• KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00213 0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10699 0%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28571 0%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00213 0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10699 0%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28571 0%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00213 0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10699 0%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28571 0%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00213 0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10699 0%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28571 0%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00213 0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10699 0%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28571 0%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00213 0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10699 0%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28571 0%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00213 0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10699 0%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28571 0%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00213 0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10699 0%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28571 0%

Uzbekistan National Deported From Russia Over Public Prayer

A court in St. Petersburg has fined a citizen of Uzbekistan and ordered his deportation from Russia after finding him guilty of illegal missionary activity for leading prayers in a public place, according to Russian judicial authorities.

The case was announced by Darya Lebedeva, head of the joint press service of the courts of St. Petersburg, who said the Primorsky District Court found the man guilty of violating Russian legislation governing freedom of conscience, religion, and religious associations.

According to the court statement, the incident took place on May 12 at approximately 7:45 p.m. near Savushkina Street in St. Petersburg. Police officers reportedly discovered the Uzbek citizen, identified by Russian authorities as Dadaboev, conducting a Muslim prayer ritual in a public area.

Authorities alleged that he acted “as an imam” without official authorization to conduct religious ceremonies and had not coordinated the event with local executive or municipal authorities, as required under Russian law.

Because he is a foreign citizen, the court classified the case under Part 5 of Article 5.26 of Russia’s administrative code, which concerns missionary activity carried out in violation of legal requirements.

In court, the defendant reportedly acknowledged the facts outlined in the police protocol and admitted he had not known his actions could violate Russian law.

“The objective side of the offense consists of publicly disseminating information about one’s religious beliefs among persons who are not participants in the given religious association, with the purpose of involving them in the religious association, carried out on the territory of the Russian Federation in violation of the requirements established by law,” the court said in its statement.

The court imposed a fine of 30,000 rubles (approximately $400) and ordered his deportation from Russia.

The incident comes amid increasing pressure on migrant communities in Russia following the country’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine. Migrants from Central Asia have reported more frequent police raids, document inspections, detentions, and deportation threats in recent years, while Russian authorities have tightened migration and residency regulations.

The Times of Central Asia previously reported on several incidents involving Central Asian migrants in Russia, including footage that appeared to show a Tajik schoolgirl being beaten by Russian classmates while a teacher looked on, as well as an attack on a Kyrgyz woman in Moscow by a man shouting anti-migrant insults and calling migrants “terrorists.”

Kyrgyzstan Seeks Foreign Teachers to Ease Education Staff Shortage

A group of deputies in Kyrgyzstan’s Jogorku Kenesh, the national parliament, has drafted legislative amendments aimed at attracting foreign teachers and modernizing the country’s educational infrastructure through new legal and economic incentives.

The proposed amendments were submitted for parliamentary consideration.

Under the draft legislation, foreign teachers working in Kyrgyzstan would be exempt from income tax and mandatory social security payments. The bill would also grant foreign educators the right to obtain temporary residence permits.

Additional measures include tax incentives for educational institutions and exemptions from value-added tax (VAT) on imported educational equipment.

The authors of the amendments argue that modernizing Kyrgyzstan’s education system will require the introduction of international teaching standards, digital technologies, and updated educational programs. They say the process will also require the involvement of highly qualified specialists, including foreign teachers with international experience.

According to the lawmakers, the proposed legislation is intended to help implement advanced teaching methods and global educational practices, improve student training, create a more competitive academic environment, and strengthen the intellectual potential of younger generations without requiring students to study abroad.

The bill’s explanatory note states that a shortage of qualified teachers in schools and universities remains one of the key challenges facing Kyrgyzstan’s education system.

The shortage comes as the country experiences a steady increase in student numbers and mounting pressure on educational infrastructure.

According to official figures cited in the draft legislation, Kyrgyzstan had 2,175 public schools and 219 private schools in 2025, serving a total of 1,526,800 students with 108,006 teaching staff.

The country also has 32 public universities and 41 private universities.

Erdoğan Visit Puts Trade, Transit, and Turkic Economic Integration at Center of Kazakhstan’s OTS Push

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan’s visit to Kazakhstan comes as Astana is trying to give the Organization of Turkic States a more practical economic role, linking trade, investment, transport, digital development, and business financing across the Turkic world.

The visit centered on three connected events: Erdoğan’s official visit to Astana, the sixth meeting of the Kazakhstan-Turkey High-Level Strategic Cooperation Council, and the informal summit of the Organization of Turkic States in Turkistan. Erdoğan arrived in Astana ahead of talks with President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev, while Turkish media reported that the agenda included transport links through the Middle Corridor, Caspian transit routes, energy security, logistics, defense industry cooperation, trade and investment.

