• KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00212 0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10456 0.19%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28490 0%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00212 0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10456 0.19%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28490 0%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00212 0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10456 0.19%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28490 0%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00212 0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10456 0.19%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28490 0%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00212 0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10456 0.19%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28490 0%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00212 0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10456 0.19%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28490 0%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00212 0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10456 0.19%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28490 0%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00212 0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10456 0.19%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28490 0%

Kazakhstan to Train Workforce for Future Nuclear Power Plants

Kazakhstan’s first nuclear power plant (NPP) is expected to create permanent employment for approximately 2,000 people, with an additional 10,000 workers involved during its construction. This announcement was made by Energy Minister Almasadam Satkaliyev during a recent government meeting.

The country plans to commission its first NPP by 2035. A shortlist of potential builders includes four international companies: China’s CNNC, Russia’s Rosatom, South Korea’s KHNP, and France’s EDF. Authorities have also suggested the possibility of forming a consortium involving multiple countries to leverage diverse technological solutions. Alongside these efforts, Kazakhstan intends to independently train the specialists required for NPP operations.

Minister Satkaliyev highlighted plans to establish specialized training programs in domestic colleges to develop skills for roles such as dosimetrists, steam turbine equipment mechanics, nuclear power plant maintenance and repair specialists, and IT specialists for nuclear facilities. Practical training will be conducted at the National Nuclear Center and the Institute of Nuclear Physics.

“By 2030, the NPP construction project will create around 5,000 jobs, peaking at approximately 10,000 jobs in 2032. Once operational, the first plant will provide at least 2,000 permanent positions,” Satkaliyev stated.

As previously reported by The Times of Central Asia, Kazakhstan is accelerating the construction timeline for the NPP, located in the Almaty region, and plans to select a contractor in the first half of this year.

During the government meeting, which coincided with the “Year of Working Professions” initiative, Satkaliyev also addressed the broader labor demand in Kazakhstan’s energy sector. The industry is expected to require over 16,000 additional workers, including power engineers, welders, fitters, gas cutters, and electricians, by 2030. The country’s energy sector currently employs 303,000 people across 1,600 enterprises, with 99 new projects planned over the next five years.

To attract and retain talent, the Ministry of Energy aims to achieve an annual 15% wage increase for production personnel in energy-producing companies.

Meanwhile, Talgat Yergaliyev, Chairman of the Union of Builders of Kazakhstan (UBC), has called for simplifying the hiring process for foreign labor to address workforce shortages in Kazakhstan’s construction sector.

Kazakhstan Could Save America’s Energy Future

The energy crisis gripping Europe has made clear for all to see the limits of solar and wind power. Years of investment and unbridled ambition have not created renewable sources that can deliver the consistent, large-scale energy that modern economies need. Nuclear power has emerged as the only viable solution for achieving zero-emissions energy while maintaining reliability.

Europe’s urgent need to reduce its dependency on Russian gas has made all that even clearer. Meanwhile, the United States faces its own energy challenges. Its nuclear industry urgently requires a secure and stable uranium supply; yet U.S. foreign policy has largely overlooked Kazakhstan, the world’s largest uranium producer.

It gets worse. No sitting U.S. president has ever visited Kazakhstan, which produces over 40% of the world’s natural uranium. Russia and China have filled this diplomatic vacuum, embedding themselves deeply in Kazakhstan’s energy sector. The United States and Europe must act decisively to build stronger ties with Kazakhstan and Central Asia, if they are to achieve energy independence by securing their nuclear futures.

Europe’s dependence on Russian natural gas has been its geopolitical Achilles’ heel for decades. Russia’s illegal war of aggression against Ukraine, driving home the need to diversify energy sources, has further increased that vulnerability. Nuclear power offers Europe a path to energy independence. This hinges, however, on access to uranium, of which Europe imports 97% of its supply. Moreover, much of that uranium is enriched in Russia, creating a dependency analogous to that on Russian gas.

