thirds of Kazakhstan are poorly connected to the internet and Kazakh authorities started discussions with Musk’s SpaceX about use of Starlink, a subsidiary of SpaceX with a network of satellites.

In October 2023, Kazakh authorities “introduced broadband internet in ten rural schools using Starlink technology in a test mode.” The pilot project envisioned sending Starlink terminals to 2,000 schools. By April 2024, the system was already connecting 447 rural schools to the internet, and by August the number had climbed to 1,731 schools.

Kill Switch Required

In November 2023, the director of the Ministry of Digital Development’s Telecommunications Committee, Dias Tolegenov, warned citizens that  private use of Starliink terminals was illegal in Kazakhstan. The “current version” of Starlink “violates current (Kazakh) legislation, as it does not meet safety requirements,” Telugenov said.

This ban is still In effect.

In May 2024, the director of Kazakhstan’s Kokterek Space Communications Center, Roman Ermashov, reiterated that according to Kazakhstan’s laws, “projects using foreign satellite communication systems in non-geostationary satellite orbits,” such as Starlink, must have “a gateway (interface) station on the territory of Kazakhstan.”

SpaceX refused to install the station in Kazakhstan.

“This is about safety,” Ermashov said, “Because if any information security incident occurs, such as a data leak, everyone turns to the state.”

This comment by Ermashov cuts to the heart of the matter.

During the mass unrest in Kazakhstan in January 2022, authorities cut off the internet around the country to prevent protesters from coordinating their actions or releasing information about what was happening to the world outside Kazakhstan.

Later that same year, Tajikistan ‘s government cut off the internet connection to the eastern Gorno-Badakhshan Autonomous Oblast during unrest, and Uzbek authorities did the same to the western Karakalpakstan Republic when violence broke out there in early July.

Certainly, Kazakh officials would like to have the ability to provide information to citizens across the country, including rural areas, especially in a time of emergency, such as the severe flooding that hit much of Kazakhstan in 2024.

Kazakh officials, however, do not want citizens to be able to disseminate anti-government information or organize or coordinate protests using technology that the government cannot shut down at a moment’s notice.

Other Options

The laudabe project to connect rural schools to the internet using Starlink is continuing, though that project will finish in 2026 and it is unclear what will happen after that.

The Digital Development Ministry withdrew the proposal after it sparked strong resistance, but it seems likely to be reintroduced. The Ministries of Digital Development, Finance, trade, and National Economy are currently reviewing the proposal and making revisions. The Digital Development Ministry noted the Eutelsat-OneWeb operator “meets national security requirements and provides communication services via non-geostationary satellites.”

Kazakh authorities are also in talks with Amazon Kuiper and Shanghai Spacecom Staellite Technology Co., both of which seem amendable to the idea of establishing gateway stations in Kazakhstan, though neither can provide all the services of Inmarsat, Thuraya, Iridium, or Starlink.

Kazakhstan’s National Security Committee (KNB) says devices with control centers outside Kazakhstan pose a potential threat to data security of citizens and state bodies. The KNB has reason to worry since in February 2024 it helped uncover a group of Chinese hackers who had access to Kazakhstan’s telecommunication operators, pension fund, Defense Ministry and more for two years.

The main point for Kazakhstan is that the government wants its people to be as knowledgeable as possible about computer technology and internet use so that the country can grow and compete globally. But the Kazakh government does not want citizens to use the internet to foment popular unrest or even spread information and narratives that run counter to the state’s policies.

USAID’s Retreat from Kazakhstan: Central Asia Braces for a New Power Struggle

The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has long been a key player in funding various projects in Kazakhstan and Central Asia, supporting both development initiatives and media organizations. However, under the new administration of U.S. President Donald Trump, the agency’s activities have been significantly curtailed. With USAID scaling back its operations, the question arises: Who will step in to fill the gap?

USAID’s Departure: A Near Total Withdrawal

While USAID is reducing its presence, it is not shutting down entirely. The Trump administration has announced plans to retain a mere 294 of the agency’s more than 10,000 employees worldwide, according to a BBC report. Following these drastic cuts, only twelve staff members will remain in USAID’s Africa bureau and eight in its Asia bureau.

