Recovering Assets: Kazakhstan’s Prosecutors Expand Network to Moldova, Bulgaria
Kazakh prosecutors who focus on reclaiming national assets are sharing ideas and experiences with counterparts from Moldova and Bulgaria, two eastern European countries where anti-corruption investigators have faced big challenges.
The Asset Recovery Committee of the Prosecutor General’s Office of Kazakhstan signed agreements in those nations in February, increasing the international collaboration that is essential to tracking down stolen wealth. Kazakhstan is building ties with foreign jurisdictions and institutions such as Interpol as it seeks to get back illegally acquired assets valued in the billions of dollars, much of it funneled out of the Central Asian country by powerful business and political figures over many years.
“Strengthening partnerships in asset recovery plays a crucial role in combating illicit enrichment and ensuring transparency and accountability in financial systems worldwide,” said the Kazakh committee, which held a ceremony with the National Anti-Corruption Center of Moldova in Chișinău, the Moldovan capital.
The Moldovan side discussed its national digital platforms, legal framework, and procedures for asset seizure, freezing, and management. The Kazakh side explained Kazakhstan’s asset recovery law and how recovered funds are being reinvested in social projects. Some money has been earmarked for facilities such as schools and medical facilities.
Kazakh prosecutors also signed a deal with the Commission for Illegal Asset Forfeiture of Bulgaria in Sofia, the Bulgarian capital, allowing for “active collaboration in the tracing, identification, seizure, and repatriation of assets,” the Kazakh asset recovery committee said.
Kazakhstan’s 2023 asset recovery law, described by the government as in line with “international standards,” has aided the country in successful efforts to repatriate some lost wealth. Partners such as the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime have encouraged Kazakhstan to be transparent about how the recovered funds are used as a way to build confidence among Kazakh citizens who are worried about corruption. There have also been concerns that the law could be used selectively, targeting some suspects and sparing others, but Kazakhstan’s international outreach has received high marks in many circles.
Bulgaria has made some progress against graft, but still has a lot of work ahead. In a report published last month, the Council of Europe’s anti-corruption body said Bulgaria had fully implemented seven of its 28 recommendations to prevent corruption and promote government integrity. Of the other 21 recommendations, 11 have been partly implemented and 10 have not been implemented.
Moldova´s chief anti-corruption prosecutor, Veronica Dragalin, announced her resignation last month because of a governing party bill that would merge her office with the office of organized crime prosecutors. Dragalin, who previously worked as a U.S. federal prosecutor, said the change would undermine national security and benefit people involved in crime.
Bulgaria is in the European Union; Moldova has applied for membership.
A 2024 index compiled by Transparency International ranks countries by perceived levels of public sector corruption – 0 is very corrupt and 100 is very clean. Kazakhstan scored 40, up one point since 2023; Bulgaria scored 43 points, down two points since 2023; and Moldova also scored 43, up one point since the previous year.
The index scores are based on at least three “data sources” drawn from 13 different corruption studies and collected by institutions including the World Bank and the World Economic Forum, according to Transparency International.
