• KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00192 -0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10876 0.55%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28490 0%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00192 -0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10876 0.55%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28490 0%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00192 -0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10876 0.55%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28490 0%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00192 -0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10876 0.55%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28490 0%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00192 -0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10876 0.55%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28490 0%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00192 -0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10876 0.55%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28490 0%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00192 -0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10876 0.55%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28490 0%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00192 -0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10876 0.55%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28490 0%
11 December 2025

Japan to Build Central Asia’s Largest Airport in Uzbekistan by 2028

Japan’s Sojitz Corporation is set to launch one of Central Asia’s most ambitious infrastructure projects: the construction of a new international airport in Tashkent. According to Express Asia, construction will begin in 2025 and is expected to be completed by 2028, with a total project cost estimated at $1 billion.

The airport will be developed through a public-private partnership (PPP) with Saudi Arabia’s Vision Invest. Japan’s investment is projected to reach several hundred million dollars. Once completed, the airport will have a capacity of up to 20 million passengers annually and support more than 40 take-offs and landings per hour, making it the largest aviation hub in Central Asia.

Sojitz brings experience in airport development from projects in Japan’s Kumamoto and Okinawa prefectures, as well as on the Pacific island of Palau. In Uzbekistan, its activities extend beyond aviation: in partnership with Turkey’s Rönesans International, the company is planning an 800-bed hospital in Samarkand, a 1 GW wind power plant, and a 1.6 GW thermal power plant.

Driven by consistent GDP growth of around 6% per year, Uzbekistan continues to attract Japanese investment, bolstered by favorable tax policies and a 15% corporate tax rate. The number of Japanese companies operating in the country has doubled over the past five years to 54. Among them, Toyota Tsusho, through Eurus Energy Holdings, is developing a 500 MW wind power project, while Marubeni is collaborating with UAE firms on a wastewater treatment facility.

In 2024, President Shavkat Mirziyoyev met with a Japanese delegation led by Tadashi Maeda, Chairman of the Japan Bank for International Cooperation (JBIC), and representatives of Sojitz. The parties agreed on a three-year cooperation program with JBIC and a strategic roadmap with Sojitz for future projects in high-tech sectors. JBIC currently supports over $3.7 billion in joint ventures across Uzbekistan’s petrochemical, textile, energy, and infrastructure sectors.

Sojitz also reaffirmed its commitment to expanding its footprint in the country, including its role in the Syrdarya II IPP project, one of Uzbekistan’s largest planned power generation facilities.

Opinion: Trump’s Tariff Policy Will Propel the Asian Century More Rapidly Than Ever Before

The concept of the Asian Century draws a parallel to the characterization of the 19th century as Britain’s Imperial Century and the 20th century as the American Century. The Asian Century refers to the anticipated dominance of Asian politics and culture in the 21st century, contingent upon the continuation of specific demographic and economic trends. A study by the Asian Development Bank indicated that by 2050, approximately three billion Asians — equating to 56.6% of the projected 5.3 billion total inhabitants of Asia — could attain living standards comparable to those in Europe today. Furthermore, this region is expected to contribute to over half of global output by the middle of this century.

It seems pertinent to explore further insights on this topic. China is home to approximately 1.4 billion people, while India’s population is expected to reach around 1.45 billion by mid-2025. The share of South-South trade, i.e., trade between emerging economies, is expected to rise significantly, increasing from 18% in 2013 to approximately 40% by 2030. This shift will bring these nations back to a trading prominence reminiscent of their historical dominance roughly 200 years ago. Such a trend underscores the changing dynamics of economic power and highlights the growing importance of these countries in the global marketplace.

It is interesting to note that China and India, together, accounted for approximately 50% of the worldwide GDP during the 19th century, according to economist Angus Maddison. However, predicting how these nations will integrate into the global economy proves challenging, as historical events like Germany’s reunification and the fall of the Iron Curtain provide inadequate comparisons for this process. Following those milestones in 1990, a significant number of individuals entered the global economy; yet, the scale of that influx pales in comparison to what is expected with the simultaneous rise of China and India.