That problem can be solved by deepening cooperation with Kazakhstan, the world’s largest uranium producer. Unfortunately, Europe’s engagement with Kazakhstan has been half-hearted at best; yet the country’s reserves are essential for powering Europe’s nuclear plants. Strategic investments and partnerships are needed to unlock Kazakhstan’s role as a reliable uranium supplier to Europe, but logistical hurdles and a lack of political focus have so far stymied efforts to make that happen.

Kazakhstan, the world’s leading uranium producer, offers the United States a critical opportunity to secure its energy and national-security needs, yet Washington has ignored this and made little effort to deepen its ties with Kazakhstan. By contrast, China sources 60% of its uranium imports from Kazakhstan, supported by investments in mining and nuclear fuel facilities.

Likewise, Russia has, through Rosatom, forged strong partnerships with Kazatomprom. These efforts give Beijing and Moscow significant leverage over global uranium markets. The U.S., however, has failed to foster the political and economic relationships necessary for long-term nuclear-energy security. Kazakhstan is a particularly glaring case in point.

Over the past two decades, Kazakhstan has come to account for nearly half of global uranium production, giving it a key position in the global uranium supply chain. Neighboring Uzbekistan, the fifth-largest producer, adds another 6%, and Mongolia also has significant undeveloped reserves of future potential.

Yet Kazakhstan remains heavily dependent on Russian infrastructure for uranium transport and enrichment. Until the late 2024 signature of an agreement to supply nearly half of its annual uranium ore production to China through the rest of the decade, roughly 90% of its uranium exports have passed through Russian-controlled routes.

However, further diversification efforts are needed, for example, through the Middle Corridor to Western markets. To make this happen, Western nations must invest in infrastructure while supporting local enrichment and fuel fabrication capabilities. The United States and Europe can secure their own energy futures by helping Kazakhstan to reduce its reliance on Russia and China.

France’s approach illustrates the importance of high-level political engagement in securing critical resources. The French energy company Orano has significant stakes in the country’s uranium mines, and recent reciprocal diplomatic visits involving French President Emmanuel Macron have strengthened ties between the two nations. France has shown what Western engagement and follow-through with Kazakhstan can achieve.

The United States and Europe should emulate this behavior. Cooperative initiatives to develop transport routes, expand processing capabilities, and foster regional cooperation would benefit everyone. The Southern Gas Corridor, which successfully brought Azerbaijani gas to Europe, offers a model for integrating Central Asia’s resources into Western energy markets.

The United States should adopt a comprehensive strategy, focused on Central Asia, to secure its energy future. This strategy would have three main points: strategic diplomacy, infrastructure development, and capacity building in the nuclear sector. High-level diplomatic engagement, such as a presidential visit to Kazakhstan, would send a clear signal of America’s commitment to the region. Properly prepared, it would foster long-term partnerships while countering Russian and Chinese influence.

Complementing this effort, public-private partnerships would encourage American companies to invest in Kazakhstan’s energy sector while creating mutually beneficial economic opportunities. At the same time, the U.S. must support the development of critical infrastructure to diversify Kazakhstan’s transport routes and reduce its dependence on Russian-controlled logistics. Projects like the Trans-Caspian International Transport Route (TITR, also called the Middle Corridor) are vital for ensuring reliable large-scale access from the region to global markets. Coupled with initiatives to integrate Central Asian energy markets and power grids, these efforts would enhance regional stability and foster stronger intra-regional cooperation.

Finally, the United States should assist Kazakhstan in building local capacity for uranium enrichment and nuclear fuel fabrication. By supporting Kazakhstan’s ascent up through the nuclear value-chain, the U.S. can help the country achieve greater self-sufficiency while securing a stable uranium supply for its own reactors. These various measures, taken together, would position the United States as a key partner in Central Asia, advancing both its energy security and strategic influence in the region.

