• KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00193 -0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10811 -0.28%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28490 0%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00193 -0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10811 -0.28%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28490 0%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00193 -0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10811 -0.28%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28490 0%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00193 -0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10811 -0.28%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28490 0%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00193 -0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10811 -0.28%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28490 0%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00193 -0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10811 -0.28%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28490 0%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00193 -0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10811 -0.28%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28490 0%
  • KGS/USD = 0.01144 0%
  • KZT/USD = 0.00193 -0%
  • TJS/USD = 0.10811 -0.28%
  • UZS/USD = 0.00008 0%
  • TMT/USD = 0.28490 0%
10 December 2025

Cardiff University to Open New Campus in Kazakhstan

Cardiff University in Wales has announced plans to open a new campus in Astana, Kazakhstan’s capital, later this year. The move represents a major step in the university’s global expansion and underscores its commitment to providing world-class education in Central Asia.

According to Kazakhstan’s Ministry of Science and Higher Education, Cardiff University Kazakhstan will begin offering programs in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) and Business in 2025, with undergraduate programs to follow in 2026​.

The Astana campus is being developed in partnership with the not-for-profit Public Foundation “Qualified Centre of Education” (QCEF).

To ensure broad access, the Kazakh government has pledged to provide up to 500 fully funded scholarships over the first three years of the campus’s operation. The initiative aims to make high-quality education accessible to talented students across Kazakhstan.

Once fully operational, the campus is expected to accommodate more than 2,500 students annually, contributing to the development of a skilled workforce and supporting economic growth in the region.

Cardiff University’s President and Vice-Chancellor, Professor Wendy Larner, said: “We are excited about the opportunities that the Cardiff University Kazakhstan campus will create. It is clear from our extensive discussions with the Kazakh government, investors, and other stakeholders that this initiative will be truly reciprocal and mutually beneficial.”

Artificial Glaciers Created in Kyrgyzstan for Sustainable Agriculture and Climate Change Adaptation

As the international community observed the first-ever World Day for Glaciers on March 21, a project led by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) has demonstrated how artificial glaciers can help rural communities in Kyrgyzstan adapt to the effects of climate change.

As part of the FAO initiative, seven artificial glaciers were constructed in villages across the Batken region of southern Kyrgyzstan in late autumn 2024​.

Over the winter, these glaciers accumulated more than 1.5 million cubic meters of ice. As spring temperatures rise, the ice begins to melt, providing essential irrigation water for downstream agricultural lands. According to FAO experts, more than 1,750 hectares of land, equivalent to 2,451 football fields, can be irrigated using furrow irrigation. If modern systems are introduced, this could expand to as much as 15,000 hectares.

These artificial glaciers are relatively simple structures designed to collect and freeze water in winter for agricultural use in summer, including for irrigation and livestock. On average, one glacier can support irrigation on 300 to 500 hectares.

“The key is to choose the right location,” said Matraim Jusupov, FAO expert on water-saving technologies. “We channel water from a mountain spring through a pipeline ending in a vertical pipe 10-15 meters high. The elevation difference generates pressure, which allows us to spray water into the air. At sub-zero temperatures, it freezes and gradually forms an ice cone.”

To build the glaciers, 6,956 meters of pipeline were laid. FAO supplied construction materials and technical guidance, while the work was carried out by local residents.

The FAO office in Kyrgyzstan has since developed universal guidelines for building artificial glaciers and distributed them across the country. Based on this experience, new glacier construction is already underway in other regions.

Global Glacier Melt

According to the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) and the World Glacier Monitoring Service (WGMS), five of the past six years have seen the fastest glacier retreat ever recorded. The years 2022–2024 marked the largest three-year loss of glacier mass in history​. Once regarded as “eternal ice,” many glaciers are now unlikely to survive the 21st century.

There are more than 275,000 glaciers worldwide, covering approximately 700,000 square kilometers. Along with ice sheets, glaciers store about 70% of the planet’s freshwater. Their depletion threatens water supplies for hundreds of millions of people.