Whether this development is welcomed or not, the future of the world is inextricably intertwined with the trajectories of these two nations, Russia, and the former communist countries, such as those in Central Asia, as well as Pacific countries.

It is widely acknowledged that Asia’s impressive economic performance over the three decades leading up to 2024, especially in comparison to the rest of the world, arguably presents the strongest case to date for the emergence of an Asian Century. While this disparity in economic achievement had been recognized for some time, specific individual setbacks — such as the 1997 Asian financial crisis — often overshadowed the broader trends and general trajectory.

However, by the early 21st century, it became increasingly clear that this superior economic performance was not only sustainable but also possessed a force and significance that could dramatically reshape the global distribution of power. Consequently, leadership in various critical domains — such as international diplomacy, military strength, technology, and soft power — may soon be assumed by one or more of Asia’s nation-states.

The Asia-Pacific Region is also a vast geographical area, from Vladivostok, Russia, in the North to Australia in the south, and from Middle and Central Asia in the West to Kiribati in the east. Overall, the Asia-Pacific is characterized by diverse landscapes, climates, societies, cultures, religions, and economies.

To grasp the concept of reciprocal tariffs, often referred to as the Trump Tariff, it is crucial to recognize that these tariffs have exacerbated the situation. We can explore the calculations behind the tariff rates (or Trump tariffs) aimed at addressing bilateral trade deficits, ideally reducing them to zero. While international trade models suggest that trade balances will naturally adjust over time, the reality is starkly different; the United States has faced persistent current account deficits for the last fifty years. Proponents of these tariffs argue that this ongoing trend suggests that the fundamental assumptions underlying these trade models may no longer hold as previously believed.

The reasons for the inability of trade balances to stabilize are complex and varied. Economic factors, both those related to tariffs and those unrelated to them, play a critical role in this issue. Experts highlight several regulatory challenges that American products face, including stringent environmental assessments, differing consumption tax rates, and the costs associated with compliance requirements. These challenges particularly affect the competitiveness of U.S. manufacturing when products are made in the USA due to high labor costs.

Additionally, issues such as exchange rate manipulation and currency undervaluation complicate the situation, making it less appealing for consumers to purchase American goods and contributing to imbalanced trade.

The consequences of these dynamics are significant, as shown by a marked shift in U.S. consumer demand. This shift has increasingly favored global markets over domestic products, leading to job losses. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), the United States experienced significant net job losses from 1979 to 2009, especially in the manufacturing sector, which lost millions of jobs due to the shift toward a service-oriented economy. This period encompassed the Great Recession (2007-2009), during which the unemployment rate peaked at 10% in October 2009. Manufacturing employment hit a peak of 19.6 million jobs in June 1979 but declined sharply by 2009.

Key industries, such as fabricated metals and machinery, experienced significant job losses between 1979 and 1990, while the computer and electrical products sector also faced steep declines after 2001. It is worth noting that initially, a two-stage tariff plan was proposed: a baseline 10% tariff on most imports, followed by “reciprocal” tariffs for partners with significant U.S. trade deficits. Later, steeper measures targeting China, India, and Brazil were announced. Analysts warn these actions may increase costs and won’t significantly restore factory jobs in the USA.

One must recognize the demographic realities and the shortage of a skilled workforce in the United States. Consequently, the country relies heavily on highly qualified immigrants who have made significant contributions to technological advancements and the growth of the US economy. While the current policy may yield short-term benefits, it poses serious long-term risks to the US economy, potentially leading to inflation, recession, and unemployment — all of which are already becoming evident.

Experts suggest that alternative approaches exist to addressing these issues, advocating for a restructuring of the US economy rather than pursuing strategies that focus solely on immediate gains. The implications of this situation could extend beyond the US, affecting the entire world.