USAID’s website states that nearly all of its employees will be furloughed, foreign aid programs have been suspended, and control over the agency has effectively shifted to the U.S. State Department. The agency’s annual budget previously exceeded $50 billion.

In Kazakhstan, USAID’s official website is now inaccessible. The platform contained key data, including lists of grant recipients – journalists, media professionals, and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) that received funding for various projects. While some USAID-backed initiatives supported modernization efforts, healthcare, and education, others were seen as promoting U.S. political interests.

According to available data, in 2024, USAID allocated $15.2 million to Kazakhstan, distributed as follows:

  • Healthcare – $8.8 million
  • Democracy, human rights, and governance – $3.7 million
  • Support programs – $1.39 million
  • Peace and security – $833,000
  • Economic development – $438,000
  • Humanitarian assistance – $23,000
  • Education and social services – $4,000

Despite these allocations, Kazakhstan does not rank among the top ten recipients of USAID funding.

The Trump administration has also disclosed additional details regarding U.S. foreign aid spending. White House Press Secretary Caroline Leavitt stated that under President Joe Biden, $4.5 million was allocated to combat disinformation in Kazakhstan. Leavitt criticized such expenditures, claiming that alongside Kazakhstan’s disinformation initiatives, U.S. taxpayers had also funded projects such as gender reassignment programs in Guatemala ($2 million), tourism promotion in Egypt ($6 million), a new Sesame Street show in Iraq ($20 million).

Reactions in Kazakhstan

Public opinion in Kazakhstan regarding USAID’s role is divided. Many officials and commentators have criticized what they perceive as foreign interference in the country’s internal affairs.

Mazhilis Deputy Magerram Magerramov has accused USAID of lobbying for the interests of the LGBT community, citing U.S. officials, including Elon Musk and Donald Trump, who have labeled USAID a “criminal organization.”

“Official White House statements claim that USAID has been unaccountable to U.S. taxpayers and has funneled huge sums into ‘absurd’ and ‘harmful’ projects. For example, between 2022 and 2025, USAID allocated $2 million to ‘strengthen human rights and equality’ in Central Asia. However, the program’s executor is the European International Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and Intersex Association. We need full transparency regarding which funds are allocated, by whom, for what purposes, and who benefits from them. This must end in Kazakhstan,” Magerramov stated.

The deputy argues that the rise of LGBT and feminist activism in Kazakhstan is not driven by internal societal demands, but rather by external financial support. Magerramov claims that USAID has financed various minority protests in the country.

Political scientist Gaziz Abishev emphasized the need to differentiate between humanitarian aid and political influence.

“I have no objections to states and international organizations funding charitable and developmental projects, such as support for people with disabilities, education, and science. However, politicized projects are a different matter. These initiatives often come wrapped in an appealing narrative but ultimately serve as instruments of foreign influence – and, at times, pressure,” Abishev wrote on social media. The political scientist warned that American taxpayers might be unknowingly funding questionable projects. Kazakhstan, he argues, must carefully scrutinize foreign investments.

Who Will Step In?

Despite USAID’s withdrawal, many believe U.S. influence in Central Asia will persist.

Political scientist Daniyar Ashimbayev views the agency’s restructuring as a temporary adjustment rather than a permanent retreat.

“American informational interference in other countries’ internal affairs will not end. What we are witnessing is a redistribution of influence and budgetary resources in Washington. First, USAID-funded networks actively opposed Trump and failed to realign in time. Second, Washington’s geopolitical interests have become entangled with ideological agendas that damage its global image. Third, any large bureaucracy with an uncontrolled budget eventually becomes inefficient. The current apparatus and its beneficiaries are being dismantled, but they will soon be replaced,” Ashimbayev stated.

Other analysts argue that Trump’s decision to scale back USAID hands a strategic advantage to the United States geopolitical rivals. Dosym Satpayev, director of the Risk Assessment Group, predicts that other powers will move to fill the void.