The visit also carried strong symbolic staging. According to Akorda, Erdoğan’s aircraft was escorted by Kazakh Air Defense fighter jets after entering Kazakhstan’s airspace. At Astana airport, he was greeted by an honor guard, children waving the flags of Kazakhstan and Turkey, and military helicopters displaying the national symbols of both countries. Erdoğan later said the welcome had brought his delegation “enormous joy,” adding, “We certainly will not forget this.”

Kazakh aircraft fly over Astana during the ceremonial welcome for Erdoğan. Image: Akorda

The OTS summit is being hosted by Kazakhstan on May 15 in Turkistan under the theme “Artificial Intelligence and Digital Development.” According to the organization, the summit is intended to advance cooperation on artificial intelligence, digital innovation, emerging technologies, public services, sustainable economic growth, and regional connectivity.

The digital theme reflects Kazakhstan’s effort to give the OTS a more practical economic role, beyond its cultural and diplomatic foundations. Ahead of the summit, Astana hosted a business forum on May 13 under the title “Economic Integration and Cooperation of the OTS Countries: New Opportunities in Industry, Agro-Industrial Complex, Logistics and Digitalization.” Kazakhstan’s prime minister’s office said the forum brought together state bodies, financial institutions, chambers of commerce, international organizations, and business representatives from OTS countries.

Kanat Sharlapayev, chairman of the Union of Chambers of Commerce and Industry of Turkic States and of the presidium of Kazakhstan’s Atameken National Chamber of Entrepreneurs, urged Turkic countries to move toward deeper industrial and digital integration. He said the task was to create a unified digital environment, reduce the distance between producers and consumers, increase transparency, and speed up transactions.

The forum also discussed plans for joint industrial facilities and manufacturing zones along transport corridors, an idea that would push OTS cooperation beyond transit toward processing and value-added production.

Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of National Economy Serik Zhumangarin used the forum to frame OTS cooperation as one of Kazakhstan’s foreign economic priorities. He said the OTS countries form a market of more than 170 million people and have significant industrial, transport, agricultural, and human potential. He also said the main task was to move from declarations to joint projects, new production, technology alliances, and mutual investment.

Silk Way TV reported that Murat Karimsakov, chairman of the Kazakh Chamber of International Commerce, said trade turnover among OTS countries increased by more than 36% in 2025, while direct investment from Turkic states into Kazakhstan reached nearly half a billion dollars. Karimsakov also said Turkish investment in Kazakhstan had exceeded $6 billion over the past 20 years.

The trade target remains ambitious. At the council meeting in Astana, Erdoğan said Kazakhstan and Turkey had reaffirmed their goal of raising bilateral trade turnover to $15 billion. He also emphasized the importance of implementing the action plan adopted at the 14th meeting of the Joint Economic Cooperation Commission, held in Astana on April 15. The April commission meeting had already pointed to the practical areas behind the new trade push. The Times of Central Asia previously reported that Kazakhstan was seeking to expand agricultural exports to Turkey, with the two sides discussing trade in grain, oilseeds, livestock products, sugar, confectionery, and processed foods.

Tokayev placed the investment relationship in similar terms, stating that Turkish investment in Kazakhstan had reached $6 billion, while Kazakh investment in Turkey had approached $2.5 billion. He also described Turkey as one of Kazakhstan’s top five trading partners and said the two countries would sign a Declaration on Eternal Friendship and Expanded Strategic Partnership.

The business forum gave that political language a more practical layer. Kazakhstan’s Atameken National Chamber of Entrepreneurs signed an agreement with the Turkic Investment Fund aimed at expanding investment cooperation and supporting joint projects. A separate memorandum was signed between the Union of Chambers of Commerce and Industry of Turkic States, Kazakhstan’s Foreign Trade Chamber, and the National Association of Cooperatives and Other Economic Communities.

The Turkic Investment Fund is central to that effort. Kazakhstan views the fund as one of the main financial mechanisms for supporting joint OTS projects. Zhumangarin said the fund was ready to allocate at least $20 million at the initial stage for co-financing projects, and that talks were underway on possible participation in financing infrastructure development at Almaty International Airport.

For Kazakhstan, the OTS connects bilateral ties with Turkey to a wider regional corridor. The organization’s members are Turkey, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Uzbekistan. Its observer states are Hungary, Turkmenistan, and the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus, while the Economic Cooperation Organization has observer organization status.

This gives the OTS a geographic logic that is increasingly economic as well as cultural and political. It links Central Asia with Azerbaijan and Turkey across the Caspian, overlapping with Kazakhstan’s long-running effort to expand the Trans-Caspian International Transport Route, often called the Middle Corridor. Azerbaijan is the pivotal Caspian link in Kazakhstan’s westward corridor to the South Caucasus and Europe, with Astana also pursuing Caspian fiber-optic and power-cable projects alongside transport cooperation.

Zhumangarin separately highlighted the importance of sustainable transport routes, including the modernization of rail and port infrastructure to expand transit and trade between East and West.