In response to this growing crisis, the UN General Assembly declared 2025 the International Year of Glaciers’ Preservation and designated March 21 as the annual World Day for Glaciers. The initiative aims to raise awareness of the critical role glaciers play in the global climate and hydrological systems, and their significance to economic and ecological stability. UNESCO and WMO are leading the global coordination effort, supported by over 200 organizations and 35 countries.

Kyrgyzstan’s Initiatives

A Kyrgyz delegation led by Dinara Kemelova, the President’s Special Representative for the Five Years of Action for Mountain Regions Development, participated in World Day for Glaciers events at UNESCO headquarters in Paris on March 20-21​.

The meetings focused on the latest scientific research, knowledge exchange, technology transfer, and the socio-economic impacts of glacier retreat. Participants also discussed political strategies and financial mechanisms to address the climate crisis.

Kemelova highlighted Kyrgyzstan’s mountain-focused initiatives and upcoming projects under the Five Years of Action plan. She sounded the alarm over the rapid loss of glaciers in Kyrgyzstan and called for urgent action at both regional and global levels.

She also invited international participants to the upcoming Global Mountain Dialogue for Sustainable Development conference, set to take place in Bishkek on April 24-25.

Uzbekistan Delivers Humanitarian Aid to Afghanistan for Navruz and Eid

Uzbekistan has delivered humanitarian aid to Afghanistan in advance of the Navruz holiday and the upcoming Eid al-Fitr. According to the Surkhandarya regional administration, approximately 200 tons of food products were sent to Afghanistan’s Balkh region.

The aid was formally handed over in the city of Hairaton, at the Afghan facility of the Astras company. The ceremony was attended by Ismatilla Irgashev, Special Representative of the President of Uzbekistan for Afghanistan, Ulugbek Qosimov, Governor of Surkhandarya region, and Afghan and Uzbek officials. Muhammad Yusuf Vafo, Governor of Balkh, also took part.

The shipment included flour, wheat, pasta, vegetable oil, sugar, instant noodles, red beans, and mung beans. Afghan officials expressed appreciation to the president and people of Uzbekistan for their continued support and extended their warm wishes for the upcoming Eid celebrations.

During the visit, delegations from both countries met in Mazar-i-Sharif to discuss future cooperation. Talks also covered Uzbekistan’s role in supporting the construction of the Imam Bukhari mausoleum in Afghanistan.

This aid comes amid ongoing economic challenges in Afghanistan following the Taliban’s return to power in 2021. As traditional donors such as the United States and the European Union reduce their presence, Afghanistan increasingly depends on regional support from neighbors like Uzbekistan.

Uzbekistan has previously extended medical assistance as well. At the end of last year, it was announced that Uzbek doctors would provide free medical examinations to residents of Balkh.

Tajik Entrepreneurs Return to Kyrgyz Markets

Following the reopening of the Kyrgyz-Tajik border, Tajik entrepreneurs have resumed visits to markets in Batken Oblast, Kyrgyzstan. Local media report that residents are welcoming the return of their southern neighbors​.

Once a week, the market in Ak-Turpak village becomes a hub of activity, drawing sellers and buyers from across the region and neighboring countries. A major draw is Batken rice, which resellers purchase in bulk for export to Uzbekistan and Russia. According to local vendors, the market can sell up to 200 tons of rice on a busy day.

Rice is cultivated across 3,000 hectares in this border region and remains a vital source of income for many farmers.

With the border now open and economic ties restored, buyers from Isfara, Tajikistan, have begun frequenting the Ak-Turpak market, offering a welcome boost to Kyrgyz vendors.

As previously reported by The Times of Central Asia, residents of Batken’s border districts also benefit from cross-border trade, often finding it more economical to purchase certain fruits and vegetables in Tajikistan than in Kyrgyzstan’s oblast centers.