It is vital for Europe and the United States to recognize that Kazakhstan and its neighbors are not merely suppliers of resources but, indeed, strategic partners in energy policy. They share a vital interest in securing access to Kazakhstan’s uranium resources. By working together to build infrastructure and expand processing capabilities there, they can help foster political stability and a more resilient and diversified nuclear-energy supply chain. This way, Europe can reduce its dependency on Russian-enriched uranium, while the United States would be able to reinvigorate its nuclear industry while countering Chinese and Russian dominance.

Uzbekistan Ranked Second in Global Gold Purchases in November 2024

The Central Bank of Uzbekistan significantly increased its gold reserves in November, marking its first gold purchase since July 2024, according to Spot and data from the World Gold Council (WGC).

Global central banks collectively made net gold purchases of 53 tonnes in November, continuing the strong buying trend observed throughout 2024. The WGC noted that the decline in gold prices, partly influenced by the U.S. presidential elections, may have further encouraged gold accumulation by regulators.

Leading the list of gold buyers was the National Bank of Poland, which added 21 tonnes to its reserves, bringing its total to 448 tonnes. Poland also emerged as the largest buyer of precious metals in 2024, purchasing 90 tonnes over the year.

The Central Bank of Uzbekistan ranked second globally in November, purchasing 9 tonnes of gold. This marked its first increase in gold reserves since the summer and brought its annual net gold purchases to 11 tonnes. As of the end of November, Uzbekistan’s total gold reserves stood at 382 tonnes.

The Reserve Bank of India ranked third with 8 tonnes purchased in November and 73 tonnes accumulated throughout the year. Other notable buyers included Kazakhstan and China (5 tonnes each), Jordan (4 tonnes), Turkey (3 tonnes), the Czech Republic (2 tonnes), and Ghana (1 tonne). Singapore was the largest seller of gold during the month, offloading 5 tonnes.

As previously reported by The Times of Central Asia, Uzbekistan’s international reserves experienced a decline in November. The Central Bank of Uzbekistan reported a $1.7 billion drop, or approximately 3.9%, reducing total reserves to $41.5 billion as of December 1.

Kazakhstan’s High-Stakes Balancing Act in the Aktau Crash Investigation

The Aktau crash of the Azerbaijan Airlines Embraer 190 aircraft, which killed 38 people on 25 December, was a tragic event with significant international repercussions. This devastating accident not only claimed lives but also raised critical questions about aviation safety and the handling of sensitive investigations.

As investigators sought to determine its cause, Kazakhstan faced an important decision regarding the handling of the flight recorder. Ultimately, the country chose to transfer the recorder to Brazil, the manufacturer of the aircraft, rather than to the Interstate Aviation Committee (IAC) of the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS), as Russia had proposed.

This decision reflected both technical and diplomatic considerations, marking a crucial moment in the unfolding investigation. By taking this decision, Kazakhstan adhered to established industry procedures for aviation safety investigations. Such a step highlights the country’s commitment to transparency and global norms in aviation.

The move is typical of the country’s foreign policy under President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev, whose long diplomatic experience leads him to emphasize a rules-based approach over political considerations and to act in accord with established procedural norms. This choice ensured that the investigation would follow established international practices, thereby lending credibility to the process and reassuring global aviation stakeholders.

This behavior is also in line with Kazakhstan’s broader commitment to international law and a rules-based global order. Another notable example of this approach was its endorsement of the principles of sovereignty and territorial integrity through its refusal to recognize Russia’s annexation of Crimea or the independence of the Donbas regions. These decisions were not necessarily easy ones, given Kazakhstan’s economic and security ties with Russia, but they reinforced its commitment to global standards.

While some observers might frame decisions like the Aktau recorder transfer as a “snub” to Russia, such characterizations would miss the point. Like Kazakhstan’s refusal to recognize Donbas as independent and its efforts to prevent the flow of military components in violation of Western sanctions, its actions are not meant to be about rejecting one partner in favor of another. Rather, acting in its own autonomous interests, Kazakhstan seeks to “do the right thing,” because this maintains a consistent international profile with a steady foreign-policy course grounded in international law and practice.