Transport and logistics remain the key test. Kazakhstan wants more reliable export and transit options across the Caspian, while Turkey wants to strengthen its role as the western gateway for goods moving between Central Asia, the Caucasus, and Europe. The business forum’s focus on logistics shows the OTS economic agenda is now being tied directly to corridor development rather than solely to identity politics or diplomatic language.

Energy is part of the same corridor question, with energy security expected to feature prominently in the discussions. Any increase in Caspian-linked exports depends not only on political will, but also on port capacity, rail connections, pipeline standards, financing, and predictable customs procedures.

The visit also carries a cultural and humanitarian layer. Qazinform, citing Akorda, reported that Kazakhstan has built a school named after Khoja Ahmed Yassawi in Turkey’s Gaziantep province, which was affected by the 2023 earthquake. The two sides also agreed to open Maarif Foundation schools in Astana and Almaty. Around 14,000 Kazakh students are currently studying in Turkey, while about 260 Turkish students are studying in Kazakhstan.

Tokayev also said the newly established Khoja Ahmed Yassawi Order would be awarded to Erdoğan in recognition of his contribution to strengthening bilateral cooperation. The award reinforces the symbolic side of the visit, particularly because the OTS summit is being held in Turkistan, a city closely associated with Yassawi’s legacy.

Ceremonial welcome for Erdoğan in Astana. Image: Akorda

The symbolism of the visit carries weight, but the larger question is whether the organization can turn shared identity into a working economic infrastructure. For Kazakhstan and Turkey, that means fewer declarations and more usable routes, financing tools, customs links, and projects that businesses can actually rely on.

Erdoğan’s visit does not settle that question, but it shows where Astana wants the OTS to go. The organization is being framed less as a cultural club and more as a platform for trade, transit, investment, and digital cooperation. Whether that platform can deliver will depend on what follows after the summit: signed projects, funded corridors, and simpler movement of goods across the Caspian.

Tajikistan Receives Nearly $1.9 Million in U.S. Medical Equipment

Tajikistan has received nearly $1.9 million worth of medical equipment under a healthcare cooperation program with the United States, with the main focus on improving emergency care, supporting maternity hospitals, and reducing infant mortality.

According to Tajikistan’s Ministry of Health, the equipment was delivered as part of the Global Health Supply Chain Program – Procurement and Supply Management (GHSC-PSM). The total value of the shipment exceeded $1.87 million.

The handover ceremony took place in Dushanbe and was attended by First Deputy Minister of Health and Social Protection Salomuddin Yusufi and Carson Relitz Rocker, the acting head of the U.S. Embassy in Tajikistan.

Officials said particular emphasis would be placed on equipping healthcare facilities with oxygen delivery systems and neonatal resuscitation equipment. Authorities expect the new supplies to improve the quality of emergency medical care and reduce health risks for mothers and infants.

Part of the equipment has already been installed in five maternity hospitals and 11 additional medical facilities across the country.

Representatives of the Health Ministry said the new equipment is especially important for intensive care and resuscitation units, where timely oxygen delivery and specialized care directly affect patient survival rates.

They described the transfer as another example of long-term U.S. support for Tajikistan’s healthcare system.

According to Yusufi, medical cooperation between the U.S. and Tajikistan has continued for many years and spans a wide range of areas, including equipment supplies, efforts to combat infectious diseases, sanitary and epidemiological safety, healthcare infrastructure modernization, and the training of medical personnel.

Authorities in Tajikistan also expressed hope for further expansion of cooperation following the signing of a new memorandum of understanding between the country’s Ministry of Health and Social Protection and the U.S. Embassy in Tajikistan.

Opinion: The Southern Dimension of the Middle Corridor – Afghanistan’s Role in Eurasia’s New Logistics Landscape

Afghanistan’s integration into the Trans-Caspian International Transport Route (TITR) is extending beyond local logistics and evolving into one of Eurasia’s key geo-economic projects. Amid the global transformation of supply chains, Central Asia has an opportunity to move beyond its role as a transit periphery and become an active participant in shaping new economic corridors, creating a full-fledged “southern dimension” of Eurasian connectivity.

Two Routes: Strategic and Operational

Two main directions for Afghanistan’s integration into the Eurasian transport system are currently under discussion, each reflecting a distinct development logic: strategic and pragmatic.

The “Eastern Branch” (Termez-Mazar-i-Sharif-Kabul-Peshawar) is traditionally viewed as the primary trans-Afghan route. Its key advantage is direct access to the ports of Karachi and Gwadar, providing the shortest connection between Central Asia and the Indian Ocean.

At the same time, geography makes the project highly complex. The route passes through the central and eastern regions of Afghanistan, including the Hindu Kush mountain range, where long tunnels and bridges would be required. This would sharply increase construction and maintenance costs, extend implementation timelines, and heighten security and infrastructure risks.