On March 13, 2025, following the signing of bilateral agreements, the Kairagach and Kyzyl-Bel border checkpoints in Batken Oblast officially reopened. According to Kyrgyzstan’s Border Guard Service, approximately 5,000 people crossed the Kyrgyz-Tajik border between March 13 and 17. An additional 500 individuals crossed by air. Prior to the agreement, all crossings had remained closed since 2021.

Uzbekistan’s New Emphasis on the Military

Uzbekistan has become Central Asia’s leader in terms of military spending. This raises some questions about why Uzbekistan has boosted its military spending, but it should also get the attention of Uzbekistan’s Central Asian neighbors.

According to Global Firepower’s 2025 Military Strength ranking, Uzbekistan’s defense budget was a little more than $2.8 billion, ahead of Kazakhstan which spent just over $2 billion. Kazakhstan still ranked ahead of Uzbekistan in overall military strength, 57th and 58th, respectively, but in 2024, Global Firepower ranked Kazakhstan 58th and Uzbekistan 65th.

Voice of America noted in a July 2024 report that military spending was generally increasing across Central Asia, a “development officials link to regional conflicts such as the war in Ukraine.”

Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan boosted their military spending after they fought brief but destructive battles against each at the end of April 2021, and again in mid-September 2022. In March 2023, Kamchybek Tashiyev, the head of Kyrgyzstan’s security service, said that since the 2021 conflict, his country had spent some $1 billion on military equipment, including military drones from Turkey.

Global Firepower’s 2025 report stated that Kyrgyzstan spent $221.8 million and Tajikistan $446 million on defense in 2024.

Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan are the poorest countries in Central Asia.

Where is the Threat?

Uzbekistan and more broadly Central Asia’s increase in defense spending raise the question of why is it necessary.

Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan’s surge in military spending was a reaction to the border conflicts of 2021 and 2022. The root cause of that fighting was disputed territories along their frontier, but this year the two countries finally signed a delimitation agreement and relations have improved.

The Central Asian states have legitimate security concerns, most emanating from Afghanistan, though not necessarily from the Taliban. Despite occasional saber-rattling, the Taliban are unlikely to ever try to attack or invade any Central Asian country, and presently most of the Central Asian states have established an amiable business relationship with the Taliban.

Militant groups operating in Afghanistan are the major concern.

These groups based in Afghanistan are the main threats to the Central Asian governments and require the Central Asian states to develop counter-terrorism capabilities, something they have been doing since the late 1990s. The anti-aircraft systems and missiles the Central Asian states, including Uzbekistan, are purchasing are ill-suited to counter-terrorism operations.

The timing of the significant increase in military spending came not long after Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in late February 2022. Several Russian politicians and political commentators have spoken of reclaiming part of all of Kazakhstan in particular, but Uzbekistan has also been mentioned lately.

It would be understandable for Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan to bolster their defenses in case the day comes when Russia looks to forcibly reincorporate Central Asia back into its empire. But Russia is listed second on Global Firepower’s ranking of military powers and the country’s defense budget in 2024 was some $126 billion. Without outside assistance, it is unlikely Kazakhstan or Uzbekistan could hold out for long against a determined Russian military assault.

The same is true when looking at Central Asia’s eastern neighbor, China, which is ranked third on the Global Firepower list and spent a whopping $266.85 billion on defense in 2024.

Regional Superpower

There is something of an arms race underway in Central Asia, and that is driving all five states to increase their defense budgets. Uzbekistan has good relations with all its immediate Central Asian neighbors, including Afghanistan, so there is no discernible threat that would compel the country to boost military spending.

One possible explanation is that Uzbekistan is once again looking to become Central Asia’s military superpower.

Uzbekistan’s first president, Islam Karimov, pursued such a policy. He envisioned a Central Asia with as little Russian military presence as possible and worked to make Uzbekistan’s army the dominant force in the region. Unfortunately for Uzbekistan’s neighbors, the cantankerous Karimov often intimidated or insulted their leadership, making Uzbekistan’s growing military power an ominous development.