Kazakhstan’s mediation efforts extend beyond formal multilateral forums, showcasing its active engagement in regional and global diplomacy. The country provided a neutral platform for discussions between opposing factions in the conflict over Syria; and it has also worked to ease tensions between Armenia and Azerbaijan, hosting purely bilateral consultations and thus demonstrating its capacity to engage constructively in regional conflicts without taking sides.

These efforts are in line with Kazakhstan’s larger foreign-policy strategy to act as a principled and impartial intermediary on the global stage, fostering dialogue and reducing hostilities. Similarly, Kazakhstan’s leadership in the Conference on Interaction and Confidence-Building Measures in Asia (CICA) reflects its dedication to multilateralism and peaceful conflict resolution.

Kazakhstan exemplifies the rising middle-power archetype also through its significant contributions to global nuclear non-proliferation. Its foreign policy operates on a multi-vector approach, managing relationships with global powers like Russia, China, and the West while mitigating over-reliance on any single actor.

A middle power is defined by its ability to exert substantial regional influence while contributing to global diplomacy through a combination of economic strength, strategic partnerships, and soft power. These states often act as mediators and bridge-builders in global conflicts, leveraging multilateral frameworks to balance relationships among larger powers.

Kazakhstan’s participation in organizations such as the Shanghai Cooperation Organization and the Organization of Turkic States complements its strategic engagement with the European Union and the United States. These actions demonstrate its ability to maintain balanced and constructive relationships across divergent international arenas.

The country’s adherence to international norms is part of its attempt to maintain a geopolitical equilibrium in its own foreign relations. By positioning itself as a bridge between competing spheres of influence, Kazakhstan seeks to promote dialogue and cooperation without alienating any major power.

This can be a difficult balancing act, particularly for Kazakhstan, given the country’s sensitive yet central geographic location. The decision about the flight recorder in Aktau, therefore, is part of a broader strategy to maintain sovereignty, bolster international credibility, and reinforce its image as a nation committed to peace and procedural integrity.

Kazakhstan’s domestic reform agenda is equally critical to sustaining its middle-power status. Under President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev, the government has introduced sweeping political, economic, and social reforms aimed at modernizing governance, fostering transparency, and addressing corruption and inequality.

By enhancing the rule of law and promoting economic diversification, these initiatives seek to create a stable, competitive environment for growth. The successful implementation of these reforms is vital for Kazakhstan’s ability to maintain regional leadership and expand its international influence.

Kazakhstan’s response to the Aktau crash and its broader foreign and domestic policies testify to a deliberate and nuanced strategy to solidify its position as a middle power. The country shows a pragmatic commitment to balancing geopolitical pressures through prioritizing transparency, multilateralism, and adherence to international norms.

Kazakhstan Prepares for Flood Season by Releasing Water from Reservoirs

Kazakhstan’s Ministry of Water Resources and Irrigation (MWRI) has begun releasing water from key reservoirs across the country to prepare for the influx of meltwater expected during the spring thaw. This proactive measure follows the devastating floods of spring 2024, the worst in 80 years, which affected multiple regions and displaced over 120,000 people.

By pre-emptively releasing water from reservoirs, Kazakhstan hopes to mitigate the impact of the spring flood season. This preparation underscores the importance of coordinated water management to protect communities, agriculture, and infrastructure from the devastating effects of extreme weather events.

In early January, the MWRI held a meeting to discuss water management strategies for the upcoming flood season. Authorities have initiated controlled releases in reservoirs located in the west, east, north, and center of the country – regions hit hardest by last year’s flooding. These releases are designed to reduce water levels in preparation for spring meltwater.