The concept of the Asian Century is no longer just a theoretical discussion; it has transformed into a palpable reality. At the heart of this shift are the vast and dynamic marketplaces of China and India, which are quickly becoming central players in the global economy. The integration of abundant natural resources from Russia and Central Asia, paired with the technological advancements and skilled labor pools from India and China, creates a robust foundation for growth and innovation. Additionally, the influx of investments from multinational corporations worldwide significantly contributes to this evolution.

This convergence of resources, talent, and capital is poised to redefine global economic landscapes. However, it is essential to recognize that the production of military goods is not a sustainable answer for nations seeking progress. The historical ramifications of a militarized approach are profound, having led to the tragic loss of millions of lives and instigating widespread hunger and suffering.

This has done little to promote unity among countries, highlighting the pressing need for a more collaborative and peaceful path forward. This fundamental truth must be urgently acknowledged and addressed as we navigate the complexities of this new era.

 

The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the publication, its affiliates, Samarkand State University, or any other organizations mentioned.

Clashes on Afghan-Pakistani Border Hinder Central Asian Trade Hopes

A recent surge in border fighting between Pakistan and Afghanistan is a reminder that Central Asian prospects for developing trade and energy networks through both those countries rest on fragile hopes for long-term security in the region. 

Some of the worst clashes since the Taliban took power again in Afghanistan in 2021 appeared to have tapered off by Sunday. While both sides have professed their openness to dialogue, there was little sign of a sustained move to address grievances that have simmered for many years. 

On Sunday, Pakistan accused Afghanistan of “unwarranted aggression” and said it had repulsed attacks by the Afghan Taliban and other armed groups at the border, inflicting heavy losses. On Saturday night, Afghanistan’s Ministry of National Defense said its military had conducted a “successful retaliatory operation” against Pakistani security forces following Pakistani ground incursions and airstrikes on Afghan soil. 

The conflicting claims were difficult to verify. But the Afghan ministry said its military operation had ended, signaling that it did not intend to prolong this round of fighting. Pakistan, which closed border crossings, said it wanted good relations with its neighbor.

The clashes come as Central Asian countries seek to diversify trade routes, looking to Afghanistan as a path to ferry goods to Pakistani seaports and onward to the Indian Ocean. Such a route offers an alternative to more traditional corridors that were disrupted after Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in early 2022. 

But projects such as the Trans-Afghan railway, which is awaiting a feasibility study, depend on a stable political environment in a part of the world that is also prone to conflict. The TAPI natural gas pipeline project, which would connect Turkmenistan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and India, is also vulnerable to regional instability. 

Afghan Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi visited Pakistan’s chief rival, India, on October 9, just before the weekend escalation of border clashes.

EU Criticizes Tajikistan for Failing to Arrest Putin on ICC Warrant

The European Union says Tajikistan was obligated under international law to arrest Russian President Vladimir Putin during his visit to the Central Asian country for a regional summit this week.

“Tajikistan is a State Party to the Rome Statute of the ICC (International Criminal Court) and failed to comply with its obligations under the Statute to execute the arrest warrant,” the EU’s diplomatic service said in a statement on Thursday.

“Vladimir Putin is under an arrest warrant by the ICC for international crimes, specifically alleged crimes of unlawful deportation and unlawful transfer of children from temporarily occupied Ukrainian territories in the context of his illegal war of aggression against Ukraine,” the service said.

Russia rejects the authority of the court, which issued the warrant for Putin’s arrest in March 2023.

Tajikistan signed the Rome Statute, which established the International Criminal Court, in 1998. But it maintains close political, economic, and security ties with Russia. At a joint appearance with Putin in Dushanbe on Thursday, Tajik President Emomali Rahmon noted the “high level of relations between Tajikistan and Russia.”

Putin also met the leaders of Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan at the Russia-Central Asia summit.