For a variety of reasons, including financial and the unforeseen rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan that required courting Russian security assurances, the aim of being a regional policeman went unrealized.

Uzbek President Shavkat Mirziyoyev can take credit for the new spirit of regional cooperation in Central Asia today. When he came to power in late 2016 after Karimov’s death, Mirziyoyev made improving Uzbekistan’s tattered ties with its neighbors one of his first priorities. He succeeded to the point where Central Asian unity is helping mitigate past dependences on Russia, including for security guarantees.

In the future, Uzbekistan, alongside Kazakhstan, could provide a solid military foundation for regional forces. Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan, by far the two biggest countries in Central Asia, have strengthened military and security cooperation since Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine. In 2024, the two countries conducted the Hanjar (Dagger) joint exercises in November, and the Hamkorlik (Cooperation) joint exercises in October, and in 2023, the Hanjar exercises in August, and the Qalqon (Shield) drills in May.

The two countries could be looking toward a day when their neighboring Central Asian countries call for Kazakh-Uzbek help instead of Russian aid if there is an internal or regional security problem. None of the countries in Central Asia are anxious to call for Russian troops to arrive in large numbers unless it is the only way to avoid some sort of catastrophic defeat. Given the current sentiment in the Kremlin, those Russian troops might stay in Central Asia. Being able to depend on security assistance from strong cultural cousins would likely be infinitely preferable to requesting help from a former colonizer.

One other possibility for Uzbekistan’s recent push to expand its military potential involves long-term strategy. Uzbekistan has the largest population in Central Asia, more than 37 million people, or nearly half of Central Asia’s total population.

Global Firepower’s rankings put Uzbekistan’s number of military personnel at an estimated 60,000 (not including security and interior ministry forces, and border guards), but notes the number of people “fit for service” is nearly 16 million. Tajikistan’s total population was nearly 10.5 million at the start of 2025, Kyrgyzstan’s was some 7.3 million, and Turkmenistan’s was just over 7 million, according to the Turkmen government’s official statistics, which are widely suspected of being greatly inflated.

Again, Uzbekistan’s relations with all its neighbors are better now than at perhaps any time previously in the country’s nearly 34-year history. But Uzbekistan’s relations with its neighbors were not always good and often in the past Uzbekistan was at odds with two or more of those neighbors at the same time. That is something none of the other Central Asian governments are likely to have forgotten.

These are uncertain geopolitical times in many areas of the world and many countries are upping their purchases of weapons. Central Asia is no exception, and with better reason than many as Central Asia borders China, Russia, Iran, and Afghanistan.

However, when the most populous Central Asian country, which in the recent past has exhibited signs of aiming for military dominance in the region, begins to spend more on its military than any of its neighbors, it cannot help but raise a few eyebrows.

Power Shifts in Central Asia: The Unpredictable Path of Leadership

European Union Commissioner for International Partnerships Josef Sikela has concluded his tour of Central Asia, a visit conducted against the backdrop of global geopolitical turbulence. Unlike previous engagements, where European officials often criticized the region’s leadership for a lack of democratic progress, Sikela refrained from making demands on local governments.

Historically, Europe has accused Central Asian states of authoritarianism and the entrenchment of long-serving leaders. However, the idea that power is uniquely permanent in the region is increasingly questioned. Critics point to Western examples, such as Angela Merkel’s 16-year tenure as Germany’s chancellor, and alleged electoral manipulation within the EU, such as in Romania, where elections were annulled after an undesired candidate’s victory. Meanwhile, in Central Asia, even presidents once considered “eternal” have eventually left office, sometimes peacefully, sometimes under turbulent conditions.

Kyrgyzstan: The Unpredictable Outlier

Kyrgyzstan is often described as a “democratic exception” within Central Asia, yet its history is marked by political instability and frequent leadership changes, arguably more so than in many of the world’s most conflict-prone regions.