According to available estimates, the project could cost around $5 billion and handle 15-20 million tons of cargo annually. However, the lengthy investment cycle and dependence on political stability mean implementation remains a long-term prospect.

The “Western Branch” (Turgundi-Herat-Kandahar-Spin Boldak) represents an alternative logistics corridor based on more favorable geography.

Western Afghanistan is characterized by predominantly flat, semi-arid terrain, reducing the need for complex engineering structures and allowing the project to be implemented in phases. This significantly lowers capital costs, shortens construction timelines, and reduces infrastructure risks.

The western route’s initial capacity is estimated at 7-10 million tons of cargo annually, making it the more realistic option for medium-term planning.

An additional advantage is its geo-economic flexibility. Via Herat, the route could be integrated not only southward through Pakistan, but also westward through Iran, providing access to Persian Gulf ports. This would transform it into a multi-directional corridor capable of serving several logistics flows simultaneously.

The Eastern Branch, therefore, remains the strategic option offering the shortest route to the ocean but requiring substantial investment and time. The Western Branch, meanwhile, presents a more pragmatic solution: faster to implement and more flexible from a geo-economic standpoint.

The Role of Turkmenistan and Kazakhstan in the “Western Maneuver”

The implementation of the western trans-Afghan corridor depends on close coordination between two key regional players, Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan, which form the northern foundation of the future route by providing access to the Caspian Sea and, beyond it, global markets. Astana and Ashgabat are effectively creating a new geo-economic framework that could transform Central Asia from an isolated region into a strategic crossroads linking the Caspian Sea with the Indian Ocean.

In 2026, Kazakhstan moved toward deeper institutionalization of the initiative, making the route through Herat and Kandahar a government priority. Astana’s strategy is multifaceted. In addition to establishing a permanent interdepartmental commission, Kazakhstan is actively seeking to attract international operators such as the Emirati AD Ports Group. Such cooperation could integrate Kazakhstan’s terminals at Aktau and Kuryk into a single logistics chain linked to the Afghan railway network, while also providing financial stability and international management standards.

In this configuration, Turkmenistan serves as a critical entry point without which the western route cannot function. Ashgabat has assumed the role of primary infrastructure donor during the initial phase, transforming the Turgundi border crossing into a major dry port. Modernization of the hub would synchronize cargo flows from Kazakhstan and Russia with the Afghan railway gauge, creating the capacity needed to transport millions of tons of cargo annually.

Particularly important is the integration of the route with Caspian maritime infrastructure. Close cooperation between the Turkmen port of Turkmenbashi and the Kazakh ports of Aktau and Kuryk could create a largely seamless multimodal corridor. This would allow for flexible logistics, with cargo transported either by rail through Turkmenistan or by sea, reducing congestion risks and optimizing freight costs for exporters of grain, metals, and energy resources.

Economic Impact and Logistical Advantages

The launch of full-scale trans-Afghan routes could significantly reshape the economics of Eurasian transit. Most importantly, cargo delivery from Kazakhstani ports to Pakistani ports could be reduced to 10-12 days, roughly 2.5 to three times faster than the traditional maritime route through the Suez Canal, which typically takes 35-45 days.

Cost reductions are also significant. Overland transit through Afghanistan could lower logistics costs by at least 15-20% during the initial phase, with potential savings rising to 30-40% once railway capacity expands and customs procedures are streamlined.

For Kazakhstan, the route carries strategic importance in terms of export diversification. Kazakhstan’s grain and flour exports to Afghanistan have already reached 1.5 million tons annually. Expanded railway infrastructure would not only increase these volumes but also broaden access to South Asian markets, including India.

China and the Southern Branch of the Middle Corridor

The development of a southern branch of the Middle Corridor through Afghanistan could be of considerable strategic interest to China as part of the diversification of its Belt and Road Initiative.

Against the backdrop of geopolitical risks in the Caucasus, as well as infrastructure and environmental constraints linked to the Caspian Sea, the western trans-Afghan branch could provide an alternative framework for logistical resilience. It would reduce dependence on bottlenecks, expand routing options, and enable the flexible redistribution of cargo flows.

The significance of the route extends beyond the traditional “North-South” framework. A two-way transit system is emerging in which Afghanistan becomes integrated into Eurasian value chains.

On one hand, the route could facilitate exports of Afghan resources to Central Asia, China, and Europe. Given Astana and Kabul’s plans to increase bilateral trade to $3 billion, the corridor could provide a sustainable foundation for that expansion. On the other hand, it would support reverse flows of industrial products, technologies, and investment needed for Afghanistan’s reconstruction and economic development.

Afghanistan’s resource base, including copper, lithium, and rare earth elements, is particularly important. Integrating these resources into a broader transport and logistics system could transform the corridor into part of a wider industrial chain encompassing extraction, processing, and export. For China, this would provide access to strategic raw materials and an opportunity to integrate new territories into its production networks.