Where Wings Grow: New Show at Aspan Gallery, Almaty

Let’s move Aspan Gallery from name to place, from reputation to reality. As one of the Kazakh galleries most visible on the fair circuit, known for its impeccable presentations and strong roster of Central Asian artists, visiting its headquarters in Almaty felt almost inevitable.

It didn’t disappoint. Tucked into the underground floor of a shopping complex in a leafy area of Almaty, where you might catch a glimpse of a stylish passerby balancing a matcha cup before descending the stairs, the gallery unfolds as a quiet enclave.

There, Where Wings Grow opens as a multifaceted meditation on the cycles of nature, and particularly on the steppe, explored by several Central Asian artists through ecological, historical, and mythic lenses. What emerges is not a nostalgic portrait of a nomadic past but a layered reflection on resilience and renewal.

At the center of the curatorial vision is Alan Medoev, the archaeologist whose 1960s expeditions uncovered hundreds of sites across the Kazakh steppe. His discoveries challenged Soviet portrayals of the region as an empty expanse and instead presented it as a cradle of memory. The exhibition extends that lineage, tracing how the steppe continues to act as an archive where cultural, personal, and ecological time intersect.

The installation is clean and deliberate: suspended collages, unframed paintings, and subtle shifts in light. Walking through, one feels the exhibition itself has been conceived as a kind of landscape.

Where Wings Grow, installation view; image: Theo Frost

The Interplay Between Distance and Proximity

This quality resonated strongly when encountering the works. At a distance, some pieces seemed almost naïve or casual in their painterly surfaces, but up close, their textures, materials, and embedded details revealed far more intricate worlds.

This is true of Saule Suleimenova’s Plasticographies (two works titled Zhana Omir – New Life and Steppe Romanticism). From afar, they appear to be simple, even sentimental landscapes. Up close, however, they are revealed as collages of discarded plastic: fragments of packaging, commercial logos, counterfeit brands, and old ID cards.

Suleimenova, who grew up in Almaty and trained as an architect before turning to socially engaged art, calls plastic “a treasure” and uses it to question both waste and memory. Within these luminous surfaces are startling details such as embryonic forms and small figures hidden in the texture. These unsettling images evoke new generations coming into a world shaped by waste, suggesting both renewal and ecological crisis.

Steppe Romanticism distills the landscape into minimal horizons and contemplative silence. Yet knowing it is made of plastic prevents forgetting the contradiction, serenity marked by civilization’s residue. It recalls how landscapes themselves operate, inviting from afar but, up close, layered with scars, residues, and histories.

Moldakul Narymbetov, “Untitled”; image: Aspan Gallery.

In a similar spirit, Moldakul Narymbetov’s paintings establish the exhibition’s tone. A founding member of the radical Kyzyl Tractor collective and one of the central figures in Kazakh contemporary art, Narymbetov (1948–2012) was known for fusing folklore, shamanic motifs, and gestural abstraction.

His brushstrokes, dense with fiery movement, make the earth appear both dying and alive. Köktem (Spring) celebrates rebirth through rough, instinctive brushwork that still feels deliberate. Another canvas, Untitled, with its violet and yellow hues, recalls Munch’s haunted skies, yet the subject is a quiet pasture, a landscape impossible to fully grasp. His work, born of the post-Soviet rediscovery of national identity, captures the vitality and volatility of a culture relearning to speak through color.

Resilience in the Face of Adversity

One of the most striking works on view is Ulan Djaparov’s three-minute video Zvezdopad (Falling Stars), created during the Lazy Art Residency. Djaparov, trained as an architect in Bishkek and long active as an artist, curator, and teacher, has always blurred the line between activism and poetics. The video shows children pulling adults into the water, an absurd yet graceful act that alludes to youth movements toppling monuments and to creativity born from collective courage. It is a quiet allegory of change, both generational and moral.