The country’s first president, Askar Akayev, held power from 1990 to 2005. Though re-elected three times, his rule ended in March 2005 when protests erupted over parliamentary election results that heavily favored pro-government candidates. Demonstrators stormed the Government House in Bishkek, prompting Akayev to flee. Reports, though unverified, claimed he was smuggled out wrapped in a carpet.

Following Akayev’s ouster, Kurmanbek Bakiyev took power, but his rule ended in 2010 after violent unrest. His downfall was allegedly facilitated by Kazakhstan’s intelligence services, and he later found political asylum in Belarus under President Alexander Lukashenko.

Since Bakiyev’s departure, Kyrgyzstan has continued to experience political turbulence. Presidents Almazbek Atambayev (2010-2017) and Sooronbai Jeenbekov (2017-2020) both left office under pressure. Atambayev’s tenure saw a diplomatic fallout with Kazakhstan, while Jeenbekov resigned in 2020 amid protests over parliamentary elections. His successor, Sadyr Japarov, remains in office, but whether he will complete his term is an open question.

Uzbekistan: Reform Within Limits

Islam Karimov, Uzbekistan’s first post-Soviet leader, ruled for over 26 years before his death in 2016. While he maintained a strictly centralized government, his tenure was also marked by violent crackdowns, most notably the Andijan uprising in 2005, which resulted in a Western diplomatic fallout​.

His successor, Shavkat Mirziyoyev, has introduced some reforms, loosening restrictions on civil liberties and the economy. However, the fundamental structure of state control remains intact, with opposition movements still tightly monitored.

Kazakhstan: From Nazarbayev to Tokayev

Kazakhstan’s transition from Nursultan Nazarbayev to Kassym-Jomart Tokayev is often described as managed succession rather than a genuine power shift. Nazarbayev, who led Kazakhstan for nearly three decades, officially stepped down in 2019, yet retained significant influence until the January 2022 unrest, which forced him to relinquish much of his remaining power.

These protests, initially sparked by fuel price hikes, rapidly escalated into anti-government riots. While official accounts describe the unrest as an attempted coup orchestrated by figures within Nazarbayev’s inner circle, critics suggest Tokayev used the crisis to consolidate power. Tokayev initiated and passed a new constitutional amendment now limiting Kazakhstan’s presidency to a single seven-year term​.

Tokayev secured victory in Kazakhstan’s most recent election on November 20, 2022, capturing 81.31% of the vote, solidifying his presidency.

Tajikistan: A Family Dynasty in Waiting?

Tajikistan’s first president, Rakhmon Nabiyev, faced early instability, and his 1992 resignation amid civil war paved the way for Emomali Rahmon, who has ruled ever since. Many believe Rahmon is preparing his son, Rustam Emomali, the current mayor of Dushanbe, to inherit power, effectively transforming the presidency into a family dynasty​.

Turkmenistan: Power in Name or Reality?

Turkmenistan remains the only Central Asian republic where leadership has formally passed from father to son. Saparmurat Niyazov, known as “Turkmenbashi”, ruled until his death in 2006, after which Gurbanguly Berdimuhamedov took power. In 2022, he handed the presidency to his son, Serdar Berdimuhamedov, though many suspect real power remains with the elder Berdimuhamedov, who now chairs the Halk Maslahaty (People’s Council)​.

Conclusion: A Shifting Political Landscape

Central Asia presents a complex picture of governance, where long-term rulers have either strategically passed power or been removed through upheaval. While critics argue that the region remains authoritarian, others point out that Western models of democracy are not always as transparent or stable as they appear.

What remains undeniable is that political evolution in Central Asia continues, sometimes through carefully managed transitions, sometimes through unrest, coups, or protest-driven resignations. Whether these shifts lead to lasting reforms or entrenched power structures in new forms remains to be seen.