This would also address several long-term geo-economic objectives for Beijing.

First, it would reduce reliance on maritime routes, particularly the Strait of Malacca, which remains vulnerable in the event of conflict or blockade. The western trans-Afghan branch could create an alternative overland route to the Indian Ocean via Karachi and Gwadar that would be far more difficult to disrupt.

Second, China could improve access to high-tech raw materials. Afghanistan’s reserves of lithium and copper are critical for producing solar panels, electric vehicles, and other advanced technologies, areas in which China remains the global leader. In this context, infrastructure investment becomes a mechanism for securing direct access to strategic resources.

Third, the route would contribute to a more balanced regional logistics system. Beijing has long relied heavily on the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor, but that route faces both geographic and political limitations. A western trans-Afghan corridor would provide an additional channel, helping distribute risk and increase overall resilience.

Fourth, the Middle Corridor itself would become more diversified. Its current configuration depends heavily on Caspian Sea crossings, which face both capacity and environmental constraints. The southern branch through Afghanistan could partially bypass these limitations or complement existing routes.

Finally, Beijing views regional security through the lens of economic development. Integrating Afghanistan into trade, transit, and resource extraction networks could contribute to the country’s stabilization and reduce instability risks near China’s western borders.

Conclusion

The emergence of a trans-Afghan route shows that the Middle Corridor is gradually evolving from a static transport corridor into a flexible, multi-vector system.

The western branch through Afghanistan represents the first feasible stage of this transformation. It could be developed faster than other options and appears more viable in economic and geographic terms. China’s involvement is a key factor, as the southern branch would reduce logistical risks for Beijing while opening access to new industrial and resource opportunities.

Afghanistan itself is gradually shifting from a peripheral territory to a key link in a new geo-economic architecture, while the Middle Corridor is becoming a platform connecting Europe, Central Asia, South Asia, and China.

More broadly, the focus is no longer solely on individual transport routes, but on the emergence of a new Eurasian economic configuration in which transport, resources, and industrial cooperation are integrated into a single system.

 

The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the publication, its affiliates, or any other organizations mentioned.

Ukraine’s Foreign Minister on Kazakhstan, Trade, and War

As Kyiv works to rebuild ties across Central Asia, Kazakhstan has become one of Ukraine’s most important regional interlocutors. The relationship has been shaped by war, trade disruption, humanitarian support, and the search for new transport routes linking Asia and Europe. The Times of Central Asia has previously reported on Ukraine’s efforts to deepen engagement with Central Asia and on Astana and Kyiv’s attempts to restore trade ties.

In an interview with TCA, Ukraine’s Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha discussed Kazakhstan’s role in this changing landscape, the prospects for economic cooperation, the Middle Corridor, post-war reconstruction, and the humanitarian and cultural ties connecting the two countries.

TCA: Against the backdrop of shifts in global politics and Central Asia’s growing role, Ukraine has been deepening its dialogue with the region. How are these relations being translated into practical cooperation in politics, economics, and the humanitarian sphere?

Foreign Minister Sybiha: Ukraine and Kazakhstan share a long-standing, traditionally friendly relationship, not only at a governmental level, but also between our peoples. My own family history is directly connected with Kazakhstan. My father worked in your wonderful country, in Kostanay. Many of his friends still live there. He often told me that he dreams of returning one day to see them again.

Personally, I associate Kazakhstan with many warm memories, including your unique cuisine. I love qazy; it is an incredibly delicious dish. Kazakhstan possesses a rich and distinctive culture, language, and national identity. I greatly admire how all of this continues to develop in modern Kazakhstan, especially how young people are embracing traditions and striving to preserve and enrich them. This is a sign of a strong nation that knows its roots and therefore has a future.

Kostanay is also linked to the story of our outstanding writer, Mykola Khvylovy, who lived and worked there for a period of time. You see how much connects our countries, even if we take just one city as an example. Unfortunately, there are tragic chapters as well. It was in Kostanay that our world-renowned orientalist, Slavic scholar, and one of the founders of the Ukrainian Academy of Sciences, Ahatanhel Krymsky, died in imprisonment. Those were terrible times, a painful past from which we must draw the right conclusions for the present and the future.

Turning to politics and global issues, I would emphasize the following: all our efforts are aimed at achieving peace. This war cannot be ended solely on the battlefield; Ukraine understands this very realistically. The question is whether Moscow is finally prepared to understand it as well. It is time to end the war and move toward diplomacy.

Today, Ukrainians are defending their homes and their children with weapons in their hands against unprovoked aggression. This is an existential struggle for the future of the next generations and for the right to remain Ukrainian. This struggle did not begin four and a half or even twelve years ago. Russia’s strategic objective is to complete what the Russian Empire began and what the Soviet Union failed to finish: the eradication of national identity and the destruction of the very foundation of our existence as a separate nation.