The theme of resilience continues in Bakhyt Bubikanova’s Qanat painting series. Bubikanova (1985–2023), a student of Narymbetov and a rising figure of Kazakhstan’s second avant-garde wave, worked across video, performance, and painting, exploring the paradoxes of modern life. In this series, landscapes are rendered inaccessible by a red fence, a blunt and urgent motif that slices across horizons. The works feel both political and deeply personal, a confrontation between nature and the grids of control. Their quiet unease resonates even more when one recalls that Bubikanova often addressed industrial expansion and environmental degradation.

The photographs by Rustam Khalfin, In Honor of the Rider (created with Zhanat Baimukhametov and Georgy Tryakin-Bukharov), provide one of the exhibition’s most memorable moments. Khalfin (1949–2008), often described as the father of Kazakh contemporary art, was trained in architecture in Moscow before returning to Almaty to teach and experiment with performance, video, and installation. In this piece, a nude man coated in clay sits astride a horse, his body merging with earth and animal. Behind him, a faint rural structure anchors the mythic scene in lived reality. Khalfin’s work, rooted in his lifelong interest in nomadic ontology, visualizes the interdependence of human, animal, and soil. The clay on the rider’s body feels less like a costume than a memory: human flesh as the earth’s own matter.

Askhat Akhmedyarov, “Nomad 4”; image: Aspan Gallery.

That theme of nomadism re-emerges in Askhat Akhmedyarov’s Nomad 4, one of the exhibition’s most urgent interventions. Akhmedyarov, born in western Kazakhstan in 1965 and associated with the Transavantgarde generation, often fuses surrealist imagery with social critique. Here, the traditional nomad is recast as a “new nomad,” displaced not by choice but by circumstance, hanging a painting of a landscape in the open landscape itself.

The work recalls recent evictions in Astana, where urban renewal has meant the demolition of old wooden districts and the relocation of thousands of residents. Many families have spoken publicly about being pressured to leave with inadequate compensation as their homes made way for redevelopment. In this light, Nomad 4 becomes a mirror of forced migration, an image of mobility as injustice. Akhmedyarov’s use of the nomad figure, once a symbol of freedom, now reveals the precarity behind the city’s polished surfaces.

Saodat Ismailova, “Arslanbob”; image: Aspan Gallery.

In a separate room, Saodat Ismailova’s three-channel video Aslanbob closes the exhibition with a lush, meditative reflection on the walnut forests of Kyrgyzstan. Ismailova, born in Tashkent in 1981 and now one of Central Asia’s most internationally recognized artists, works in film and installation to connect myth and environment. Drawing on the legend of a saint who nurtured a seed that grew into the vast forest, Aslanbob reflects on intergenerational responsibility.

What binds these diverse works is their shared reflection on landscape, not as picturesque scenery but as contested terrain. The title Where Wings Grow crystallizes the exhibition’s paradox: to grow wings, one must first be rooted. Yet in Kazakhstan today, both flight and roots are precarious. By turning to the land, these artists seek to reimagine a future where art, ecology, and identity remain intertwined.

Russia Seeks to Reassert Role at Central Asia Summit, but Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan Push Their Own Agendas

The second Central Asia-Russia summit, held ahead of the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) leaders’ meeting, reaffirmed the Kremlin’s continued intent to assert influence over the region. Russian President Vladimir Putin used the platform not only to signal discontent with the pace of economic integration but also to critique the Central Asian republics for what he portrayed as insufficient engagement in bilateral trade.

Despite growing ties between Central Asian states and external partners, exemplified by the “C5+1” dialogue format that includes major powers such as the U.S. and China, Putin made clear that Russia does not view its influence in the region as diminished.

Opening the summit, Putin took a veiled swipe at the “C5+1” initiative, which has gained traction in recent years. “I am in constant contact with each of the Central Asian presidents,” he said, before adding, “But I am sure that this multilateral format of communication is also very useful and has its obvious ‘added value’, so to speak.”

By “added value,” the Russian leader appeared to suggest that multilateral engagement enables Central Asian states to present a more unified front in foreign negotiations, an approach that complicates Moscow’s ability to exert influence through bilateral channels.