  • Astana Reservoir: Between December 20, 2024, and January 3, 2025, 5.06 million cubic meters of water were released, lowering the reservoir to 83% of its total capacity. By April 1, its volume will be further reduced to 73% (300 million cubic meters).
  • Aktobe Reservoir: Currently holding 51 million cubic meters, this will be lowered to 47.32 million cubic meters by April.
  • Bitik Reservoir (West Kazakhstan): Discharging at 8.3 cubic meters per second, its volume has been reduced to 34.45 million cubic meters.
  • Bukhtarma Reservoir (East Kazakhstan): Now at 79% capacity, this will be reduced by another 8% by spring.
  • Yntymak Reservoir (Karaganda Region): Of its current 69 million cubic meters, only 39 million cubic meters will remain to accommodate floodwaters.
  • Kengir Reservoir (Ulytau Region): Reduced to 86% of capacity, it will be lowered by an additional 11%.
  • Upper Tobolsk Reservoir (Kostanay Region): Holding 585.4 million cubic meters, its volume will be reduced to 61% (499.37 million cubic meters) by April.

MWRI head Nurzhan Nurzhigitov emphasized the importance of strategic water management throughout the year. “In spring, it is critical not only to collect floodwaters in reservoirs but also to distribute them to lake systems, natural pastures, and meadows,” he said. Nurzhigitov urged regional authorities to plan for efficient water allocation, noting that during the previous irrigation period, farms received approximately 11 billion cubic meters of water. Efforts to restore and preserve both large and small reservoirs were also highlighted.

Last spring’s historic floods inundated regions in northern, western, eastern, and central Kazakhstan for nearly two months. Over 120,000 people were evacuated, with rescue efforts involving multiple government agencies, including the Ministries of Emergency Situations, Defense, and Internal Affairs, as well as local authorities and volunteers.

Despite extensive state aid, many citizens raised concerns about the allocation of resources, as previously reported by The Times of Central Asia.

Every Third Kazakhstani Works Informally or Hides Their Income

Approximately one-third of working Kazakhstanis are employed informally, lacking social guarantees, labor protections, and pensions. This is according to the research “Features of Labor Market and Employment in Kazakhstan” by Adam Research. The findings, analyzed by the Energyprom agency, shed light on the scope of informal employment in the country.

The survey revealed that 36.4% of respondents acknowledged working in the shadow economy. This figure is higher among men (37.6%) than women (34.9%). Informal employment is categorized into three main types:

  • Work without a labor contract: 16.6%
  • Shadow entrepreneurship: 13.6%
  • Part-time work without registration: 6.2%

Young people and retirees are disproportionately represented in these informal sectors.

The study, conducted via telephone survey of adults in all 17 regions of Kazakhstan, found that southern areas like the Turkestan and Almaty regions, along with Shymkent, had the highest rates of informal employment. Conversely, East Kazakhstan and Ulytau regions recorded the lowest rates.

Informal workers are often individuals with secondary education working outside their specialty. Their earnings vary widely:

  • Those without labor contracts typically earn up to 100,000 tenge ($190) per month.
  • Shadow entrepreneurs may earn over 600,000 tenge ($1,130).

Many struggle financially. Among respondents paid “in envelopes,” nearly 27% reported insufficient income for basic necessities.

The Bureau of National Statistics of Kazakhstan reported 1.2 million informally employed citizens in 2023. Of these:

  • 682,500 worked in legal enterprises without formal registration.
  • 473,200 were employed in the informal sector without patents or tax payments.

This group constitutes 12.8% of Kazakhstan’s total employed population.

Labor Minister Svetlana Zhakupova identified informal employment as the second most significant labor market challenge, after job scarcity. She highlighted discrepancies between official labor remuneration fund data and pension savings.

In 2023, the labor remuneration fund was valued at 38 trillion tenge, yet pension contributions accounted for only 20 trillion tenge. Additionally, labor remuneration makes up just 30% of Kazakhstan’s GDP, significantly lower than the OECD average of 50%. The largest discrepancies were observed in the trade, agriculture, and real estate sectors.