Ukraine and Kazakhstan both remember the tragic pages of our history: bans on language and culture, the destruction of the intelligentsia, deportations, repression, and famines. We cannot allow this to happen again.

That is why support from international partners is fundamentally important to us. Ukraine highly values Kazakhstan’s clear position regarding the need to uphold the principles of international law and the UN Charter. For us, this is an important signal. It reflects a shared understanding of the fundamental principles of international relations.

Ukraine has practical proposals even on the most sensitive aspects of the peace process. What is needed is the political will of the international community to compel Russia to turn toward diplomacy and peace rather than aggression and terror.

One of the essential prerequisites for safeguarding our independence and sovereignty is the development and strengthening of ties with friendly nations. Central Asia is firmly within our focus, and Kazakhstan undoubtedly plays a key role here.

We see how the region is emerging as an important component of the Eurasian economic, trade, energy, and logistics system. Kazakhstan’s importance is defined not only by its regional role, but also by its active participation in international organizations and formats, from the United Nations to the OSCE. Kazakhstan is an active participant in a number of regional initiatives and the initiator of its own platforms, including the Conference on Interaction and Confidence Building Measures in Asia (CICA).

Recently, I took part in the Antalya Diplomacy Forum, where President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev was also present. I was pleased to have the opportunity to briefly speak with him and convey a message from President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. We reaffirmed our readiness to deepen cooperation between our countries.

It is extremely important that our dialogue is regaining momentum. Recently, interagency consultations took place for the first time in quite a long period. Business dialogue is also continuing: just a few weeks ago, a joint business forum was held.

Photo courtesy of the Embassy of Ukraine in Kazakhstan

TCA: Indeed, we have recently witnessed growing engagement between Ukrainian and Kazakh businesses. In this regard, what prospects do you see for increasing trade turnover and attracting Kazakh investment into the Ukrainian economy?

Foreign Minister Sybiha: Businesses tend to respond very sensitively to the overall state of bilateral relations. Therefore, I would say that business missions, forums, and sectoral meetings are evidence of a return to more systematic economic interaction. Without this “living fabric” of cooperation, political agreements, frankly speaking, cannot function fully. By the end of this year, we plan to hold at least two more major business events.

At the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, we devote considerable attention to economic diplomacy: facilitating direct contacts between companies, supporting business initiatives through the Embassy of Ukraine in Kazakhstan, and assisting in organizing visits, forums, and sectoral dialogues. Today, our diplomatic missions are working much more actively as platforms for identifying partners, supporting projects, and establishing communication between business communities.

We are seeing growing interest from Ukrainian companies in the Central Asian market, particularly Kazakhstan, and especially in agriculture, food processing, engineering, IT, and other high-value-added sectors. At the same time, it is crucial that this process remains two-way.

A considerable number of enterprises in Kazakhstan were established with the participation of Ukrainian specialists using Ukrainian technologies and equipment. One well-known example is Dmytro Yurchenko, the first director of the Mangystau Atomic Energy Combine (MAEK), who is still remembered and respected in the Mangystau region. Today, Ukraine is also ready to offer partnership in the modernization and technical upgrading of relevant industries.

There is also significant potential for expanding cooperation in transport and logistics, particularly in the context of the development of the Middle Corridor, which is increasingly emerging as a key alternative route between Asia and Europe. Ukraine views this not merely as a transit opportunity but also as a space for practical cooperation and for utilizing its own capabilities to build an integrated logistics chain with high added value, including tariff coordination, digitalization of transportation, and port infrastructure development.

We are prepared to contribute to these processes by offering our own experience in multimodal transportation, digital logistics solutions, and integration into European transport networks.

In this regard, the development of the Trans-Caspian International Transport Route (TITR) and related corridors creates additional opportunities for trade, and we are interested in ensuring that Ukrainian businesses become active participants in these processes.

An important element of this architecture will also be Ukrainian Black Sea ports, which are capable of providing an effective gateway for further transportation of goods into the European Union. With the proper integration of logistics processes, this could significantly increase the corridor’s capacity and reduce delivery times. In this way, Ukraine can serve not only as a destination point but also as a fully integrated participant in the regional logistics system.

Kazakhstan’s recent diplomatic engagement with South Caucasus countries is particularly noteworthy, as it is directly aimed at strengthening the western segment of the Middle Corridor. These are not merely political declarations, but concrete infrastructure and institutional decisions, including the development of multimodal terminals, tariff coordination, the creation of digital cargo-tracking mechanisms, and efforts to improve logistics predictability.

In effect, an integrated chain is being formed: “China-Central Asia-Caspian-South Caucasus-Black Sea-EU,” with Azerbaijan and Georgia serving as the key western artery of the route. In this context, Ukraine objectively complements this configuration by providing access to European markets through its own port and transport infrastructure.