“China, which has been actively investing in educational programs in the region, will likely step in, funding certain segments of civil society in alignment with its interests. The European Union is unlikely to take a leading role due to its internal challenges and limited financial resources. Russia, given its increasing influence in Asia and the strategic importance of Central Asia, may partially fill the gap by investing in proxy organizations and soft power initiatives,” Satpayev explained.

Meanwhile, some nations are taking a different approach. In early February, Azerbaijan simultaneously banned both USAID and Rossotrudnichestvo, Russia’s state agency for international humanitarian cooperation. The Azerbaijani Foreign Ministry formally notified both Washington and Moscow of the decision.

Established in 2008 under the Russian presidency, Rossotrudnichestvo officially aims to “strengthen Russia’s humanitarian influence worldwide.” Azerbaijan’s move to expel both U.S. and Russian organizations underscores a growing trend among some nations to shield themselves from foreign influence altogether.

A Shifting Landscape

As USAID scales back its operations in Central Asia, the region faces a shifting geopolitical landscape. While some see the agency’s departure as a positive step toward national sovereignty, others warn that new players – whether China, Russia, or other global actors – will inevitably step in to exert influence. Whether Kazakhstan and its neighbors will embrace, resist, or regulate this evolving dynamic remains to be seen.

Are Registry Errors Behind Migrants’ Bank Account Freezes in Russia?

Dozens of migrants in Russia have complained that they were wrongfully included in the newly launched Register of Controlled Persons, leading to blocked bank accounts, detentions at the border, and job dismissals, according to human rights activist Valentina Chupik.

During the first two days of the registry’s operation, 31 people sought Chupik’s assistance: 13 were citizens of Kyrgyzstan, eight from Tajikistan, seven from Uzbekistan, and one each from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkmenistan. Among them were three holders of Russian residence permits and one with a temporary residence permit. All claim they were added to the list without justification.

The majority – 17 people – discovered their inclusion in the register through blocked bank accounts, with 12 of them clients of T-Bank. Four were notified by police following their detention, another four were denied entry at the Russian border, and one individual lost their job.

Interviews with those affected revealed no valid reasons for their inclusion in the registry, except for four cases where there might have been formal grounds for entry bans. However, none of these migrants had received prior notification. In addition, five had previously faced unlawful restrictions: three were expelled, one was stripped of a residence permit, and another was banned from entry – though all these decisions were later overturned.

Chupik advised migrants to withdraw their money from Russian banks immediately, warning that indiscriminate entries into the registry put their finances at risk. “Since they enter the register indiscriminately, I advise you to withdraw all your funds and send them home, leaving only the necessary minimum,” she said.

Baza, a Telegram channel linked to Russian law enforcement agencies, also reported the mass blocking of hundreds of foreign nationals’ accounts. Additionally, human rights activist Alexander Kim stated that refusals to provide state services, including migration registration, have become increasingly common.

The Register of Controlled Persons was launched in summer 2024 following the adoption of a law on the expulsion of foreign citizens. The move came amid an anti-migrant crackdown that intensified after the Crocus City Hall terrorist attack. Foreign nationals included in the register face deportation and lose the right to register businesses and property in Russia.

Switzerland to Return $182 Million in Confiscated Gulnara Karimova Assets to Uzbekistan

On February 6, in Tashkent, Uzbekistan’s Minister of Justice, Akbar Tashkulov, and Switzerland’s Ambassador to Uzbekistan, Konstantin Obolensky, signed an agreement on the repatriation of confiscated assets, the Uzbek Ministry of Justice reported.

Under the agreement, approximately $182 million will be returned to Uzbekistan. These funds were illegally obtained by certain Uzbek citizens and were fully confiscated in 2012 by the Swiss Prosecutor General’s Office as part of criminal proceedings against Gulnara Karimova, the eldest daughter of former President Islam Karimov. The money will be transferred through the United Nations Uzbekistan Vision 2030 Fund Multi-Partner Trust Fund.