Putin also expressed dissatisfaction with the current levels of mutual trade and Russian investment in the region. While acknowledging that trade between Russia and Central Asia had surpassed $45 billion, he pointedly compared this figure to trade with Belarus, which exceeds $50 billion despite its far smaller population.

“Our trade turnover with Belarus exceeds $50 billion. Let me remind you that Belarus has a population of 10 million. Uzbekistan already has nearly 40 million, Tajikistan over 10 million, and Kazakhstan more than 20 million. Can you imagine what a colossal resource this is?” Putin said. “This means there are strong prospects for expanding our economic relations.”

Putin described Russia’s current $20 billion in regional investments as inadequate and called for increased engagement, but also tempered expectations surrounding major infrastructure and logistics projects championed by Astana and Tashkent, while positioning Russia as a central player in their development. He proposed integrating existing North-South and East-West corridors into a unified Eurasian logistics network supported by digital and transport services.

“This will allow us to significantly increase international transport volumes through our common region,” Putin said.

Kazakh President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev responded directly, updating figures presented by Putin and reaffirming Kazakhstan’s commitment to regional integration. He noted that Russia’s total trade with Central Asia exceeded $50 billion in 2024, with $28 billion in trade between Russia and Kazakhstan alone.

Tokayev emphasized the strategic importance of transport cooperation with Russia, stating that “Russia is a key gateway for the region’s countries to global markets. Therefore, cooperation in the transport and logistics sector is a matter of heightened strategic importance.”

Image: Akorda.kz

Tokayev outlined Kazakhstan’s existing transport infrastructure, eleven international corridors, including five rail and six road routes, that carry about 85% of land freight between Asia and Europe. Over 15 years, Kazakhstan has invested more than $35 billion in the sector. As a result, rail transit from Russia to Central Asia via Kazakhstan has risen 26% over three years, with traffic in the opposite direction growing by nearly 50%. Deliveries from Russia to China via Kazakhstan have tripled, exceeding five million tons.

He proposed launching a joint Kazakh-Russian investment and infrastructure program for the eastern segment of the North-South corridor, with potential participation from international financial institutions. He also proposed forming a “Council for the Development of the Eurasian Route,” led by the heads of transport agencies, to coordinate initiatives and address logistical challenges.

Uzbek President Shavkat Mirziyoyev also offered proposals, suggesting the creation of a Coordination Council at a deputy prime ministerial level to accelerate joint development projects. He further proposed establishing a unified transport and logistics network to integrate national programs in road, rail, and air transport. Mirziyoyev emphasized that closer coordination would help remove bottlenecks, speed up the implementation of regional agreements, and make Central Asia more competitive in global trade.

Kyrgyz President Sadyr Japarov highlighted improved regional security since the first summit and reaffirmed Russia as a “key trade and economic partner.” He urged the removal of trade and transit barriers and backed faster progress on transport links connecting Russia with China and Iran. Japarov also pointed to Kyrgyzstan’s hydropower and renewable projects as opportunities for joint investment. Tajik President Emomali Rahmon, hosting the summit, stressed cooperation on trade and connectivity, while Turkmenistan’s President Serdar Berdimuhamedov emphasized his country’s engagement but did not announce major new initiatives.

The Dushanbe summit highlighted both Moscow’s determination to remain a central partner for Central Asia and the region’s effort to diversify its external ties. Putin’s calls for deeper trade and investment underscored Russia’s intent to anchor its influence, while Tokayev and Mirziyoyev’s proposals reflected Central Asian leaders’ own ambitions to shape connectivity and development on their terms. Although Russia still plays a pivotal role in trade and infrastructure, the parallel growth of formats such as C5+1 and expanding ties with China, the EU, and others suggest that Central Asian states are increasingly seeking a balance – leveraging Russian partnership without relying on it exclusively.