I am convinced that the current intensification of contacts is only the beginning of a much broader stage of economic cooperation that will have very practical consequences from expanded trade and new logistics routes to joint participation in Ukraine’s reconstruction.

TCA: What prospects do you see for the participation of Kazakh businesses and investors in Ukraine’s reconstruction processes? Which areas do you consider most realistic for such cooperation?

Foreign Minister Sybiha: We view Ukraine’s reconstruction separately and very pragmatically as a long-term process that goes beyond post-war rebuilding alone. In fact, it is shaping a new economic architecture for the country: from investment decisions, joint ventures, and localization of production to infrastructure, industry, logistics, social development, and energy.

It is important that Kazakhstan remains one of the key suppliers of energy resources in Eurasia while simultaneously diversifying and modernizing its energy sector. Kazakhstan is also one of the world’s leading producers of uranium, which is a critical resource for nuclear energy generation. This plays an important role in global energy security.

Ukraine is open to transparent, pragmatic, and mutually beneficial participation in these processes.

In this context, we regard Kazakhstan as one of our natural regional partners, above all because of the already established economic ties, the experience Ukrainian and Kazakh enterprises have gained in each other’s markets, and the historically accumulated human and professional capital. We effectively share a common industrial and technological history, which it is entirely logical to continue today in the form of modernization and new investment projects.

For our part, we are interested in seeing Kazakh businesses and investors participate in Ukraine’s reconstruction after the war ends. Importantly, Kazakhstan is among the partner countries with which this dialogue already has practical substance.

Ukrainian children on vacation in Kazakhstan. Photo courtesy of the Ukrainian Embassy in Kazakhstan

TCA: Kazakhstan has consistently pursued balanced relations both with neighboring states and with Western countries. How does Ukraine assess this position, and what opportunities for cooperation does it see in areas of mutual interest, particularly in energy security, transport corridors, and humanitarian interaction?

Foreign Minister Sybiha: Kazakhstan is implementing a thoughtful economic strategy aimed at developing infrastructure, energy, and industrial projects in cooperation with a wide range of international partners across different regions of the country.

President Tokayev, an experienced statesman and diplomat who has consistently shaped Kazakhstan’s foreign policy and economic development model, plays an important role in strengthening the country’s sovereignty and international standing.

The Central Asia Plus (CA+) format has also become increasingly prominent internationally, and nearly all of Ukraine’s key partners have already joined it: the EU, the United Kingdom, the United States, Germany, Japan, and Türkiye. We also positively assess the participation of Azerbaijan’s president in the annual Consultative Meetings of Central Asian leaders.

We are interested in launching a “Ukraine + Central Asia” dialogue platform, with transregional transport and logistics connectivity at its core. In our understanding, such a format would in no way be directed “against anyone.” Its primary goal would be to intensify direct dialogue without intermediaries, identify practical mutual benefits, and strengthen the traditionally friendly ties between our peoples.

We observe with respect how Kazakhstan is naturally undergoing a process of strengthening Kazakh national identity and historical self-awareness, while at the same time preserving its multinational character and safeguarding the rights and cultural needs of ethnic communities. Ethnic Ukrainians constitute the country’s fourth-largest ethnic group, around 2% of Kazakhstan’s population of 20.5 million.

The policy of “Unity in Diversity” is being effectively implemented, and in this context, I would recall President Tokayev’s statement that “Ukrainian culture is an important part of the cultural diversity of the Great Steppe.”

There is also an interesting historical parallel. Taras Shevchenko is sometimes described as the first Ukrainian diplomat in Kazakhstan. He is deeply respected and appreciated in Kazakhstan as a Ukrainian who made a significant contribution to the representation and understanding of Kazakh culture. In fact, he became one of the first internationally recognized artists to depict the life of the Kazakh people, their landscapes, everyday life, and the culture of the Great Steppe.

Without exaggeration, Shevchenko is a truly unifying figure for our peoples. He spent ten years in Kazakhstan, during which he created a substantial portion of his artistic work, much of it portraying the lives of Kazakhs.

We are sincerely grateful to Kazakhstan for preserving Shevchenko’s memory with such respect both in the places connected to him and toward his legacy itself. In Kazakhstan, he is often called Akyn Tarazi.

In particular, the city of Fort-Shevchenko, where he spent part of his exile, holds special significance. It is not merely a location on the map, but an important cultural space. It houses a memorial museum, his dugout shelter, and the world’s first monument to Taras Shevchenko, Akyn Tarazi, stands there.

This year, Fort-Shevchenko marks the 180th anniversary of its founding, which also creates an opportunity for joint cultural and humanitarian initiatives dedicated to this milestone.

With the participation of the Embassy of Ukraine in Kazakhstan, local authorities, and museum institutions from both countries, including the National Taras Shevchenko Museum in Kyiv and the museum in Fort-Shevchenko, a Memorandum of Cooperation has been signed. It provides for exchanges of specialists and work on expanding the museum exhibition through digital copies of Shevchenko’s works.