This is not the first such agreement. In August 2022, Uzbekistan and Switzerland signed a similar agreement in Bern, outlining principles and mechanisms for returning illegally acquired assets. That agreement confirmed that the returned funds would be used for the benefit of Uzbekistan’s population through the UN trust fund.

Under the 2022 agreement, Uzbekistan was set to receive around $131 million. With this latest deal, the total amount of repatriated funds will now reach $313 million.

The Uzbekistan Vision 2030 Fund will allocate these funds to socially significant projects, particularly in healthcare and education.

British Company to Produce Flexible Concrete Material in Kyrgyzstan

The government of Kyrgyzstan and British company Concrete Canvas have signed an agreement to build a plant in Kyrgyzstan that will produce flexible concrete canvas, the government’s press service announced on February 6.

Concrete Canvas manufactures waterproof, flexible, concrete-filled geosynthetic composite mats, primarily used to line irrigation canals to prevent erosion and reduce seepage losses. The planned production capacity of the new plant is at least 5 million square meters of concrete canvas per year.

At the signing ceremony in Bishkek, Chairman of the Kyrgyz Cabinet of Ministers, Adylbek Kasymaliyev, highlighted the project as an example of an effective public-private partnership. He noted that five tons of this innovative material could replace 100 tons of cement in canal lining, significantly improving installation efficiency while delivering the same expected results.

The agreement follows negotiations in April 2024, when representatives of Concrete Canvas visited Kyrgyzstan to discuss the project. The talks involved Kyrgyz Deputy Chairman of the Cabinet of Ministers and Minister of Water Resources, Agriculture, and Processing Industry, Bakyt Torobayev, and the then British Foreign Secretary, David Cameron, who was on an official visit.

Torobayev underscored the importance of the material, stating, “Across Kyrgyzstan, the length of canals is 30,000 km, including 11,000 km of unsurfaced canals. By laying concrete material on these canals, we will avoid seepage of water and ensure its efficient use. Kyrgyzstan is an agricultural country with a lot of arable land, so we really need such materials.”

He also confirmed that the British company’s plant will be built in the Osh region, in southern Kyrgyzstan.

Kyrgyzstan to Export Agricultural Products to China

On February 6, in Beijing, Kyrgyzstan’s Deputy Chairman of the Cabinet of Ministers and Minister of Water Resources, Agriculture, and Processing Industry, Bakyt Torobayev, and China’s Head of the General Administration of Customs, Sun Meijun, signed protocols allowing the export of Kyrgyz agricultural products to China. The approved goods include beans, wool, cashmere, poultry meat, and offal.

Torobayev emphasized that these agreements represent an important step forward in strengthening trade and economic ties between Kyrgyzstan and China.

According to the Kyrgyz Ministry of Water Resources, Agriculture, and Processing Industry, trade turnover between the two countries nearly tripled from 2019 to 2023, reaching $5.433 billion – a 31.6% increase from 2022. In January-November 2024, bilateral trade continued to grow, rising by 6.9%.

The Kyrgyz minister expressed optimism about the early signing of additional export protocols for dried fruits, fresh fruits, vegetables, berries, raw cattle hides, and heat-treated meat. “We are confident that these goods will be in demand in the Chinese market,” he stated.

To facilitate trade, Torobayev proposed establishing a Chinese certification body’s representative office in Kyrgyzstan to simplify the certification process for Kyrgyz exports to China.

During his visit to Beijing, Torobayev also met with Jilin Teyan Biotechnology Co., Ltd., a Chinese manufacturer of veterinary vaccines, to discuss the supply of vaccines to Kyrgyzstan. The company expressed interest in building a vaccine production plant in Kyrgyzstan to manufacture treatments for cattle and poultry diseases.

These discussions took place as part of Kyrgyz President Sadyr Japarov’s state visit to China from February 4 to 7. During a meeting on February 5, Chinese President Xi Jinping reaffirmed China’s commitment to expanding economic, trade, and investment cooperation with Kyrgyzstan and expressed China’s willingness to import more high-quality agricultural products from the country.