This is especially important because today, only one original portrait painted by Taras Shevchenko is preserved in Kazakhstan.

Expanding the digital collection will make the exhibition more complete and accessible to a broader audience. This is not only about preserving memory, but about maintaining a living humanitarian bridge between Ukraine and Kazakhstan: culture, history, and art help people understand one another more deeply.

A vast field for joint research also concerns the notorious Stalinist labor camps, ALZHIR, Steplag, and Karlag, through which hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians and Kazakhs passed. At the end of May this year, an international academic conference dedicated to this topic and to the 80th anniversary of the liquidation of the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church by the Soviet authorities will take place in Astana with the participation of the Ukrainian side.

Another important direction remains the implementation of exhibition and creative projects that give our cooperation tangible and living substance.

TCA: Which humanitarian areas, particularly in education and science, currently form the strongest basis for the sustainable development of Ukrainian-Kazakh interaction?

Foreign Minister Sybiha: Humanitarian projects, from supporting people to cultural and educational initiatives, remain the very foundation that sustains trust between our societies despite all existing challenges.

If we speak about academic cooperation between Ukraine and Kazakhstan, this has long been a natural and ongoing process of interaction. Today, a significant number of Ukrainian specialists work in Kazakhstan’s universities, both in the capital and in regional institutions.

At Alkey Margulan Pavlodar Pedagogical University, there is a unique International Laboratory for the Conservation and Restoration of Cultural Heritage “UMAI,” headed by the Ukrainian researcher, restorer, and archaeologist Tetiana Krupa, who has received both state and professional awards in Kazakhstan for her major contribution to the development of science. This is an example of sustainable professional exchange and the mutual enrichment of experience.

Another important bridge between our educational systems consists of Kazakh citizens who graduated from Ukrainian universities. Having once studied in Ukraine, they now ensure continuity in academic ties between our countries, keeping them vibrant and sustainable.

It should be noted that before 2019, prior to the pandemic, academic mobility and university exchanges between Ukraine and Kazakhstan were significantly more intensive. Academic exchange programs and distance-learning opportunities were actively utilized.

However, because of COVID-19 and later Russia’s aggression and the introduction of martial law in Ukraine, the pace of academic exchanges and the use of existing educational quotas slowed down. Nevertheless, I am convinced that after the war, these educational quotas between Ukraine and Kazakhstan will once again be fully utilized and will likely need to be expanded on both sides.

Even so, Ukrainian-Kazakh cooperation in education and science continues to develop. One example is the organization of international scientific and practical conferences, which bring together academic communities from different countries and serve as platforms for sharing experience, building inter-university ties, and developing new joint projects.

Within the framework of this professional dialogue, we intend to initiate the establishment of a Council of Rectors of Ukraine and Kazakhstan as an institutional mechanism for systematically strengthening cooperation between higher educational institutions in both countries. Such a format has the potential to improve coordination between universities, foster joint educational and research programs, and deepen academic ties.

Photo courtesy of the Ukrainian Embassy in Kazakhstan

TCA: Interestingly, one of the “Yurts of Invincibility” has been operating for several years near the main building of Taras Shevchenko University. These initiatives also helped Ukrainians survive the winter months. In this context, what human and cultural factors do you believe most strongly unite Ukrainians and Kazakhs today?

Foreign Minister Sybiha: The “Yurts of Invincibility,” which provided warmth and food to people during the harshest wartime winters, have been operating in Ukraine for four years already. Such yurts are currently functioning in various Ukrainian cities; if I am not mistaken, there are now eight of them.

We remain in constant contact with the Embassy of the Republic of Kazakhstan in Ukraine, which is also a regular participant in cultural and humanitarian missions.

Ukraine is sincerely grateful to Kazakhstan for its warmth of heart, for its real acts of assistance and support. Since the beginning of Russia’s full-scale aggression, Kazakhstan has provided Ukraine with around 600 tons of humanitarian aid. This has included medicines, essential goods, generators, and other critically important support items.

We also highly value the opportunity for Ukrainian children to undergo rehabilitation and recreation in Kazakhstan’s health resorts. In June 2025, a group of children from the Cherkasy region, accompanied by three adults, visited Kazakhstan for rest and recuperation at the Baldauren educational and wellness center. In January 2026, another group of children from the Sumy region arrived in Aktau for rest and recuperation.

This program is supported at the presidential level in Kazakhstan and is an example of the kind of human interaction that builds trust and lays the foundation for deeper relations in the future.

Ukrainian-Kazakh cooperation is undoubtedly a deep and multilayered relationship that has evolved over many years and possesses enormous potential for further development. It is not only about politics or economics; above all, it is about the living human connection between our peoples, which ultimately defines the strength of our relationship.